• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Resurrection of Jesus Christ

leov

Well-Known Member
That above is about the resurrection of the dead.

Paul on the Resurrection of Jesus Christ: "Paul starts out in 1 Corinthians 15 by reminding them that Jesus did die and was raised from the dead for the salvation of man. This is the foundation of the gospel. Next Paul states that there were witnesses of the resurrection of Jesus, not only by His disciples but by more than 500 people. Paul wrote 1 Corinthians approximately 20 years after Jesus' death and resurrection. It would be very hard to argue or dispute that many credible witnesses." What Does Paul Say About the Resurrection of Jesus
" 40but God raised him on the third day and made him to appear, 41not to all the people but to us who had been chosen by God as witnesses, who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead. ."
 

Luciferi Baphomet

Lucifer, is my Liberator
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!
I am confused. Aren't you a christian? I thought christians believed that jesus came back. Oh well lol.
 

Regiomontanus

Eastern Orthodox
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!


"For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."

1 Cor 1:18
 

Nimos

Well-Known Member
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!
Well as others have pointed out as well, you are shifting the burden of proof :)

Nonetheless I will give it a try.

Proof:
Never in recorded history have anyone been resurrected from the dead after 3 days. So the lack of evidence for such things occurring is evidence for it not being possible.

Clinical death:
Most tissues and organs of the body can survive clinical death for considerable periods. Blood circulation can be stopped in the entire body below the heart for at least 30 minutes, with injury to the spinal cord being a limiting factor. Detached limbs may be successfully reattached after 6 hours of no blood circulation at warm temperatures. Bone, tendon, and skin can survive as long as 8 to 12 hours.

The brain, however, appears to accumulate ischemic injury faster than any other organ. Without special treatment after circulation is restarted, full recovery of the brain after more than 3 minutes of clinical death at normal body temperature is rare. Usually brain damage or later brain death results after longer intervals of clinical death even if the heart is restarted and blood circulation is successfully restored. Brain injury is therefore the chief limiting factor for recovery from clinical death.

Although loss of function is almost immediate, there is no specific duration of clinical death at which the non-functioning brain clearly dies. The most vulnerable cells in the brain, CA1 neurons of the hippocampus, are fatally injured by as little as 10 minutes without oxygen. However, the injured cells do not actually die until hours after resuscitation.This delayed death can be prevented in vitro by a simple drug treatment even after 20 minutes without oxygen. In other areas of the brain, viable human neurons have been recovered and grown in culture hours after clinical death. Brain failure after clinical death is now known to be due to a complex series of processes called reperfusion injury that occur after blood circulation has been restored, especially processes that interfere with blood circulation during the recovery period. Control of these processes is the subject of ongoing research.

Velma Thomas, 59, of West Virginia, USA holds the record time for recovering from clinical death. In May 2008, Thomas went into cardiac arrest at her home. Medics were able to establish a faint pulse after eight minutes of CPR. Her heart stopped twice after arriving at the hospital and she was placed on life support. Doctors attempted to lower her body temperature to prevent additional brain injury. She was declared clinically dead for 17 hours after doctors failed to detect brain activity. Her son, Tim Thomas, stated that "her skin had already started hardening, her hands and toes were curling up, they were already drawn". She was taken off life support and funeral arrangements were in progress. However, ten minutes after being taken off life support, she revived and recovered.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_death


Now Jesus does not appear to hold the official record and would have beaten her by a lot, and this was when she was placed in life support. Also Lazarus would have beaten Jesus by a day, but he didn't take the record either :(
 

Jos

Well-Known Member
"For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."

1 Cor 1:18
All God had to do was just not create the perishing or any human whatsoever. Therefore no evil and no hell. It's not like He needed humans and before He created anything, He already had everything He could ever need or want, so all of this was completely unnecessary.
 

Regiomontanus

Eastern Orthodox
All God had to do was just not create the perishing or any human whatsoever. Therefore no evil and no hell. It's not like He needed humans and before He created anything, He already had everything He could ever need or want, so all of this was completely unnecessary.


Interesting interpretation of Christianity. Not one I recognize, but that is OK.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
What myth? Where's your evidence the resurrection is a myth?

And if you don't like the extra-biblical sources I listed then tough.
Those were not "extra-biblical" sources. It appears that you do not appear to understand the meaning of the phrase. And you are once again shifting the burden of proof. Wild tales that have no reliable evidence are taken to be myth. The burden of proof is upon those making the positive claim.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yeah it is needed. You don't a free pass to run your flea-bitten dogs around the arena without some evidence to back them up.

Wrong again, all I need to do is to show similar claims that are deemed to be myths. Do you not know what a myth is? It is a wild tale that is not supported by reliable evidence. By that standard the resurrection is a myth.

That's your spin. The preponderance of the evidence is the normal standard. And the weight of the evidence FOR the resurrection far outweighs the nothing you've provided so far.

Even by that standard it fails since none of the supposed evidence is very reliable. All that you have is hear-say at best.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!
The crux of Christianity? A sort of cross of the cross, or meta-cross or what?

Even if I could show that the resurrection violates the laws of nature, that would be useless anyway, given that it was an alleged miracle, and therefore by definition a violation the laws of nature.

And it would as pointless as defeating Pinocchio, or that Mohammed flew to heaven on a winged horse, or anything that I could make up today.

My main critique is that if the resurrection really took place, that was pretty lame of Jesus.

Ciao

- viole
 
Last edited:

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!
As stated by others, there’s no evidence the resurrection as recorded in the Gospels actually happened other than viewing a theological narrative as historical. The resurrection and especially the ascension involving Jesus ascend through the stratosphere into outer space doesn’t make much sense, unless the heaven we go to when we die is the same ‘heaven’ as in outer space.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member

Because I thought my sins would require more than a weekend off to be washed out. I don’t know, at least a few years of staying dead maybe. Oh well, probably they were not so important, after all.

Ciao

- viole
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!

People don't rise from the dead. For such an extraordinary claim of such a thing the burden is on you to prove it.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The physical resurrection of Jesus is clearly seen in the Gospels and Acts.

This is actually a possible argument for the proper biblical interpretation of the resurrection. But to expect others to give it any credibility based on the weak evidence for it is an error on your part. You failed to show that there is any more evidence for that event than there is for Mohammad's trip to the Moon. If you believe one but not the other you are not being consistent in your reasoning.
 

steveb1

Member
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ is the crux of Christianity. If Christ is not risen from the dead, Christianity dies an immediate death.

Countless times skeptics of Christianity in these fora have been challenged to 'bust' (falsify) the resurrection as it is presented in the New Testament, etc. Every time they've been challenged they run from it, or come up with some shallow argument which they never fully defend. Or they run to Genesis for cover. At no time that I can recall has anyone ever busted the resurrection, although the skeptics love to present wall-to-wall THEORIES on what might have otherwise occurred. They LOVE their theories and unfounded claims. But so far they have no credible evidence to substantiate those theories.

If anyone presents an argument that a (the) resurrection violates the laws of nature / physics, then they must present replicated and peer-approved scientific studies demonstrating that God and the supernatural do not and cannot exist.

This thread is about the resurrection of Christ as seen in the Bible / Gospels / New Testament and early extra-biblical writings. Skeptics are invited to try to falsify it, using scriptural and/or historical arguments, etc. And if they can't bust the resurrection, they should strongly reconsider their contrary opinions on the matter.

Skeptics, let's see your bad-boy arguments, and do please endeavor to come up with some EVIDENCE to back up your arguments, and not just pontificate one theory after another!

The resurrection was "bodily" but not physical. Jesus's resurrection or spiritual body does things that no physical body could ever do. The risen Christ can pass through solid objects, appear and disappear at will, and ascend to heaven inside a cloud. Which means that his risen body was not composed of matter as we know it.

No physical resurrection ever happened. As Paul says, "the Lord is a spirit", and again that Jesus is a "vivifying" or "life-sparking" spirit. When the risen Jesus appeared to Paul, Paul did not report seeing a physical body with human features, but only a light and a voice.

The NT supplies one of the strongest arguments against a physical resurrection, namely, the empty tomb with its stone rolled away. If Jesus's resurrection body could really pass through solid obstacles, there is no need whatsoever for the stone to have been rolled away. That it is reported to have been rolled away indicates that an all-too-human agency was thought to have moved it. Jesus supposedly could have simply walked through the stone barrier. So there was no need for Jesus, God, angels, secret disciples or funeral directors to move the stone.

Thus the supposedly highly evidential rolled away stone strongly argues against the idea of a physical resurrection.
 
Top