This is your evidence? What people "think" 2000 years later omitting:
B. External Evidence:
1 The early Church regarded the letter as Petrine
1. Clear parallels exist in Clement of Rome’s Epistle to the Corinthians
2. Traces of the epistle may be in Ignatius, Barnabas and Hermas
3. Polycarp (c 70-150/166) has definite citations form the epistle
4. Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Clement of Alexandria all quote this epistle as Petrine
5. Theophilus of Antioch cites this letter as Petrine
6. Eusebius of Caesarea (c. 265-339) places it among the books that were accepted by the church without any doubt (homologoumena) and says that Papias (c. 60-130) used witnesses from 1 Peter
3
7. The author of the Letter of the Churches of Vienne and Lugdunum (Lyons) cites this letter as Petrine
No... I think I will stick to those closest to the event.
ROFL - No, you are basing that on suppositions.