• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Supreme Court will decide if Donald Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots

Laniakea

Not of this world
Only if Biden caused an insurrection too. (He hasn't)

Remember, the court rules based on evidence, not politics. Trump has caused an insurrection, Biden never has.

That isn't mentioned in the 14th amendment.

The law would, which you know nothing about as revealed thus far.

Cite it.
Wow, you really aren't following along.....
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Low ratings aren't the goal.
They just are a fact of life
for Libertarian candidates.
Then maybe it's time for libertarians to realize that they are not on track to win any elections. Time to get on board with a winner. The republican candidate or 2024 is a sure bet!
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Then maybe it's time for libertarians to realize that they are not on track to win any elections. Time to get on board with a winner. The republican candidate or 2024 is a sure bet!
I expect us to lose again.
But Trump is far from a sure thing.
His civil & criminal legal woes are costing
him votes, especially among women.
And his mental decline looks as shaky
as Biden's.
There is much potential for apple carts
to be upset in this race.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
EV's are being mandated as the only choice for a vehicle, even though they're far less capable. Maybe you can afford to sit at home in front of a screen all day, but some people are dependent on reliable transportation, and don't want their option to have it be eliminated within the next 11 years. These 9 States Banned the Sale of Gas-Powered Cars: Is Yours One of Them?
What makes you think that they are "less capable"? And do you know why we have to ban ICE's eventually?
 

Laniakea

Not of this world

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
If SCOTUS were to stand with CO on this one, then yes, TX could remove biden for whatever reason someone there wants to remove him for. Allowing illegals to invade through Texas and actively working against Texas to secure the border would be their reason. If SCOTUS were to side with CO, then nothing would stop TX from removing biden. There would be a legal precedent allowing for it.
I see that you either did not read or did not understand the 14th Amendment. That is par for the course with you. One has to be demonstrably guilty of insurrection to be disqualified by that amendment. Nothing that Biden has been even falsely accused of comes close to insurrection.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
I see that you either did not read or did not understand the 14th Amendment. That is par for the course with you. One has to be demonstrably guilty of insurrection to be disqualified by that amendment. Nothing that Biden has been even falsely accused of comes close to insurrection.
Ever hear of the 25th Amendment? Fake insurrection charges aren't everything.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member

Gas or electric? Better go with gas.
That is a minor inconvenience. Right now, since electric is new it should be homeowners that are buying them. It will take a few years to have adequate charge points for apartment dwellers. If one owns a home one merely plugs it in every night. When one does that the savings are huge since charge points have to not only charge for the electricity, but for the service as well. It is far cheaper to plug in at night. The average range on an EV is now over 300 miles. Okay, in old weather that is 240 miles. Not very many people drive 120 miles twice each day. Those folks would probably be better off sticking with gas for a while. But right now for homeowners electric is already far more capable.

Tell me, how long after the gasoline powered car was introduced did it take for a person to easily make a coast to coast trip? How hard was it to fill up originally? It took years and years for that infrastructure to be built just as it will take a few more years to get enough charge points built.

You do not seem to understand that no one is taking away gas cars. But sooner or later you won't be able to buy them And you have to know why we must change. There are actually two reasons. You should at the very least know one of them.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
An arrest is only the first step in a criminal procedure. Some areas may only file an indictment but it appears that Trump has been formerly arrested at least three times. In two of those cases he was processed at the courthouse, but in Georgia he had to go to the Fulton county jail for fingerprinting and a mugshot:


I believe that he has also been formerly arrested, but only appeared in the courthouse for the New York Stormy Daniels case and the DC case. He has four separate criminal charges that he is facing right now. The rape charge was civil because the statute of limitations had run out on criminal charges for that act.

The New York state business fraud suit, which is likely to ruin his empire was held late last year. Both sides asked for an early verdict before the trial even began. The judge had access to all of the undisputed evidence that both sides agreed to and on that alone he saw that there was enough evidence to convict Trump. The trial was about how much money would be taken back from him as a result. The prosecutor still presented all of his evidence since he wanted it on record. He was fairly sure that there is a good chance that Trump would try to appeal the case. That trial was a bench trial. Meaning that it was decided by only the judge. It appears that is what both sides wanted. Either side could have requested a jury trial if they wanted one. You may hear Trump complaining about not having a jury trial, but that is just another one of his many lies. Up to a reasonable date before the trial starts his lawyers could have requested a jury. They never did that. So they are either incredibly incompetent, and after watching Haga that is a clear possibility, or Trump did not want the additional publicity and the fact that all of the evidence would have been presented out in the open for everyone to hear about. As it was only those following this story closely seem to be aware of the ins and outs of the trial.
As you can see, nothing from your post shows who arrested him, where he was taken and charged, and where he was convicted of either attempted Insurrection or the complete crime.

I really do wonder how the US and whole world will respond to such a leader, should he win, today's news gives clews about all that, .....I give a link below.

But I am just looking at how 9 Supreme Court Judges might find regardless of their political views. It's all very worrying ...... absolutely!
But it's not up to any but the Supreme Court to decide.

I really do hope that you are right............. but alas........


Donald Trump says he would encourage Russia to attack ...​

1707638534840.png
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › feb › donal...




4 hours ago — Remarks by former president and presumptive 2024 Republican nominee described as 'unhinged' by the White House.

Missing: let ‎| Show results with: let
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
As you can see, nothing from your post shows who arrested him, where he was taken and charged, and where he was convicted of either attempted Insurrection or the complete crime.
Trump was arrested and arraigned four times in different jurisdictions. Which one are you asking about? All four were covered by the media.
I really do wonder how the US and whole world will respond to such a leader, should he win, today's news gives clews about all that, .....I give a link below.
You’re asking how the world will respond to a corrupt president who has explained how he will use his authority irresponsibly and vindictively. The answer is that our allies will be very cautious and not willing to risk their own security by trusting Trump’s government. It is likely Trump will align with adversaries to the USA and other NATO nations.
 
Top