Ignatius is only considered a Church father by those who seek to make excuses to not believe Gods Word and break Gods commandments and sin against God.
As expected, you throw the entire church to the curb. So when did the "true" church appear? After the Great Millerite Disappointment? Or perhaps just after the writings of Ellen White?
Putting the teachings and traditions of men outside of the scriptures are against the very warnings of Jesus in Matthew 15:3-9.
Umm... have you read Ignatius's letters? I'm not sure how you can claim he was "outside the scriptures".
Ignatius was certainly against the Judaizers though, but then so was the apostle Paul.
Ignatius is only considered a Church father by those who seek to make excuses to not believe Gods Word and break Gods commandments and sin against God.
This is an unfounded and unsupported judgement against fellow Christians.
The Catholic Church has long held up the authenticity of all the letters of Ignatius from past to present as being truthful. However, in 1886, Presbyterian minister and church historian William Dool Killen published an essay extensively arguing that
none of the epistles attributed to Ignatius were authentic (
Wiki linked). Some however, argue that some letters were authentic and others not.
1886?
While their certainly have been forgeries, the majority of modern scholars accept at least 7 letters as authentic.
The problem here however, is that there is no agreement as to what is genuine and what is not and when we put the teachings and traditions of men above the scriptures we are no longer following God but man.
What teachings? We have no book of Ignatius. We do have his letters which give us an early historical account of the church.
I would also like to challenge you on your use of Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2 and using them to make the claim or statement that these scriptures prove that the Church was transitioning from the Sabbath to the first day of the week.
Sure! That's what the forum is for.
Where does it say that in the scriptures you quoted?
Prior to his crucifixion, Jesus taught in the temples (Matthew 21:12, Luke 4:15)
After the crucifixion, they met
every (not just the Sabbath) day in the temple courts:
Acts 2:42-4743 Everyone was filled with awe at the many wonders and signs performed by the apostles. 44 All the believers were together and had everything in common. 45 They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need. 46
Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts.
Remember, in historic Christian church, there is no "wrong" day to worship. There are traditional days, which generally occur on days we can gather and not work, but there are no "wrong" days. Jesus is Lord, even of 3rd and 4th day.
Which leads us to
Acts 20, where we are meeting on the first day of the week.
7 And
upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight. 8 And there were many lights in the upper chamber, where they were gathered together.
- Lets be honest, nowhere right.
Incorrect. See above.
Lets compared what you posted above and your claim that the last two scriptures prove that the Church was transitioning from Sabbath to the first day of the week with Acts 2:47-48
Compare away my friend.
Acts 2:47-48 46, And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, 47, Praising God, and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
You do realize that Acts 2:47 states they continued DAILY with one accord in the temple, and the Lord added DAILY to those saved. This clearly shows that ANY day is a good day to give praise to God!
So if you want to give the 7th day to the Lord, good for you!
If you want to give the 1st day to the Lord, good for you!
If you want to give the 3rd day to the Lord, good for you!
No day is a bad day.
So as can be proven in the scriptures Gods people met together every day of the week and this also included the first day of the week.
Absolutely!
This did not make every day of the week a holy day of rest and abolish Gods Sabbath commandment .
No one claims it did. Christ is our rest. It is Christ that allows us to give any day acceptable to the Lord. There is no wrong day to pray, and no incorrect day to worship.
“This is the day that the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it.”
– Psalm 118:24
"The steadfast love of the LORD never ceases; his mercies never come to an end; they are new every morning; great is your faithfulness. - Lamentations 3: 22-23
"Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly, or under a compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver." 2 Corinthians 9:
There is nothing in any of these scriptures that state that the Church was transitioning from Sabbath to the first day of the week.
I think our readers can decide this for themselves. We are under no compulsion for a Sabbath.
That is you trying to read into the scriptures what is not written in the scriptures.
I disagree. That is you reading your doctrine into scriptures. I have not problem with your doctrine 3rd Angel. I just don't understand why you would want to yolk us to it when we're already at rest in Christ.
Finally, none of these scriptures make any claims to changing Gods 4th commandment or the obligation to continue keeping the seventh day as a holy day of rest according to Gods 10 commandments .
Probably because there is no obligation to do so.
The proof of this is that everyone of the disciples and Apostles continued keeping the Sabbath as Gods holy day of rest until they died (see Acts of the Apostles 13:14; 13:27; 13:44; 15:21; 16:13; 17:2; 18:4; Revelation 1:10).
Okay, I'll bite. Let's take a look at some of your verses.
Acts
13:14: From Perga they went on to Pisidian Antioch. On the Sabbath they entered the synagogue and sat down.
Paul and his companions go to a synagogue, sit down, and later preach to those in the temple. This is not a gathering of believing Christians on the Sabbath, it is a gathering of Jews as one might expect.
13:27: The people of Jerusalem and their rulers did not recognize Jesus, yet in condemning him they fulfilled the words of the prophets that are read every Sabbath.
You would have to explain how this shows Christians gathered in the temple on the Sabbath. I'm not seeing this at all. Certainly the people of Jerusalem and their rulers weren't Christians.
13:44: On the next Sabbath almost the whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord. 45 When the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy. They began to contradict what Paul was saying and heaped abuse on him. Then Paul and Barnabas answered them boldly: “We had to speak the word of God to you first. Since you reject it and do not consider yourselves worthy of eternal life, we now turn to the Gentiles.
Once again, the apostle are witnessing to gentiles on the Sabbath. This is a witness, and the Jews show up to argue with them. This is not a gathering of Christian believers for Sabbath services.
This post is getting long. I suspect if I go through 15;21 and the others I'll find much the same. But you didn't take the time to post the actual verses, so I'll take a pass on doing the same.
In any event, I think we have conclusively shown that Christians were free to attend Sabbath, just as they are now, but were never under a compulsion to do so.
Good night everyone, and thank you for the conversation 3rdAngel. I am behind in my work and I have a lot to catch up with, so it may be awhile before I can get back to anyone.
Take care.
Oeste