• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Supreme Court will decide if Donald Trump can be kept off 2024 presidential ballots

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
But it's ok. He's just a sympathetic old man with a bad memory. A democrat kind of guy!
I see that your TDS is kicking up again. Remember how I said that article did not support you? According to it the Chinese got no intelligence:

"The network connection was not used to transmit intelligence back to China, according to the official. The balloon stored that information for later, including imagery and other data, which the US has since been able to study after shooting it down in February."

The balloon only managed to send back its location. Without any other information that is rather worthless.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Is that when the classified information finally makes it's way out of the biden garage?
What did he have, one small document that was mostly a private conversation between him and Obama. Meanwhile Trump had all sorts of high level classified material. Again, classic TDS where you try to compare one to another.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
What did he have, one small document that was mostly a private conversation between him and Obama. Meanwhile Trump had all sorts of high level classified material. Again, classic TDS where you try to compare one to another.
Oh honey, you accuse me of having TDS right after you brought Trump into the discussion.
Mirror, mirror.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You fail to prove irrationality.
Hint: Your personal opinions prove nothing.
I know, that is why I am ready to bring up specific examples. Lately you accused me of making a "strawman argument". When I demanded to know what it was you ran away and would never do what a rational person would do. That is to explain the supposed strawman argument. That was a prime example of irrationality. So was your claim that the Chinese got what they wanted and to 'prove' that you posted a link. Sadly the link that you posted denied what you claimed. That is unless the only purpose of the balloon was to know where it was and when since that was the only information sent back according to your link. You were challenged on that and you pretended that you read it and understood it. Funny thing though, after I quoted from it to you I heard nothing. Both of those are examples of irrational thinking on your part.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
I know, that is why I am ready to bring up specific examples. Lately you accused me of making a "strawman argument". When I demanded to know what it was you ran away and would never do what a rational person would do. That is to explain the supposed strawman argument. That was a prime example of irrationality. So was your claim that the Chinese got what they wanted and to 'prove' that you posted a link. Sadly the link that you posted denied what you claimed. That is unless the only purpose of the balloon was to know where it was and when since that was the only information sent back according to your link. You were challenged on that and you pretended that you read it and understood it. Funny thing though, after I quoted from it to you I heard nothing. Both of those are examples of irrational thinking on your part.
I don't usually answer questions when they aren't coming from a polite oscillating calculator.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
It made it's way out of there as soon as it was found.

Unlike in the case of Trump. Hence the reason Trump is being charged and Biden isn't.
I agree about Trump but..While Biden did cooperate, the reason he wasn't charged is because it would be difficult to convict a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".(something like that)
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
In other words, no criminal intent was found. Unlike in the case of Trump.
Nope. In other words, it's difficult to try a man with dementia and have such a person convicted by a jury since they'd just feel sorry for him.
But they don't mind him being president of the USA since he's got a "D" in front of his name.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You mean the raid on Mar-a-logo didn't result in the documents being removed from there?
Please note the difference. When Biden discovered that he had documents the authorities were notified he cooperated with authorities and they were returned. When a few further ones were found he cooperatedd again. In Trump's case so many documents were taken illegally that they could not help but to notice that many documents were missing. They demanded to have them returned. he illegally took about 11,000 documents. He refused to return them. Authorities had to get a court order. And then they recovered the documents. But it did not end there. He still had around 300 top secret, high level documents that he did not turn over. He had those in hiding. That was why they had to do the raid, Trump made it necessary. On the raid they got the remaining 300 documents. We hope:


The cases are not anywhere close to each other. They had to force Trump to return his documents and even then he hid about 300. Trump force a secret raid.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Please note the difference. When Biden discovered that he had documents the authorities were notified he cooperated with authorities and they were returned. When a few further ones were found he cooperatedd again. In Trump's case so many documents were taken illegally that they could not help but to notice that many documents were missing. They demanded to have them returned. he illegally took about 11,000 documents. He refused to return them. Authorities had to get a court order. And then they recovered the documents. But it did not end there. He still had around 300 top secret, high level documents that he did not turn over. He had those in hiding. That was why they had to do the raid, Trump made it necessary. On the raid they got the remaining 300 documents. We hope:


The cases are not anywhere close to each other. They had to force Trump to return his documents and even then he hid about 300. Trump force a secret raid.
But Trump supposedly has been showing signs of dementia. So where's the assumption that he's just a forgetful old man?
 
Top