look try to understand me , it you have for exmeple an accidentRegardless of mixing up the names though it's true that proving an eclipse happened proves nothing more than that an eclipse happened -- it doesn't prove that anybody existed.
Agreed?
(event in the past , that accident corspend an eclipse of sun for a
specific day ,(registered ) , and you have a software caculate the
eclipses of sun during the time , our curois push us to make sure
if there is an eclipse of sun in that day (specific day) ,
that what i do i find these softwares and make sure by my self
and in the end i discover that there was an eclipse of sun at that accident , that mean the history of Islam based on the truth , and that mean that Ibrahim and Prophat Muhammad (pbuh) were existed .
-look i did not Invented these softwares , and i did not created the date of the accident (the date registed in the Islam History) ....
the accident (of death corespond the eclipse of sun) happened in the past , and software created recently,
the eclipse of the sun that happened in the past confirmed by these softwares ...do you understand me !!!!!