• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The NATO

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
She is a lawyer too.


Many lawyers side with the people

Yeah, but the majority wants all of you imprisoned. You are nothing but lower than rats. You are not even human or worthy of life. ;) :D

Remember the majority is right and you are also a minority, if the majority turns against you. You are not the people. You as you are a minority like everybody else.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
Hey guys:)
...watch this video carefully.
Especially the last sentence.
We Americans will use Ukrainians proxies and we will fight to the last Ukrainian death.


He is a throwback to the Cold War Era, where both sides were paranoid and both sides considered preemptive war. However, both sides were kept in check, by the fear of total destruction by nuclear war; mutually assured destruction.

The compromise was spy-v-spy and over throwing small buffer countries, secretly, under the guise of forming defensive barriers against the other. This would lead to the order side provoking neighbors against these neighbors. to check the new evil in town. It was the glory days of all the intel organizations. It was also good for the munitions industries.

Mutually assured destruction, after President Reagan and President Bush Sr. broke the Soviet Union, ended and then would morph. Now the modern bogeyman is carbon. That pesky evil element, that everyone uses, is now the enemy of all, according to the intel people, Once again the ends can justify the means to appease the induced fear and paranoia. The same clowns like the idea of creating another adversarial relationship; carbon righteous versus the evil deniers. The McCarthy era is back.

The Russia and Ukraine war helped restore some common sense. That war s now hurting all sides of the carbon war, due to the fact that the carbon Cold War of the Left, was not ready to stand on its own, without carbon to prop it up.The NATO countries are going into winter with fuel shortages and not enough green energy to make any difference. The days of wind powered battle ships is in the past. War is changing the common sense priorities for all.

The green push will now be placed on notice, and an old Cold War buddy will become the substitute, with mutually assured destruction; nukes, keeping it things in check. The Carbon Cold War did not learn from mutually assured destruction; go slow, but destroyed itself by nuking first, before it was ready.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
You’d be surprised at the low quality of some of our Congress critters. Do you believe in Jewish space lasers?
One question.
If someone had showed up at the OJ Simpson's trial, saying: I have seen Simpson slay a woman and a man with a butcher knife.
Would the jury have considered this testimony not reliable / not credible?
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
One question.
If someone had showed up at the OJ Simpson's trial, saying: I have seen Simpson slay a woman and a man with a butcher knife.
Would the jury have considered this testimony not reliable / not credible?

Too vague.
So here is all of the world as you. All of history and all the different actors are irrelvant. You are in a house, where there happened a murder. That is all of the world and all of human history.
And since there were only 2 people present, you the people and the deep state, you are the murderer.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
One question.
If someone had showed up at the OJ Simpson's trial, saying: I have seen Simpson slay a woman and a man with a butcher knife.
Would the jury have considered this testimony not reliable / not credible?
My question is first.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
It's irrelevant because I consider him a reliable source because he's a NATO colonel. Not as a state senator.
So your point is not valid, I am sorry.;)

Yeah, you are the jury, lawyer and judge of us all in your own International Court. ;)
BTW Green is not a state senator.

And a single Nato officer is Nato. Well, your point is not valid, I am sorry. :D
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Democracy is supposed to be about hearing minorities and establishing communication. There isn't much of a point to it otherwise.
Of course. I do agree.
The weakest, the most humble are minorities and need to be protected.

I do hope the banking & financial élites do not consider themselves "minorities in need of protection"....
it would be the Prince John Syndrome.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
If you want to admit that you are strongly biased, then we will have to accept it.

I was brought up to reject doublestandardism.
I am not biased at all.
And in fact...I think Kosovo should be a sovereign state. But Donbas and Crimea as well.

The biased people are those who believe in double standards: that is, Kosovo deserves to be a sovereign state, but Crimea doesn't.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I was brought up to reject doublestandardism.
I am not biased at all.
And in fact...I think Kosovo should be a sovereign state. But Donbas and Crimea as well.

The biased people are those who believe in double standards: that is, Kosovo deserves to be a sovereign state, but Crimea doesn't.
Sorry, I just can't bring myself to agree with any of that. For at least two main reasons.

The first is that I refuse - emphatically - to validate your judgements, including towards yourself. They are not justified, simple as that.

The second is that I have come to accept that all state borders are ultimately arbitrary.

Word has it that Italy is no exception, come to think of it. Your unification was a troubled, difficult story, wasn't it?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Sorry, I just can't bring myself to agree with any of that. For at least two main reasons.

The first is that I refuse - emphatically - to validate your judgements, including towards yourself. They are not justified, simple as that.

The second is that I have come to accept that all state borders are ultimately arbitrary.

Word has it that Italy is no exception, come to think of it. Your unification was a troubled, difficult story, wasn't it?

It seems to me that Britain is an island. It has borders. My country is a peninsula, it has borders.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
I was brought up to reject doublestandardism.
I am not biased at all.
And in fact...I think Kosovo should be a sovereign state. But Donbas and Crimea as well.

The biased people are those who believe in double standards: that is, Kosovo deserves to be a sovereign state, but Crimea doesn't.

Yeah, you have opinions. We all have them.
I think that the over 100 nationalities in Russia should be independent. The same with Skåne and Jämtland.
 
Top