• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Logic of God

waitasec

waitasec

Veteran Member
Thief said:
Your retort is illogical.
This isn't about your fascination with the ill will of Man.
Click to expand...

this is what is illogical

"my belief, requires no evidence, well because it's my belief
while the person who believes his faith justifies flying into buildings requires evidence"

a double standard...

but if it makes you feel better about your belief... :areyoucra
 
Thief

Thief

Rogue Theologian
waitasec said:
this is what is illogical

"my belief, requires no evidence, well because it's my belief
while the person who believes his faith justifies flying into buildings requires evidence"

a double standard...

but if it makes you feel better about your belief... :areyoucra
Click to expand...

In red...illogical.

I believe for cause and reason.
That faith has no proving is inherent.

No fingerprints....no photos...no equations...no repeatable experiment.

But that doesn't mean I lack cause or reason.

(I see you can't drop your fascination for the poor conduct of others.
and you think I can be labeled in the same way.....how illogical.)
 
Last edited:
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Thief said:
I'm placing this thread in debate as it may well turn into one.
But for the most part, what I'm asking is a one statement essay that you believe shows a line of logic.

Pick any thought or feeling you might consider beyond refute.
Support with your cause for belief.

If you can refrain the rebuttal of someone else's essay....that would be good.
This thread is more to declaration than argument.

But should we digress to debate and rebuttal....oh well.
Click to expand...

Simply put-God is.
 
waitasec

waitasec

Veteran Member
Thief said:
In red...illogical.

I believe for cause and reason.
That faith has no proving is inherent.

No fingerprints....no photos...no equations...no repeatable experiment.

But that doesn't mean I lack cause or reason.

(I see you can't drop your fascination for the poor conduct of others.
and you think I can be labeled in the same way.....how illogical.)
Click to expand...

who cares if it's your faith...?
"my belief, requires no evidence, well because it's my belief
while the person who believes his faith justifies flying into buildings requires evidence"

my = i
 
Last edited:
waitasec

waitasec

Veteran Member
Thief said:
And I've already told you...not God's logic or mine.
Click to expand...
wow..you claim to know god's logic.
impressive :areyoucra

Put your shallow labels where they belong.

You do have a nasty fascination for the ill will of Man.
Click to expand...

i'm just worried why people justify it when it comes to religious faith...

actions done in faith which require no evidence is giving license to yahoos...
why would you want to be a part of that?
 
Thief

Thief

Rogue Theologian
waitasec said:
wow..you claim to know god's logic.
impressive :areyoucra



i'm just worried why people justify it when it comes to religious faith...

actions done in faith which require no evidence is giving license to yahoos...
why would you want to be a part of that?
Click to expand...

I'm not a part of that.
 
waitasec

waitasec

Veteran Member
Thief said:
Logic of God first...get it?
Click to expand...
how can you say you know gods logic, by what criteria do you determine you can?
unless you are willing to concede god is man made.
and you obviously don't get the fact that your little mantra of
"faith requires no proof" is self defeated as you hide behind gods logic as if that were proof
:biglaugh:

keep it up this is fun
:popcorn:
 
Thief

Thief

Rogue Theologian
dust1n said:
I've never read a religious text that utilized logic.
Click to expand...

My first exposure was the work of st. Thomas Aquinas.

But the same work also demonstrated that dogmatic belief is difficult to support with logic.
Ironically, His effort to support his belief with as much formal technique as he could muster.....led me to drop dogmatic belief.

Still, logic and reason are found in those people having faith.

What many participants here incorrectly do....
insist in 'proof' tangible.....and if not....then claim the effort "illogical'.
 
waitasec

waitasec

Veteran Member
Thief said:
My first exposure was the work of st. Thomas Aquinas.

But the same work also demonstrated that dogmatic belief is difficult to support with logic.
Ironically, His effort to support his belief with as much formal technique as he could muster.....led me to drop dogmatic belief.

Still, logic and reason are found in those people having faith.

What many participants here incorrectly do....
insist in 'proof' tangible.....and if not....then claim the effort "illogical'.
Click to expand...

logical fallacies and irrationality fall within the boundaries of logic and reason if faith requires no evidence...
 
Thief

Thief

Rogue Theologian
waitasec said:
logical fallacies and irrationality fall within the boundaries of logic and reason if faith requires no evidence...
Click to expand...

And in saying so, you probably will never take that next step up.

Can't see beyond your reach?.....can you?
 
waitasec

waitasec

Veteran Member
Thief said:
And in saying so, you probably will never take that next step up.
Click to expand...
knowing ones limitations is a good thing it allows for one to focus on the important issues

Can't see beyond your reach?.....can you?
Click to expand...

no i can't, nor do i pretend to...unlike, ahem you do.


i don't know about you but chasing my own tail got old in my 20's
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top