-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The first living thing could not have come into being by random chance, therefore, God Almighty created all things. Just 1 proof.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Why do fish drown in water much?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
subduction said they killed Nemo.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nope. You tried to kill Nemo. He is in reality still alive. Which of course means that there was no flood.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You are without knowledge and deceived.
I already proved the flood also.
RIP evolution.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Thank you for admitting that you are wrong.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
What was the first living thing and what features did it have?
Biological evolution. The basic definition is a change in allele frequencies in a population over time. It has been observed numerous times.
Examples include the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. The develop of resistance by a number of different species of insects to insecticides. The same for the development of herbicide resistance in species of plants of economic importance, what we often call weeds.
More interesting still are observations of speciation. Examples include speciation in plants, including a two in the genus Tragopogon, and recent species of Galeopsis tetrahit, Adiantum pedatum and other examples in plants. These evolved through hybridization and ploidy.
In animals, speciation has been observed in the insects Drosophila, Musca, Rhagoletis, Tribolium and in a polychaete worm.
The Lenski experiment has resulted in what may likely be a new species of bacteria, depending on how species are defined in bacteria. The current state of bacterial taxonomy is in flux.
It is more difficult to note in vertebrates due to the long generation times and relatively long gestation times.
However, the Cichlid species superflock in Lake Victoria is an example of relatively rapid evolution in vertebrates resulting in as many as 700 endemic species in about 15,000 years due to adaptive radiation into newly formed niches resulting from the formation of the lake from a grassland stream about 15,000 years ago.
In notothenioid fish, the anti-freeze protein is derived from a gene duplication of a gene for a digestive enzyme. This protein allows the fish to survive the frigid Antarctic seas.
Examination of the fossil record is an observation of phenotypic changes in the fossilized animals and plants over time.
Examination of chromosomes and genes provides observations of evolution.
These observations of evolution are evidence supporting the theory.
Speciation is not known to be a common event and can take many 100's of thousands of years, but the rates vary by selection and reproductive capacity of the species invovled.
Last edited:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
And once again you use your God does not exist argument.
Don't trust me, ask others if your "logic" can be used to disprove God in the same way.
When you debate like that it makes me want to put an upper limit of twelve on your age.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
It is my opinion you are being far to generous,
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
What do make of the results of the 1980 Mount Saint Helen’s eruption?
Here it is . See the rock layers? And notice the carved out canyon. Just like the Grand Canyon. Obviously on a small local scale.
Remembering Mount St. Helens 35 Years Later
The volcano’s main 1980 eruption filled in an entire valley with hundreds of feet of sediment. Another smaller eruption event deposited more material on top of that, and then a third deposition occurred in 1982. Later, a catastrophic flood of snowmelt water and muddy debris tore a gash through...
I answered that question a long time ago.
WrongWhat do make of the results of the 1980 Mount Saint Helen’s eruption?
Here it is . See the rock layers? And notice the carved out canyon. Just like the Grand Canyon. Obviously on a small local scale.
Remembering Mount St. Helens 35 Years Later
The volcano’s main 1980 eruption filled in an entire valley with hundreds of feet of sediment. Another smaller eruption event deposited more material on top of that, and then a third deposition occurred in 1982. Later, a catastrophic flood of snowmelt water and muddy debris tore a gash through...www.icr.org
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Wow what a logical and scientific rebuttal.
And what pray tell is wrong about it?
Rock layers and a carved out canyon just like the Grand Canyon.
Did you see had inaccurate the radio active dating using even an isochron was?
Evolution and billions of years are false.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Refuted by this, too bad that you do not understand:What do make of the results of the 1980 Mount Saint Helen’s eruption?
Here it is . See the rock layers? And notice the carved out canyon. Just like the Grand Canyon. Obviously on a small local scale.
Remembering Mount St. Helens 35 Years Later
The volcano’s main 1980 eruption filled in an entire valley with hundreds of feet of sediment. Another smaller eruption event deposited more material on top of that, and then a third deposition occurred in 1982. Later, a catastrophic flood of snowmelt water and muddy debris tore a gash through...
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
A wave of your hands is not a refutation.
Evolution and billions of years are falsified forever yet again.
Behold the awesome power of God and the evidence of the worldwide flood.
Most rock layers around the world are deposited by one event.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That was not a wave of my hands. I have invited you to discuss that several times. If you won't discuss it you lose by default.
If you understood anything about geology, if you understood the scientific method, if you understood the concept of evidence, you would see that that picture refutes your claims.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
I see you do not understand the material you present as evidence that does not say what you claim it says.What do make of the results of the 1980 Mount Saint Helen’s eruption?
Here it is . See the rock layers? And notice the carved out canyon. Just like the Grand Canyon. Obviously on a small local scale.
Remembering Mount St. Helens 35 Years Later
The volcano’s main 1980 eruption filled in an entire valley with hundreds of feet of sediment. Another smaller eruption event deposited more material on top of that, and then a third deposition occurred in 1982. Later, a catastrophic flood of snowmelt water and muddy debris tore a gash through...
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I might as well present this picture of his "Grand Canyon" here. There is on steep wall where it eroded into the old valley a bit. besides that the ash was only 20 meters or about 65 feet deep:
