fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
Nope.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Jesus Myth
- Thread starter fallingblood
- Start date
- Status
fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
You beat me to it.
fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
Seriously? I definitely would say neither.
fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
Do you really have to wait for my assessment? You should know by now that without reading what I've stated in the past you won't get far.
haha this is more true than you realize.
A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
Any work by Plutarch. Perhaps the E at Delphi?
fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
:faint: Yes, your substantive posts have been a real help. Because you know, I love the facepalm impression that I have gotten after reading so many of your posts.
I didn't mean to interrupt your reading of your own thread, my apologies.
A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
*Pausanias also comes to mind... but he is a bit later.
fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
Not the consensus at all. Basically, all but a handful of scholars believe that Josephus wrote about Jesus.
No, yes, no.
fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
What does victory have to do with reading my posts? You reading my posts would just be easier for all involved. This way, you wouldn't have to make asinine responses.
As for your question (which again shows that you have not even tried to read what I have said so far), yes.
AmbiguousGuy
Well-Known Member
I read the other day about a tiny jellyfish which is essentially immortal -- the only animal on the planet which can live forever. Something about reverting to its juvenile stage when it comes under stress. (Yeah -- a proper straight line, folks.)
Tough question: Eternity without a brain? Or brainiac for a single season?
We should be happy either way, I guess, considering that some of us get the short ends of both sticks.
fallingblood
Agnostic Theist
I'm sure you are. Clearly you have a problem reading, and I'm sure since you've done no research, most of this goes over your head. I'd be bored to if I didn't understand anything.
what goes over my head... thank you.
A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
My god I can't wait until I can corrupt young minds.
AmbiguousGuy
Well-Known Member
Who can say about scholarly consensus. It's usually just another arguing point. I'll just say that over the years, I've heard enough conservative Christians concede the probable fakery that I hold a fairly stout opinion on its illegitimacy now.
Sure, I've mostly heard the same thing. But I've never engaged the debate on John's historicity and was curious whether outhouse would indulge me.
And I get a little tired of being sent to favorite webpages, or told that if I were only as smart as my opponent, I would believe just as he believes.
outhouse
Atheistically
you admit to not doing the work
you admit to not reading the whole wiki link.
from past debates with you it seems like a waist of my time
wiki is not my only source, but it does serve as quick refference to post the most popular opinions as well it tells left and the right viewpoints
Scholars? and anyone who bothers to read what they have to say?
You consider identification as a Conservative Christian a credential?
Sure, I've mostly heard the same thing. But I've never engaged the debate on John's historicity and was curious whether outhouse would indulge me.
And I get a little tired of being sent to favorite webpages, or told that if I were only as smart as my opponent, I would believe just as he believes.
Maybe you should seek out dumber opponents.
which part of each source describes historical jesus and which part describes biblical jesus?
- Status