Skwim
Veteran Member
"Literal stupid" kicking in when the defense of scripture is pretty much blown away. Understood.We can be literal. Just not so literal as to be stupid.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"Literal stupid" kicking in when the defense of scripture is pretty much blown away. Understood.We can be literal. Just not so literal as to be stupid.
It doesn't break, it tears and I doubt very much that study included minors which is generally who was getting married back then.
And although there is no 100% infallible test, there are tests, obviously.
Colloquial description notwithstanding, I've already told you the test did include minors. It says right there.
It's not that it's just fallible, it's wrong more than half the time. You'd get better determination through a coin flip.
Virginity was apparently important to them back then, and bleeding was a good indicator of it.
God said that adulterers and those who had pre-marital sex are sinners, And that's it. The whole virgin blood cloth thing was just the Jews best attempt at determining such and was not a specific command, edict or instruction from God Himself.
So your OP is moot at best. Either way
Don't you think it's a bit odd? All this emphasis on female virginity?I'm happy for you...?
Yeah, you know something, you're right. 9 verses out of over 5,800 (in the Pentateuch) does seem overly emphatic.Don't you think it's a bit odd? All this emphasis on female virginity?
That doesn't really answer the question though. There is an emphasis on female sexuality, given the discussion being had here.Yeah, you know something, you're right. 9 verses out of over 5,800 (in the Pentateuch) does seem overly emphatic.
Is the emphasis textual or is the emphasis based on the attention people are giving to the limited textual resources?That doesn't really answer the question though. There is an emphasis on female sexuality, given the discussion being had here.
There is no such thing as reasonable or accurate virginity testing for women.
Nice slight of hand.That doesn't really answer the question though. There is an emphasis on female sexuality, given the discussion being had here.
Except it wasn't a good indication, less accurate than a coin flip.
So you're saying that the old covenant was not from God, but a product of man and their shortcomings?
No it is not. That is a myth. It really is that simple.But finding blood on the sheet is a strong indicator that she was a virgin.
If it all is not from God, which part is and which part isn't? And, why do some people refer to it as "The Word of God"? So who do you think wrote Deuteronomy and told the people to stone a non-virgin? It sure seems as if they were speaking as if God gave them those instructions? If it were just a bunch of old men trying to scare woman not to fool around and wrote it in such a way as to make it seem like it was a command from God, then that makes a lot of sense. But, if God dictated it to some old man, and told him that those that fail the virginity test must be stoned, then can we trust such a God? You seem like a strong believer, so how do you decide where it's God giving a command and when it's just a bunch of men making some rules up as they go?
This is a good point when you consider the origin of Deuteronomy. It was supposedly "found" in 621 BC and the guy who "found" it basically said "see, all the things I have been telling you are written down here in this ancient book of scripture that no one has ever heard of before". The skeptic in me finds that interesting.If it all is not from God, which part is and which part isn't? And, why do some people refer to it as "The Word of God"? So who do you think wrote Deuteronomy and told the people to stone a non-virgin? It sure seems as if they were speaking as if God gave them those instructions? If it were just a bunch of old men trying to scare woman not to fool around and wrote it in such a way as to make it seem like it was a command from God, then that makes a lot of sense. But, if God dictated it to some old man, and told him that those that fail the virginity test must be stoned, then can we trust such a God? You seem like a strong believer, so how do you decide where it's God giving a command and when it's just a bunch of men making some rules up as they go?
The parts that say they're from God and the parts that you know, don't.
God didn't command the virginity test, He just commanded His people not to have pre-marital/extra-marital sex and His people went on to perform what they thought were virginity tests as their way of keeping His command. They interpreted it as such, and wrote it as such and performed as such but that doesn't mean God commanded as such.
It is a revolting practice, but when one considers all the other dastardly, and outright heinous things god did it doesn't come as any surprise. It's almost as if god hates people---concocting absurd reasons to make them suffer. That people can turn a blind eye to these abominations and instead venerate such a god is beyond reason. My reason anyway.I find it appalling that any god would command any such revolting practice at all.
The old covenant is all of the Torah (law) including the core 10 commandments and the rest of Moses law. Jesus does not refer to the law of Moses as something not from God, but calls the 10 commandments part of Moses law, brought through Moses to Israel, establishing their covenant. This wasn't just a recording of what people did and I really do not know of many people who think, for example, levitical law was merely something they did, not ordained by God. Deuteronical law is the same.
And part of the old covenant by God through Moses given to the Israelites included stoning women who failed virginity checks at marriage.
I feel like I already answered this. The scripture itself, if the vast majority of both Jewish and Christian scholarship is right, IS a commandment from God and instruction on how to preform. Just like the rest of the Mosaic law is.Let's put this to rest once and for all.
Show me scripture that is of God Himself commanding and/or instructing His people to perform virginity checks and/or how to perform them.
Because as far as I am aware, The only relevant thing God commanded His people to do was refrain from pre-martial and extra-marital sex.
I feel like I already answered this. The scripture itself, if the vast majority of both Jewish and Christian scholarship is right, IS a commandment from God and instruction on how to preform. Just like the rest of the Mosaic law is.