Neither was Reagan when he was in office.
It seems harsh to mock someone out of power & suffering from a terrible disease.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Liberal Class vs. The Working Class: The Party is Over!
- Thread starter CynthiaCypher
- Start date
It seems harsh to mock someone out of power & suffering from a terrible disease.
Will Campbell
Member
Like I said....Nancy and her astrologer took care of things.
What does this mean?
Will Campbell
Member
White House Confirms Reagans Follow Astrology, Up to a Point - NYTimes.com
White House Confirms Reagans Follow Astrology:
By STEVEN V. ROBERTS, Special to the New York Times
Published: May 4, 1988
President Reagan and his wife, Nancy, are both deeply interested in astrology, the White House spokesman, Marlin Fitzwater, said today, and two former White House officials said Mrs. Reagan's concerns had influenced the scheduling of important events.
A California astrologer said she had been consulted by the Reagans regarding key White House decisions, but Mr. Reagan said astrology had not influenced policy.
Followers of astrology believe the alignment of stars and planets influences human affairs. Such people consult charts, based on their birth dates, for clues concerning many decisions.
Mr. Fitzwater said Mrs. Reagan is particularly worried about the impact astrological portents can have on her husband's safety. But he declined to say exactly how Mrs. Reagan had used astrological information.
From your linked article....
Until we have an atheistic/agnostic prez, the supernatural will have a role in their lives.
Hmmmmm....looking at the differences between Raygun & Obama, I'm
tempted to give the latter a coupon good free one free astrology reading.
At least they weren't consulting the clergy.....or were they?
Until we have an atheistic/agnostic prez, the supernatural will have a role in their lives.
Hmmmmm....looking at the differences between Raygun & Obama, I'm
tempted to give the latter a coupon good free one free astrology reading.
Will Campbell
Member
The T Party and Republicans have been all over president "Black" in stein since day one for his government spending. I guess they don't count a war as spending....he's ended one and is working on the other......just coincidently the longest war this country has ever been involved in. You wanna know the truth? Take a gander:
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4o7ayCd0i1qbf05e.png
As I've said, even Obama isn't all bad.
Consider:
Had McCain won, would we be at war with Iran right now?
Last edited:
Removing the pre-existing condition problem is a good thing, but honestly, the working class cannot afford the premiums and high deductibles much less the remaining 20% of the hospital bill. Instead of owing 100K they owe say 25K still something they cannot afford to pay.
Same for the Liberal war on coal. Instead of a 150 dollar electric bill they now owe a 450 dollar utility bill.
The working class can't afford the additional expense to be green.
Same with raising minimum wage, they need to be gainfully employed not getting a raise working for minimum wage.
spoken like a true Liberal, (not calling you one) point the finger at the other guy when you cannot defend a position.
Truth is both parties SUCK.
Will Campbell
Member
Iran, Syria, N. Korea, Ukraine...pick one
I did....I picked Iran.
But if it's multiple choice, I'd fear he might go after Syria & Ukraine too.
If so, it would be time to buy more Halliburton stock LOL
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Pick one?! Is there a war that McCain hasn't wanted us to get into?
Probably.
While we could still win.
Obama is putting it off until it's a a total losing proposition. Rather like his inability to take on Congress. Obama is a politically correct dweeb who doesn't have what it takes to effectively oppose the power elite. Murdoch, Koch's, etc. I see all those people as indistinguishable from Assad, Putin, and whoever is now running the Mexican drug cartels.
They are all in it for power and Obama has nothing to say about anything important.
I wish I had supported the ***** hilarry. I didn't like her. But she gets things done.
Getting it done is what matters. Not what flavor of lies you tell before getting power.
Tom
We'd win against Iran? We didn't win in Iraq or Afghanistan.
And what has Hillary actually accomplished?
CynthiaCypher
Well-Known Member
The objective of our foriegn adventure is not to win. It is to profit.
I keep asking that. What have the liberal elite done for the working class lately?
Will Campbell
Member
Cheney advocated war in Iraq all the way back to the late 90's. He cleared an estimated $25 million on his holdings while 4500 young Americans died and another 35.000 were wounded. That guy got five deferments to stay out of Vietnam. He should be executed or at least deported.
Let Hillary (& others), who voted for the war, suffer the same fate.
What?
Get rich by being a powerful US politician?
She'd have a way to go to match Cheney. But as riding the government gravy train goes, she and Bill are doing better than the other 99%.
Tom
We're in trouble taking on Iran now that the USA has squandered the military on Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran is the real threat. But Hillery and a bunch of other dufouses believed the lies told by Cheney, Rumsfeld, wolfowitz, and their ilk.
So now Iran has won the war in Iraq.
Carterish Christian wieny that Obama is at least he managed the symbolic victory of offing ObL.
Tom