FFH
Veteran Member
We are on topic, we need to find out if Hugh is a legitimate source of info/interpretation of scripture or not..calm down children, let's get back on topic please?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We are on topic, we need to find out if Hugh is a legitimate source of info/interpretation of scripture or not..calm down children, let's get back on topic please?
We are on topic, we need to find out if Hugh is a legitimate source of info/interpretation of scripture or not..
Instead of quoting him all the time and printing articles he wrote in the Ensign.You would think the Brethren would have said something if he wasn't. :yes:
Instead of quoting him all the time and printing articles he wrote in the Ensign.
I know, I guess the Ensign isn't approved by the Church either.
This is in reference to what you posted earlier.neither is this forum or thread,
I just want christ to come so that we can get on with this whole thing. *sigh*
This is in reference to what you posted earlier.
Matthew 24: 22
And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elects sake those days shall be shortened.
Mark 13: 20
And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be saved: but for the elects sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the days.
Revelation 22: 7, 12
Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.
Old earth theorists/evolutionists will put the earth in several "ice boxes" over the last gazillion years, in order to discredit my theories...Thanks FFH, i didn't have time to look it up right now cause i'm at work. So i appreciate the research on my behalf.
the dead sea thing is very very interesting. i'm going to have to read those articles.
Natural History Magazine | FeatureFFH said:Old earth theorists/evolutionists will put the earth in several "ice boxes" over the last gazillion years, in order to discredit my theories...
Here is another theory, I call it the "Old Shed" theory.
say you have an old shed, 150 years old or so.
you dismantle it, save the wood and nails and such and they should still be in fairly usable conditon.
then using those same materials you build another shed, or a dog house and it works just fine.
then years later a scientist comes along ans makes a statement that this new shed (or dog house) is over 150 years old because of carbon dating ect....
but what he doesn't know is that the materials are that old indeed, but the shed was actually build only a few years ago.
Now with that in mind, could it not be possible that the materials (nitrogen, silicon, carbon, ect...) are Millions and Billions of years old, but that they were used to construct the earth as we have now?
FFH, I totally agree with you on this matter, and i'll definitely stand as a witness to that. (you still get a little creepy and "out there" when it comes to antichrist matters and such, but we still love ya)
I see where you're coming from. Think of this. We now have telescopes in space charting the movements of the continents. They're not moving by much each year but they are moving. Multiply their movement rate now and count backwards. It will be more than 13,000 years.
I'm stumped as to why this basic imformation is lost on people who continue to believe in the young earth theory. Forget carbon dating or radioactive dating. Forget all of that. We now have the ability to tract the movements of the continents and we have been doing it for years and the continents are STILL moving. If the continents were connected together as we can can clearly see because they fit together like a jigsaw puzzle then their seperation happened over millions of years. The only conclusion you can draw at this point is that the "planet earth"........ the land mass itself is older, millions of years older, than the young earth theory that is given.
Everythign we are seeing from telescopes, is delayed by thousands of years because of how slow light travels. what you are seeign already happened thousands of years ago,
Hell if there was a big enough earthquake which is not impossible it could have happened underwater all at one time. Who knows?
I have a question. How come we can see the light of stars from more than 13,000 light years away? Wouldn't this be impossible because the speed of light is a fixed number?
We may not be getting our information from the same sources. I am only talking about the movement that is documented with telescopes and lasers and this is done continously throughout the year. So the data is not from a thousand or thousands of years ago. The data is litterlay a year old. Since we have been able to study this situation the earth has changed very little.
Now what I haven't seen was an answer to a question I asked earlier today. Can I get a list of scientist that support Continental Drift happening over the course os 13,000 years? I need some of the scientist you all are using that say different than mainstream scientific data.
http://environment.newscientist.com/article/mg19225780.041
Moving Continents: Images of Continental Drift
Magnetic Reversals and Moving Continents
NOVA Online/Cracking the Ice Age/Hot Science: Continents on the Move/Answer 2
But that's the problem. I need data that has shown that something like this has occured. Especially something so drastic as to move all of the earth apart over the short span of 13,000 years. The bible is no good in this area because it is vague at best and open to man, many interpertations.