The last post is the WINNER!

[Thief]

I hereby nullify and void and past, present, and future wins.

and you post of yourself

 

[savagewind]

I'm confused.

 

[Wu Wei]

Same old song and dance.

 

[Thief]

and once more into the breech.....

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

once more you lose

 

[sun rise]

I'm confused.

Good. You understand the situation.

 

[Wu Wei]

I just ate a cookie

 

[sun rise]

I just lost more weight by not eating cookies etc.

 

[Wu Wei]

They are healthy, vegan, low sugar, gluten free, cookies...and the surprising thing is....they actually taste good

 

[savagewind]

I am still waiting.

 

[Wu Wei]

waiting for what?

 

[savagewind]

I think someone someday might give me an answer to my premise. Highly unlikely, but possible, imo.

 

[Wu Wei]

What is your premise?

 

[savagewind]

What is your premise?

LOL. I believe Daniel 2:44 doesn't say that God's Kingdom will crush the World's kingdoms, but that the World's kingdoms seem to most people to have crushed God's Kingdom, but that it really isn't crushed. In Jesus Christ' name.

 

[savagewind]

People are waiting for God to crush the rest of them....so many people!....instead of proving that The God really and actually IS Love.

What kind of love is it is me or nothing? Maybe you have to read that twice........or more. OMG!

Maybe some punctuation might help? What kind of love is 'it is me or nothing'? It is no kind of love.

 

[Wu Wei]

LOL. I believe Daniel 2:44 doesn't say that God's Kingdom will crush the World's kingdoms, but that the World's kingdoms seem to most people to have crushed God's Kingdom, but that it really isn't crushed. In Jesus Christ' name.

Thank you for telling me, I am not the person to answer this to have this type of discussion, I am simply not qualified

 

[savagewind]

Thank you for telling me, I am not the person to answer this to have this type of discussion, I am simply not qualified

I know and neither am I qualified to challenge their ideas of what the Bible really teaches.
I know of no one who is like me who believes what was written, but that what we have is NOT what was written. I believe in restoring what was written. There is no one else.

 

[sun rise]

I know and neither am I qualified to challenge their ideas of what the Bible really teaches.
I know of no one who is like me who believes what was written, but that what we have is NOT what was written. I believe in restoring what was written. There is no one else.

Aw shucks. I was going to try to interpret that verse by using my pre-conceived idea of what I think it should mean.

But I will write that to me the Bible contains the truth but is not "the" truth.

 

[Wu Wei]

I know and neither am I qualified to challenge their ideas of what the Bible really teaches.
I know of no one who is like me who believes what was written, but that what we have is NOT what was written. I believe in restoring what was written. There is no one else.

There is a book that talks about what we have as the Bible as compared to what may have originally been written. I just finished it, but be careful, it could change a lot of what you think. It is based on scholarly research on the topic

Misquoting Jesus by Bart D. Ehrman

 

[sun rise]

There is a book that talks about what we have as the Bible as compared to what may have originally been written. I just finished it, but be careful, it could change a lot of what you think. It is based on scholarly research on the topic

Misquoting Jesus by Bart D. Ehrman

Wandering around various web sites after a search on that title, I found one which reinforces my notion that the Bible is not to be read as being unadulterated over time. Or to unwrap the negatives, that the Bible has been altered accidentally or deliberately over time. List of New Testament verses not included in modern English translations - Wikipedia