Of course!
"Obnoxiousest" would be a great moniker.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The last post is the WINNER!
- Thread starter ninerbuff
- Start date
"Obnoxiousest" would be a great moniker.
And for you, "Pickanickbasketstealingest".
Make Revoltistan adequate again.
Daemon Sophic
Avatar in flux
Why did you use the word “again”?
He channels someone. But in his case, "again" is incorrect as you correctly noted.
We're aiming to be as adequate as we once were.
(We believe in achievable goals. "Great" is too much.)
Just because of that, Revoltistan has enacted a leash law for all you curs!
I think your goal is to make revoltistan grate again by grating on us expecting us to be gratefull.
From one who doesn't even know to capitalize a proper name.
Pbbbbbtttt!
Shrew
Active Member
That song is great.
Yay who'd have thought.
There's something very improper about revoltistan. Now if you make it a proper place, it would be different.
Wu Wei
ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
You are of course assuming that it was adequate at one time prior to this......
Adequate to annoy people, perhaps?
We refer to the period when we were adequate (I think it was a Tuesday) as our "tin age".