Elessar
Well-Known Member
This was much later on, during and after the Council of Nicea by Roman emporer Constantine.
"Later on"? The 300s are pretty early on, I'd say.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This was much later on, during and after the Council of Nicea by Roman emporer Constantine.
Yet again you miss my point.
The crusades were a boost for the religion and made it wide spread because they were taking over countries and forcing the religion onto them.
I disagree.Because of this thing called the crusades where christians went around killing hundreds of thousands of people in the name of "god".
Agree or Disagree?
I disagree.
I think its popular because it preaches to the choir telling you what you want to hear, while also being a fear-based religion and the threat of eternal hellfire scares people into believing anything else.
: But, if you weren't Christian you would be missing something; wouldn't you?And what about those Christians who don't believe in hellfire? Not all of us do. Some of believe that what they call hell is either "the grave" or a state of mind. In other words, not all people are Christians because they are afraid not to be.
Yet again you miss my point.
The crusades were a boost for the religion and made it wide spread because they were taking over countries and forcing the religion onto them.
Define "early days" and "many"...Back in ther early days of Christianity it certainly was the literalists againsts the Gnotists, many despised the fact that the literalists were insisting that Jesus was a real person instead of a spiritual being.
That was never a question, no one, to my knowledge, has ever taught that the Roman Emperor had the authority to decide doctrine...do you accept the authority of the Roman Emperor... to decide doctrine for the Faith.
When I was a Christian, I actually did hear people mention the Crusades fairly often. But then, my church was on the receiving end of the Crusades, and people in the Balkans have long, long memories.Well, that's the reason many of us are Christians.
Every time I go to church, the preacher says, "Hey losers, remember in the Dark Ages when they had those dad-burned Crusades? That was fun!"
When I was a Christian, I actually did hear people mention the Crusades fairly often. But then, my church was on the receiving end of the Crusades, and people in the Balkans have long, long memories.
Define "early days" and "many"...
That was never a question, no one, to my knowledge, has ever taught that the Roman Emperor had the authority to decide doctrine...
Because of this thing called the crusades where christians went around killing hundreds of thousands of people in the name of "god".
Agree or Disagree?
There was both commercial and religious interests involved, it was an important trade centre and important City, and it was a Christian City.Crusades, military expeditions undertaken by Western European Christians beginning in 1095, usually at the request of the pope, to recover Jerusalem and the other places of pilgrimage in Palestine (now in Israel and Palestine) known to Christians as the Holy Land from Muslim control.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2006. © 1993-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
So we have that the Christians controlled this important City, that ended in 637 from that time to 969 the Christian population was not persecuted by their Muslim conquerors, then it was the Turks turn to rule and this is where the situation became untenable for Christians, they could not continue their business, the great trade that the pilgrims brought, but this was not a powerful enough reason for Western Europe to go to war and religion and it leaders were brought into the equation.Little is known of the city from the time of Hadrian until that of the Roman emperor Constantine the Great, when Christianity became the religion of the empire. The population of Jerusalem was gradually supplemented by Christians, and pilgrims flocked to the city. The Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built at the order of Constantine.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2006. © 1993-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
I disagree, I don't believe that anybody can force someone to believe, war of any type created resented people, not converted people, I think that it is the power of the Gospels of Jesus is what does it, its transforming power, the crusades were a war for the possession of a City, religion was used to encourage participation and severely damaged religions reputation it did not gain them any faithfuls on the contrary it created a formidable enemy, even to this days this is used to embarrass the Church. So No! The Crusades did not help one little bit, they were a hinder to it spreading
There was both commercial and religious interests involved, it was an important trade centre and important City, and it was a Christian City.
So we have that the Christians controlled this important City, that ended in 637 from that time to 969 the Christian population was not persecuted by their Muslim conquerors, then it was the Turks turn to rule and this is where the situation became untenable for Christians, they could not continue their business, the great trade that the pilgrims brought, but this was not a powerful enough reason for Western Europe to go to war and religion and it leaders were brought into the equation.
I disagree.
I think its popular because it preaches to the choir telling you what you want to hear, while also being a fear-based religion and the threat of eternal hellfire scares people into believing anything else.
The reason Christianity is "popular" is because people were born into and brought up in it.
This fails to explain why it got popular in the first place...The reason Christianity is "popular" is because people were born into and brought up in it.
I hate ambivalence, what is it, did they or didn’t they? If you do any of these thing you will never get a converted soul for your efforts, on the contrary you will have a dangerous enemy.Emiliano there is little doubt Christianity spread its religion through the sword, well attempted to.
Look at Encarta and you’ll see that they won only the first of them.It was believed (for a short time at least) that an army bearing the cross of christ could not be defeated. There is nothing to "believe" about the crusades. Simply look at the evidence there is.
Islam didn't exist, and I'm unsure of the popularity of Judaism, or that the Empire would choose a Judaic based religion, considering the rebellions and dissent from the area...primarily because Abrahamic religions such as Judaism and Islam were in popular practice.
I hate ambivalence, what is it, did they or didnt they? If you do any of these thing you will never get a converted soul for your efforts, on the contrary you will have a dangerous enemy.
So you are telling us that by cutting pieces of people, humiliating, starving them, one can convert people to Christianity? Are you OK? Killing them? Come on mate, you didnt think this one through, did you? Killing their family members?
Look at Encarta and youll see that they won only the first of them.
Religious interests can be discounted as the Muslims allowed Christians to worship in the city. The Christians took the city and begun to tax the muslims, hardly fair. It was a city of multiple faiths, not just a christian city.
Here we go again, they began to tax people because they were in control, they conquered the City, that was their political aim, to collect taxes, to own the City, and by the way as soon as they gain control of the City t became a one faith City. Do you take this as everybody became Christian?