Really? would you care to divulge this evidence?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The flood
- Thread starter Dan4reason
- Start date
Really? would you care to divulge this evidence?
If you publically apologise for calling me a liar, I might. If not...dream on. Currently I don't see you as someone to debate with, I see you as an enemy of the faith of Christianity. A wolf in tigers clothing! It's that obvious.
The phrase is, wolf in sheeps clothing. Tiger's can be pretty dangerous too.
You havent answered the question that preceeded this statement. But the evidence is already out there, you guys only demonstate that you have already rejected it.
"Science" admitted decades ago, the tools they where using as Evidence for proving evolution where inadequate and inconclusive. You guys are cult members, not scientists. Your text is propoganda not science.
Last edited:
Yes I know but he's wearing a cartoon tiger suit, he must have eaten the sheep.
What question? Would you mind re-stating the question? I don't remember you asking me a question.
David M
Well-Known Member
In other words you don't have any of this scientific evidence that you were talking about, and you are still dodging the question on your uniformitarianism claims.
And aren't you forgetting your inability to find this supposed publication by the French Academy of Science, produce that with an explanation of at least some of these "51 facts" and you might get an apology on that matter.
Unless you start providing more than facile assertions the only conclusion anyone can draw is that all you are doing is parroting the usual falsehoods and malicious ignorance promulgated by most YECs.
Yes I do mind. You're good at making comments on posts I've made to others, so obviously you read what I'm saying. Go back and read it agian.
Listen Tiger, the OP is a facile assertion that the line drawing proves Evolution, so when I see more than facile assertions from you're camp and less of the vile attitudes, I'll stop mincing about with you mincers.
Your comment was directed at me. You should go back and read your post.
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
The flood an evolution don't exactly have much in common. This is the third time i've said this.
Post 234 was not directed at you. Until you evolve a brain, I shall claim this as further proof that evolution is baulderdash.
Last edited:
AntEmpire
Active Member
The word for land and world are the same/similar in the original texts. So was it a flood of the world or a flood of the land?
I saw a good theory that Noah was a merchant, who had a boat with livestock and his family, then there was a large flood, his family survived and his heathen boat-less neighbors died. Add years and it becomes a taller tale about rainbows and a world flood. Made sense to me anyway
I saw a good theory that Noah was a merchant, who had a boat with livestock and his family, then there was a large flood, his family survived and his heathen boat-less neighbors died. Add years and it becomes a taller tale about rainbows and a world flood. Made sense to me anyway
outhouse
Atheistically
that I could believe
if that was the case though it would be more proof of the fiction contained in genesis
Fossil Grave yards
Why are fish fossil's found on Mountain peaks? (Flood that covered the whole earth)
How could 800,000 million skeltons of vertabrate animals be entombed together in the Karroo formation (South Africa?) (Catastrophic flood)
How and why were five million mammoths of siberia frozen to death in solid ice? (Flood)
How is it that in the water-laid "bone-bed" at Agate Springs, Nebraska, fossil are found of rhinocerous, camel, giant boar, and numerous other animals not indigenous to America? (Flood Deluge)
All of the above phenomena refute Uniformitarianism and point to the extreme possibilty of the world wide deluge for their cause. (oh I better qualify that remark: To a rational sane mind, that is)
Last edited:
outhouse
Atheistically
please get a real education
NPS: Nature & Science» Geology Resources Division
Provenance study of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic Elliot Formation, main Karoo Basin, South Africa -- Bordy et al. 107 (4): 587 -- South African Journal of Geology
if all of the fossils of animals in the Karroo Formation had been alive at one time, were drowned during the flood of Noah, and ended up evenly spaced around the entire land surface of the earth, there would be 21 animals per acre. 2 A very conservative estimate is that there are about 100 fossils elsewhere on earth for each fossil in the Karroo Formation in Africa. Thus, assuming that all of these animals were evenly distributed, there would have been over 2,100 living animals per acre of land - "ranging from tiny shrews to immense dinosaurs" when the flood hit. This is clearly impossible.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/oldearth2.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammoth
Another theory suggests that mammoths may have fallen victim to an infectious disease. A combination of climate change and hunting by humans has been suggested as the most likely explanation for their extinction.
that took 5 minutes to bust your myth
NPS: Nature & Science» Geology Resources Division
Provenance study of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic Elliot Formation, main Karoo Basin, South Africa -- Bordy et al. 107 (4): 587 -- South African Journal of Geology
if all of the fossils of animals in the Karroo Formation had been alive at one time, were drowned during the flood of Noah, and ended up evenly spaced around the entire land surface of the earth, there would be 21 animals per acre. 2 A very conservative estimate is that there are about 100 fossils elsewhere on earth for each fossil in the Karroo Formation in Africa. Thus, assuming that all of these animals were evenly distributed, there would have been over 2,100 living animals per acre of land - "ranging from tiny shrews to immense dinosaurs" when the flood hit. This is clearly impossible.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/oldearth2.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammoth
Another theory suggests that mammoths may have fallen victim to an infectious disease. A combination of climate change and hunting by humans has been suggested as the most likely explanation for their extinction.
that took 5 minutes to bust your myth
Last edited:
They are not evenly dispersed, nor are the 5 million mammoths which would signify a mass movement in attempt at survival. And what do you mean "IF" all the fossils where alive at some time. Are these people on CRACK? This is one catastrophic event. Not uniformity
This is exactly why it's a waste of time posting evidence.
5 minutes of googling, sheesh thats a bit slow mate. Your education is 5 minutes old. Hah!
Last edited:
AntEmpire
Active Member
Proof that its fiction or proof that it is fiction derived from actual events?
I would say (even as a non-believer) there is always some truth in stories even the garden of eden, I believe it is a story of how man moved from being a hunter-gatherer to being a working agricultural man.
Last edited:
Dan4reason
Facts not Faith
You do not have to tell me about all your lines of evidence, maybe one or two. So give me some of your strongest points and argue for them. You must provide evidence for your claims, that is the whole point of this thread.
I am unaware of what uniformitarianism is exactly and what that has got to do with evolution. It seems like different people define it differently. I have a very vague understanding of the "evidence" for the flood.