Actually, I suspect that evolution theories do not sound ridiculous to you but, rather, heretical.Sounds ridiculous ????? Well that's just how evolution theories sound to me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually, I suspect that evolution theories do not sound ridiculous to you but, rather, heretical.Sounds ridiculous ????? Well that's just how evolution theories sound to me.
Right continent, wrong state. I was born 165 miles from the Garden of Eden, where the Almighty created humankind on the banks of the Apalachicola River in Liberty County, Florida.Trust you guys to claim the garden of Eden was on your continent...........
See this page: Date of the flood
You didn't read the rest of that thread, in which I said that the whole earth could have been the Garden of Eden. or at least a paradise, and most likely was, but the part of the Garden of Eden, where Adam and Eve lived, was in North America/Missouri...Trust you guys to claim the garden of Eden was on your continent...........
I am tempted to think that whole of the Earth was - and is - the garden of Eden.....only now it is called heaven; just because we can't see it doesn't mean that it isn't there.
I feeling of peace determines what is right and what is wrong.Okay so in place of proof, what lead you to this belief as opposed to another? Is it a feeling of rightness (Can't think of how else to put it) or is there something else?
I have taken into account that the Garden could have stretched forth into all of North America and/or the world...Right continent, wrong state. I was born 165 miles from the Garden of Eden, where the Almighty created humankind on the banks of the Apalachicola River in Liberty County, Florida.
I know I've posted this before (maybe even in this thread), but you might enjoy this article by Hugh Nibley: Before Adam - Maxwell Institute PapersIn the D&C it states that the planet closest to the place where god dwells is named Kolob, and that one planetary Day for Kolob is 1000 Years here on earth.
It was prophesied that Christ will come in the Meridian of Time (transtion from BC to AD) then if you take that into consideration and if the life expectancy of our planet is indeed 7000 Years, and Christ came in the center, life woul have begun at 3500 B.C. And then 3500 AD is when the great judgement will come to pass.
Now subtract a thousand years for the millenium of peace where christ will reign. you have 2500 AD.
there have also been prophesies about those days being shotened because of the wickedness of man and such, though i don't remember where it is or where to look, maybe FFH knows?
anyways, if the earth is nearly 13000 years old (Which i do believe) we still have no idea when christ will come but will come before 2500 A.D.
The questions most commonly asked are: When did it happen? How long did it take? Our texts make it very clear that we are not to measure the time and periods involved by our chronometers and calendars. Until Adam underwent that fatal change of habitat, body chemistry, diet, and psyche that went with the Fall, nothing is to be measured in our years, "for the Gods had not appointed unto Adam his reckoning." (Abraham 5:13.) Until then, time is measured from their point of view, not ours. As far as we are concerned it can be any time, and there would be no point to insisting on this again and again if all we had to do to convert their time to our time was multiply our years by 365,000. Theirs was a different time. The only numbers we are given designated the phases of periods of creation: "and this was the second time" (Abraham 4:8), "and it was the third time" (4:13), and so on. The periods are numbered but never measured. The Gods called them "days," but the text is at great pains to make clear that it was day and night from their point of view, when our time had not yet been appointed. "And the Gods called the light Day, and the darkness they called Night. And . . . from the evening until morning they called night; . . . and this was the first, or the beginning, of that which they called day and night. (Abraham 4:5.) Doctrine and Covenants 130:45 explains that "the reckoning of God's time, angel's time, prophet's time, and man's time [is] according to the planet on which they reside." That implies different time schemes at least. In moving from one system to another one also changes one's timing. "There are no angels who minister to this earth but those who do belong or have belonged to it. (D&C 130:5.)
"It was from morning until evening that they called day; and it was the fifth time." (Abraham 4:23.) How long is such a time? In the "fourth time," we read, "the Gods watched those things which they had ordered until they obeyed." (Abraham 4:19, 18.) That important word "until" tells us two things: (1) that they took all the time that was necessary, no matter how long it might have been, measuring the period in terms not of a terminal date but in terms of the requirements of the task; (2) "until" means up till a certain time, but not thereafter. When things were running smoothly, they were left on their own, which implies a shift from one time-scale to another. When, for example, "the Gods prepared the earth to bring forth" (Abraham 4:24), after they had prepared the waters to do the same long before, how long do you think that took? Again, the record is deliberately vague.
Yes I do. The continents more very slowly, 1cm a year, meaning it wold take a ridiculously long time for the continents to separateYou have absolutely no proof of the continents taking a gazillion years to move...
Fountains of the dep? You mean the giga tons of molten rock beneath the continents?During the flood, the earth tilted on it's axis, the continents broke apart and were flooded by "the fountains of the deep" (the waters beneath the surface of the continents), due to the shifting of the earth's axis...
You have no proof the earth has EVER tilted on its axis. If it did, there would be rapid climate change. Also, the only way for the earth's axis to change is for the moon to disappear.The continents drifted apart during the time of the flood, when the earth shifted/tilted on it's axis..
It probably sounds more like heresy to you.Well that's just how evolution theories sound to me.
I've already refuted this in an earlier post...Soyleche said:I know I've posted this before (maybe even in this thread), but you might enjoy this article by Hugh Nibley: Before Adam - Maxwell Institute Papers
Finally someone who knows their scriptures and understands the 13,000 year old earth interpretation and that one day does indeed equal a 1000 years in ratio to where God dwells.In the D&C it states that the planet closest to the place where god dwells is named Kolob, and that one planetary Day for Kolob is 1000 Years here on earth.
It was prophesied that Christ will come in the Meridian of Time (transtion from BC to AD) then if you take that into consideration and if the life expectancy of our planet is indeed 7000 Years, and Christ came in the center, life woul have begun at 3500 B.C. And then 3500 AD is when the great judgement will come to pass.
Now subtract a thousand years for the millenium of peace where christ will reign. you have 2500 AD.
there have also been prophesies about those days being shotened because of the wickedness of man and such, though i don't remember where it is or where to look, maybe FFH knows?
anyways, if the earth is nearly 13000 years old (Which i do believe) we still have no idea when christ will come but will come before 2500 A.D.
I've already refuted this in an earlier post...
Hugh has his own theories and interpretations of what scriptures actually say.....
He's a mumbler at best...
Yes, and he teaches many doctrines of men, mingled with scripture..One our greatest minds is a 'mumbler'?
Sense enough to read scriptures myself and find out what they really say...Someday, I do hope you get some sense knocked into that head of yours.
Yes, and teaches many doctrines of men, mingled with scripture..
Again, so profound, I'll need to ponder that...keep your trap .
I'll say it again, Hugh is a mumbler...with his own theories and interpretations of what he supposedly thinks many scriptures are saying..let someone who has actually done real scientific research on the subject explain it
Hugh is a mumbler...with his own theories and interpretations of what he supposedly thinks many scriptures are saying..
Yeah, I know what you think of it. Maybe that's why I addressed the post to someone else.I've already refuted this in an earlier post...
Hugh has his own theories and interpretations of what scriptures actually say.....
He's a mumbler at best...
Good - we are on the same track now. 13,000 years, plus or minus a few billion, and we've got itA 13,000 year old earth is a basic time frame, plus or minues whatever amount of years...