As I suspected, obviously they didnt look very hard, I found it in five minutes.
No you didn't. See below.
I also found the quote you cut and pasted that said it couldnt be found, about as quick as you found it, probably about 1 minute.
Then why did you claim it didn't "actually explain how and where they looked for it, or if in actural fact they even bothered to look." The link I provided did contain that information as you have just confirmed. Which makes your statement above a lie.
Which potentially makes you guilty of libel for accusing me of lying mutiple times,
You did lie when you said it didn't "actually explain how and where they looked for it, or if in actural fact they even bothered to look."
not to mention slandering my character in a public forum. Just remember, satan is the accuser of the brethern and the father of all lies. Whatever spirit operates within you, is certainly not Christian, in my opinion.
Your opinion is irrelevant. Stop posting lies and I will stop pointing them out.
This document was not published by the French Academy of Science (which means their reply still looks to be correct). It was published in Geneva by The Helvetic Society which was Swiss. What you have found is a french translation of a Swiss publication.
So still no evidence that the French Academy of Science published a list of 51 science facts that controverted the word of God.
Now that you have found
a document published in that year if you want to claim that this contains these 51 facts perhaps you would like to show us exactly where these 51 science facts that you mentioned are. Because no such article is listed in the contents.
Just for a laugh I translated the scientific view on the Origin of Mankind starting on page 33 (I haven't done french for 28 years so I had to use a translator so its rather stilted)
Les êtres organisés qui peuplent la terre, ne doivent leur formation et leur propagation qu'à une action combinée, inhérente aux choses elles-mêmes, de forces naturelles et de la matière.
Les germes de tout ce qui vit portent en eux-mêmes de tout éternité l'idée de l'espèce et sont soumis à l'influence de certaines circonstances extérieures existant dans la masse informe de vapeurs d'où est sortie la terre solide, ou répandues dans les espaces cosmiques; et lorsqu'après la formation et le refroidisement de la terre, ils sont venus se déposer à sa surface, ceux-là seulement ont été fécondés et développés qui par hasard se sont précisément trouvés sons l'influence une et générale de conditions extérieures nécessaires à leur développement.
Voici proprement le procédé: C'est du limon primitivement formé des atomes éternels de la matière que, par un combinaison (c'est l'expression de Buchner; Vogt l'apelle un coup de dés) soit nécessaire, soit fortitude, la première production sont sorties d'abord les formes végétales, puis les formes animales qui, par une suite infinie de transformations (métamorphoses) ont enfin abouti au singe.
Le premier homme est sorti du genre singe; il a sucé son premier lait à la mamelle d'une guenon. L'homme est l'être sensible par excellence. I'l n'y a point de lien spirituel entre les hommes; la convenance extérieure seule les unit. Chacun est à soi-même son prochain.
The organized beings who populate the earth, owe their training and their spread only in a combined, inherent action in very things, of natural force and material.
The germs of all that saw carry the idea of kind in themselves of very eternity and are subjected to influence of certain outside circumstances existing in the shapeless mass of steam where from the solid earth went out, or spread in the cosmic areas; and when after training and cooling of the earth, they came to settle in his surface, those only were fertilized and developed who incidentally belong precisely found sounds influence one and dress rehearsal of outside conditions necessary for their development.
Here is properly technique: It is some alluvium originally formed by the endless atoms of material that, by one combination (it is expression of Buchner; Vogt calls it a blow of dices) either necessary, or fortitude, the first production plant forms went out first, then animal forms which, by an infinite suite of transformations (transformations) finally led to the monkey.
The first man went out of type ape; it sucked its first milk in the udder of one female monkey. The man is the sensitive being par excellence. There is no spiritual link between the men; the only outside convenience joins them. Each belongs to oneself his fellow.
Before anyone points out that apes are not monkeys in Zoology monkeys used to comprise of old world monkeys, new world monkeys and apes.
Rather simplistic but not too far off the mark and the central concept that life evolved in earth and the humans evolved from apes is still accepted by science and still refutes the YEC interpretation of the bible.
The following points highlight the inadequacy of Uniformitarianism, which is a must for Evolution to hold water.
1 Volcanism and Igneous Rocks
2. Mountains
3. Continental Ice Sheets
4. Sedimentation
5. Fossil Grave Yards
6. Coal Beds
7. Foot prints of extinct Animals
8. Living Fossils
9. Rock Formations out of Sequence
All of the above are fully explained by Uniformitarianism. Uniformitarianism states that the same natural laws and processes that operate in the universe now, have always operated.
