• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Random, Meaningless Announcements Thread 3!

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Someone we know?
giphy.gif

I told a friend about how I feel about the current state of RF software and he suggested what you see.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I need to see Steve Miller again before he calls it quits.
I was a big fan in the seventies, when I bought his Anthology. This was before his hits like Space Cowboy, Jet Airliner, and Fly Like An Eagle.

Have you heard Baby's House? The voice is as pure as any I've ever heard. And the story is powerful. It's about a young man and a woman, lonely, eventually finding one another, and how love blossoms leading to a child. Here's how making love and conception are described, followed by instrumental, and then a vocal crescendo, when the drums finally appear. The baby's house is her uterus, her purple house. Who writes songs like that today? :

Lying in her sitting room, silently
He touches her hand, joyfully
And so love has begun
With joy in her heart
She receives his flowing soul
And love grows
And it grows
And it grows

Inside her purple house
Oh Lord, filled by her man
A child begins to grow
Oh Lord, who can understand

 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
That is pretty much the only song I liked by them after 1991 until I heard one recently from what is supposed to be thier new album
I feel about the same. And Justice for All was their last good album. Black Album had a some good songs, but without Cliff Burton you can tell Metallica died and became Zombie Metallica. And then went profane and blasphemous with St. Anger.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
The interview helper lady I talked to today, she was very helpful. She works mostly with former inmates getting back in regular society, so was able to soin my being a stubborn *** into being a fierce advocate for my patients/clients.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) is being ridiculed online after unleashing an error-ridden tirade regarding urine during a hearing at the Capitol, about the nation's capital, on Wednesday.

Yet despite Boebert's insistence that he revised D.C.'s criminal code to allow for public peeing, Allen noted that the conservative politician's claims were actually false.

"No, those are not the law," Allen responded.

The hearing came in the wake of President Joe Biden's decision to sign a bill overturning the D.C. city council's reform efforts, which were criticized for being lax on crime by House Republicans.

After a back-and-forth in which she continued to stress the matter, Boebert again asked Allen whether he had removed any laws that criminalized certain activities, such as peeing in public.

Even with the explanation, Boebert pushed further.

"We have records that show that you were in favor of removing that criminal offense and allowing public urination," Boebert insisted.

"No," Allen said in response.

The display quickly made its way to social media, where users mocked Boebert's attempt to accuse the councilman of legalizing the expulsion of human pee in public spaces.

Some users on Twitter described the event as a "clown show" while others called the line of question nothing more than an "embarrassment."

Either way, it doesn't appear that Boebert was able to get to the bottom of her pee problem.

I can't think of any possible reason why this kind of exchange should even happen in the first place.
 
Top