Laniakea
Not of this world
Is that when the classified information finally makes it's way out of the biden garage?Correct. Classified information is usually kept secret as long as possible because it helps the US.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is that when the classified information finally makes it's way out of the biden garage?Correct. Classified information is usually kept secret as long as possible because it helps the US.
Only when they.find it by his corvette lolIs that when the classified information finally makes it's way out of the biden garage?
But it's ok. He's just a sympathetic old man with a bad memory. A democrat kind of guy!Only when they.find it by his corvette lol
Yes, but you often make the same errors that she makes."You clearly did not read it"
I vote yes lol
"or did not understand it"
Again I vote yes lol
I see that your TDS is kicking up again. Remember how I said that article did not support you? According to it the Chinese got no intelligence:But it's ok. He's just a sympathetic old man with a bad memory. A democrat kind of guy!
What did he have, one small document that was mostly a private conversation between him and Obama. Meanwhile Trump had all sorts of high level classified material. Again, classic TDS where you try to compare one to another.Is that when the classified information finally makes it's way out of the biden garage?
Oh honey, you accuse me of having TDS right after you brought Trump into the discussion.What did he have, one small document that was mostly a private conversation between him and Obama. Meanwhile Trump had all sorts of high level classified material. Again, classic TDS where you try to compare one to another.
You are the one that is irrationally defending him. What determines TDS is if one is irrational or not.Oh honey, you accuse me of having TDS right after you brought Trump into the discussion.
Mirror, mirror.
You fail to prove irrationality.You are the one that is irrationally defending him. What determines TDS is if one is irrational or not.
I know, that is why I am ready to bring up specific examples. Lately you accused me of making a "strawman argument". When I demanded to know what it was you ran away and would never do what a rational person would do. That is to explain the supposed strawman argument. That was a prime example of irrationality. So was your claim that the Chinese got what they wanted and to 'prove' that you posted a link. Sadly the link that you posted denied what you claimed. That is unless the only purpose of the balloon was to know where it was and when since that was the only information sent back according to your link. You were challenged on that and you pretended that you read it and understood it. Funny thing though, after I quoted from it to you I heard nothing. Both of those are examples of irrational thinking on your part.You fail to prove irrationality.
Hint: Your personal opinions prove nothing.
I don't usually answer questions when they aren't coming from a polite oscillating calculator.I know, that is why I am ready to bring up specific examples. Lately you accused me of making a "strawman argument". When I demanded to know what it was you ran away and would never do what a rational person would do. That is to explain the supposed strawman argument. That was a prime example of irrationality. So was your claim that the Chinese got what they wanted and to 'prove' that you posted a link. Sadly the link that you posted denied what you claimed. That is unless the only purpose of the balloon was to know where it was and when since that was the only information sent back according to your link. You were challenged on that and you pretended that you read it and understood it. Funny thing though, after I quoted from it to you I heard nothing. Both of those are examples of irrational thinking on your part.
Why am I not surprised. Another obvious falsehood and running away.I don't usually answer questions when they aren't coming from a polite oscillating calculator.
It made it's way out of there as soon as it was found.Is that when the classified information finally makes it's way out of the biden garage?
I agree about Trump but..While Biden did cooperate, the reason he wasn't charged is because it would be difficult to convict a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".(something like that)It made it's way out of there as soon as it was found.
Unlike in the case of Trump. Hence the reason Trump is being charged and Biden isn't.
In other words, no criminal intent was found. Unlike in the case of Trump.I agree about Trump but..While Biden did cooperate, the reason he wasn't charged is because it would be difficult to convict a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".(something like that)
Are you now claiming that you have the right to demand answers even though you're not being a polite interlocking gator?Why am I not surprised. Another obvious falsehood and running away.
You mean the raid on Mar-a-logo didn't result in the documents being removed from there?It made it's way out of there as soon as it was found.
Unlike in the case of Trump. Hence the reason Trump is being charged and Biden isn't.
Nope. In other words, it's difficult to try a man with dementia and have such a person convicted by a jury since they'd just feel sorry for him.In other words, no criminal intent was found. Unlike in the case of Trump.
Please note the difference. When Biden discovered that he had documents the authorities were notified he cooperated with authorities and they were returned. When a few further ones were found he cooperatedd again. In Trump's case so many documents were taken illegally that they could not help but to notice that many documents were missing. They demanded to have them returned. he illegally took about 11,000 documents. He refused to return them. Authorities had to get a court order. And then they recovered the documents. But it did not end there. He still had around 300 top secret, high level documents that he did not turn over. He had those in hiding. That was why they had to do the raid, Trump made it necessary. On the raid they got the remaining 300 documents. We hope:You mean the raid on Mar-a-logo didn't result in the documents being removed from there?
But Trump supposedly has been showing signs of dementia. So where's the assumption that he's just a forgetful old man?Please note the difference. When Biden discovered that he had documents the authorities were notified he cooperated with authorities and they were returned. When a few further ones were found he cooperatedd again. In Trump's case so many documents were taken illegally that they could not help but to notice that many documents were missing. They demanded to have them returned. he illegally took about 11,000 documents. He refused to return them. Authorities had to get a court order. And then they recovered the documents. But it did not end there. He still had around 300 top secret, high level documents that he did not turn over. He had those in hiding. That was why they had to do the raid, Trump made it necessary. On the raid they got the remaining 300 documents. We hope:
How does the Biden classified documents report compare to Trump's? A visual guide
Biden won't be prosecuted for classified documents, Justice Department probe concludes. But the report says the president has memory problems.www.usatoday.com
The cases are not anywhere close to each other. They had to force Trump to return his documents and even then he hid about 300. Trump force a secret raid.