That's totally fine, I respect all perspectives to join in, and am very thankful for each person who participates in my threads.
That's kind of you. I appreciate that.
By God's way I mean what we can tell of it by how reality is.
What specifically do you mean by reality? Our day to day reality? Or reality vs. the unreal?
I've never seen an example of the adversary enslaving anyone. And I can't think of how he can presently if he's been defeated, or even how God allows him to.
Well, I have - addiction being the primary example of enslavement. I've had several family members succumb to their addictions and die.
The adversary tempts. In my faith, the adversary tempts and sugar coats. Demonic influence is of the adversary. This is a core piece of my faith. I don't expect anyone else to agree.
Jesus and God seem two unique characters, I don't see much that they agree on. But honestly, if God actually wanted us to overcome hell, if he really cared about us getting into heaven, hell wouldn't exist in the first place.
I'm a Trinitarian. I believe that God the Father and God the Son are two unique facets of one God. God as Jesus and God as Father have different purposes. Jesus' purpose was to teach us how to live for and commune with God as Father - establishing the parent/child relationship.
Hell doesn't negate that God loved us enough to come to us in the flesh and to implement a plahn for our salvation. I don't believe that it was God's idea for his own angelic creations to rebel against Him and defile the hearts and minds of man.
Hell, in my opinion, was designed to be the punishment for Satan, his brethren (the fallen) and the demonic forces that were brought into the world as a result of
their sin and subsequent influence upon man to sin and turn from God.
He could've gotten the goal of the Great Flood done in a more humane manner.
The bible says that all had become wicked during the time of Noah. Fallen Sons of God were procreating with people - a defilement.
He could've taught those kids some manners instead of making them food for bears for calling a prophet "baldy," or even implanted manners into them (sure, it'd take away some of their freewill, but even the bear scenario took away some of their freewill, so I don't think that's a huge issue here)
The scouts who visited the promised lands in Numbers
Abiram and Korah along with some children for claiming to be as holy as Moses in Numbers 16 27
Uzzah who touched the ark to prevent it from falling apart or something like that.
King Ahazia who turned to Ba'al for health reasons rather than turning to Yahweh
Are these not examples of disobedience? In this time, per the bible, God showed Himself to His people in amazing ways that we haven't seen in our time and yet they still disobeyed.
The majority of people, even those who dismiss God altogether accept that there's consequence for action.
But why give us overwhelming desires to sin in the first place?
He didn't give any of this. This became par for the course after Eve sinned. What's important is that He provided the means to overcome through Him.
Why can't it be? Certainly it could be if God wanted it to be.
Suffering is par for the course because of sin. You can question God's motives all you want. I hope you find the answers that you're seeking.
Why does one have to believe to have everlasting life? Why does one need faith to rejoice? Why does one need to rejoice?
Why would you rejoice in God if you didn't believe in Him?
But there needn't be struggles. These struggles are, if not created by God, allowed by God. Why does God think he deserves to be trusted after giving us struggles? If anything, I wouldn't trust God even if I could, because he wouldn't deserve it after such brutal struggles.
It's as if you negate that which can be done through God, through love, healing, kindness. Are you dismissing that which God allows us to do for his kingdom?
We can drown in sorrow and struggles or we can rise above and be a testimony and light in this world. It's our choice. It's greatly about perspective.
It's my choice to follow him, but not my choice to follow him without negative consequences. Again, the mafia scenario.
No one can change the fact that the they'll be thrown curve balls in life.
"You have the OPTION of following me, and the option of not following me. But you will go to hell if you choose the second option"
Compared to
"You have the OPTION of giving me your money, and the option of not giving me your money. But you will get shot if you choose the second option"
So? If you knowingly break the law, do you have the ability to dictate your penalty?
It's not a choice to have urges and temptations, that was encoded in us since the dawn of man. If we were truly made perfect originally, we would never have chose sin in the first place. We've always been corrupt, God's making an excuse, making us believe it's our fault.
Man wasn't designed to sin. Adam and Even were made God-like. We were corrupted by our disobedience and our belief in an arrogant, liar who can't have what we have.
God's been straight forward since the beginning because He is truth.
The "devil made me do it" just doesn't fly. We've always had the ability to make the right choice.
It's in our nature, and God made our nature, thus God made us wrathful.
I disagree.
How isn't he? Sure, you don't HAVE to follow him, you're fully able to not follow him, but if you go in that path you're living with burdens and are going to hell. It's not much of a choice if he is going to hurt us for choosing something he doesn't want.
I don't understand the concept of fearing hell or resenting God for hell. Why waste your energy contemplating hell. If one doesn't believe in God, why bother believing in hell? Doesn't make sense to me.