Believing to be true isn't the same as actually being true. I've seen no evidence of your version of religion to be true for me. Only logical fallacies, one after the other, and displaying inability to read/listen to others. :ignore:
I agree and that was kind of my point. As to evidence.
1. The bible contains 25,000 historical corroborations.
2. It contains no known historical error outside of less than 5% scribal error and those are all known.
3. It has been said by histories greatest experts in testimony and evidence (Greenleaf and Lyndhurst) to pass every test modern law can throw at it.
4. It contains 2000 prophecies that have came to pass in every detail including 350 about one person.
That is only a tiny fraction of the evidence that was so convincing it converted empires, many of histories greatest scholars in every subject, and billions of people who began life resistant to it. I can't get a lack of evidence from that.
I find it quite arrogant to think that way. When it comes to religion/spirituality, we all have our own version of it and our own experience. Hence why my truth isn't yours.
Every true Christian on earth has actual experiential proof of Christ's existence. What is arrogant about telling others of that proof or the mountains of evidence for God? Do not assume because you have uncertainty everyone does.
And personally, I find it a lot more "self destructive" to not ever consider the fact that you could be wrong and "train wreaks" to consider things like bigotry and murder to be justifiable under their religion.
No group of people on Earth in my experience are as critical as Christians. We constantly second guess even or experiences with God. The fact we always arrive at the same conclusion is proof of the quality of the evidence. The most critical of scientific, philosophic, and historical geniuses in history have been men of faith. It is the height of arrogance to conclude everyone I have mentioned is self delusional.
