• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The testimony of the NT writers

lukethethird

unknown member
As an Apostle?

Vs 1:3 - resurrection
the rest you can look at the Gospels.
The Epistle is filled with revelation IMO
Why look to the gospels? The unknown author of 1Peter predates the gospels and has no knowledge of a Christ that has already been to earth. This Peter's Christ has been revealed to him from on high and he claims that soon this Christ will be revealed to all. Yes, the Epistle is filled with revelation.
 

Eli G

Well-Known Member
I am sorry. Atheist leaders? You are kidding right?
I sense you atheists here are like a sect.

You act the same in every religious forum I have visited. It looks like you are somehow organized in your militance; you are so passionate sometimes,like sectarians, and when people is not waiting, suddenly ten of you appear like the zombies in the movies, hehehe, like if the sound atracted more of you.

Why are you so desperate to attack religious people? :rolleyes:
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I sense you atheists here are like a sect.

You act the same in every religious forum I have visited. It looks like you are somehow organized in your militance; you even are so passionate sometimes, and you when people is not waiting, suddenly ten of you appear like the zombies in the movies, hehehe, like the sound atracted you.

Why are you so desperate to attack religious people? :rolleyes:
Where have you been "attacked"? You have only been corrected. No one has called you names. No one has insulted your intelligence. All that is requested is that you properly support what you say that you believe.

Is that an attack?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
No. Kenny, if you post a claim you need a reliable source. We did this once before. I will not do it again unless you find actual scholars that support you and you provide links for your claims. As it is all I have to say is "I don't believe you".
dodge.

You said the church had an agenda with no citing or evidence and then you tell me I give no citation? hehehehahahahaHAHAHA! :D

3 Ecclesiastical History 3.25.2.
4 Guthrie writes, “Although it may not have been used as freely in the West as in the East, there is no evidence that it was ever disputed (NTI, 773). Blum affirms that 1 Peter is reflected in the Gospel of Truth which seems to use the books regarded as authoritative in Rome (c. AD 140) (“1 Peter,” EBC, 12:215).
5 The strong internal evidence led to the universal acceptance of this letter as from Peter until recent years (Edwin Blum, “1 Peter,” in EBC, 12:210).
6 Guthrie, NTI, 775.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Why look to the gospels? The unknown author of 1Peter predates the gospels and has no knowledge of a Christ that has already been to earth. This Peter's Christ has been revealed to him from on high and he claims that soon this Christ will be revealed to all. Yes, the Epistle is filled with revelation.
reliable citations please.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
And Christians tend to repeat their errors. So the corrections are repeated. Do you want to discuss why various Christians decided to become great defenders of the faith by becoming scholars and showing how Christianity was true, and then found out that it wasn't?

Have you heard of Bart Ehrman? He was a Bible literalist when he went to school. When he buckled down and really studied the Bible. He leaned the language it was written in . He studied the oldest writings. Do you know what happened to him as a result. He first quit being a literalist and then eventually quit being a Christian. There is a reason that JW's do not like education outside of the sect. They have no more control over what followers read.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
dodge.

You said the church had an agenda with no citing or evidence and then you tell me I give no citation? hehehehahahahaHAHAHA! :D

3 Ecclesiastical History 3.25.2.
4 Guthrie writes, “Although it may not have been used as freely in the West as in the East, there is no evidence that it was ever disputed (NTI, 773). Blum affirms that 1 Peter is reflected in the Gospel of Truth which seems to use the books regarded as authoritative in Rome (c. AD 140) (“1 Peter,” EBC, 12:215).
5 The strong internal evidence led to the universal acceptance of this letter as from Peter until recent years (Edwin Blum, “1 Peter,” in EBC, 12:210).
6 Guthrie, NTI, 775.
I asked for links for valid sources. You only gave claims. There is no excuse not to. We went through this once before and I ended up digging up your claims myself and refuting them. I am not doing your homework again.

Your clams, your burden of proof. Merely saying "There is a book that says . . . " is not good enough. Demanding that you properly support your claims is not a dodge.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
reliable citations please.




"1 Peter contains no evidence at all of familiarity with the earthly Jesus, his life, his teaching, and his death, but makes reference only in a general way to the 'sufferings' of Christ. It is scarcely conceivable that Peter would neither have sought to strengthen his authority by referring to his personal connections with Jesus nor have referred to the example of Jesus in some way." (W. G. Kümmel, Introduction to the New Testament, p. 424)
 

Eli G

Well-Known Member
"1 Peter contains no evidence at all of familiarity with the earthly Jesus, his life, his teaching, and his death, but makes reference only in a general way to the 'sufferings' of Christ. It is scarcely conceivable that Peter would neither have sought to strengthen his authority by referring to his personal connections with Jesus nor have referred to the example of Jesus in some way." (W. G. Kümmel, Introduction to the New Testament, p. 424)
Wow, wow, wow ,,, hehehe.

This is Peter talking:

2 Pet. 1:16 No, it was not by following artfully contrived false stories that we made known to you the power and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, but rather, we were eyewitnesses of his magnificence. 17 For he received from God the Father honor and glory when words such as these were conveyed to him by the magnificent glory: “This is my Son, my beloved, whom I myself have approved.” 18 Yes, these words we heard coming from heaven while we were with him in the holy mountain.

Now I understand better someone who used to talk a lot about fake news. LOL.
Where do these people come from? And how come they sell so much?

2 Tim. 4:3 For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the healthful teaching, but, in accord with their own desires, they will accumulate teachers for themselves to have their ears tickled; 4 and they will turn their ears away from the truth, whereas they will be turned aside to false stories. 5 You, though, keep your senses in all things, suffer evil, do [the] work of an evangelizer, fully accomplish your ministry.
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
"1 Peter contains no evidence at all of familiarity with the earthly Jesus, his life, his teaching, and his death, but makes reference only in a general way to the 'sufferings' of Christ. It is scarcely conceivable that Peter would neither have sought to strengthen his authority by referring to his personal connections with Jesus nor have referred to the example of Jesus in some way." (W. G. Kümmel, Introduction to the New Testament, p. 424)
You forgot my rules. You need a link dude!

1 Peter

As our great revered leader said "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Men say out loud to all the human public I want gods power. Tells you. He wants it. Yet he also wants to change it to a resource equation.

Rationally does not want gods power at all. He's greedy and he wants a new resource.

Your life body is God he claims and I want my new resource to be your bio body human contacts. I need the contacts to channel it to my machine.

As if humans enter the alien machine to be life removed.

Your Jesus he says. Tells me I can resource gods Inherited power body by giving you activated Jesus.

Life sacrificed.

Knows it all machines as only machines he uses then says his machine created life then he uses all the same machines to attack life.

Has money in a country cold with a new machine. Money plus machine safe he says first.

Observing all of his machines by phi is historic against DNA human health bio ...animal DNA ...garden mass earths mass is now nothing. Past scientists advice told.

All those bodies sacrificed gone out of presence of form is his advice he's using now.

Destroyed and gone. Machines activated gods heavens destroyed life his exact answer. Science.

The scientists thesis my science history about the past was God powers and life gone is my want a resource now.

Via heavens mass.

All answers are given.

Past answers is past life is past life data and his God science causes. Removed it already. As he's present man bodily mind claiming I'm safe not science data. Ignored.

Knows the theme.

Known to him in mind as a thinker now.

So we said they are satanist humans our destroyer.

Pretty basic.

So liars Said I need the coldest of cold space only as mass and it's origins are the hottest of hot. From space only position.

Balanced mutual together now.

Our bio heavens...cold....by burning it as HE he says is the entry.

He meaning man I thought about it.

My he will.

He'll or he will cause it. Hebrew Egyptian science terms is window. HELL..EL power of God named he said.

Tells you all. Man did it.

Releases an article saying I will poison you all family by human controls advice as humans by humans thoughts humans as human motivations.

No one is really doing anything!

Why?

Oh we believe in holy God holy God saves us. Evil god will destroy his life.

Okay he's a human.

That's okay I'll live in heavens after so it won't matter if we all die as humans someday some how we all die.

Oh you'll be a record in heavens after then with God?

Yes.

Oh that's not a resource advice Satan brother. Cold blue God earth heavens power blue body.

Human mind.

Humans suffering a varied experience in mind status.... I heard humans praying please save us assist us.

So the blue kachina star said American Indian...a sky blue beam of power comes from out of space.

Our heavens gases are not beams it's waters mass that sees blue as the gas spirit burning.

We don't see blue nuclear star mass burning above. Water shows Blue. Blue isn't a star we see blue through water. Sky eye.

Is kachina old memories?

Of course it is. Old sciences of men destroyed life.

America.
A crime A origin scene of science crime.

Science says I need mass to cross in origin science of man's American memories. Origin science of man is point America history America as first.

American theist says my thesis carbon moment for bio human AI technology. American.

History English European. Invaded by Roman evil past...DNA memory changed by man's Roman sex. Last thesis abominated life Roman memory in mans mind history.

Blamed Rome today theist America.

How isn't it American life nuclear star hit burnt to death by alien Inva Sion always movie theme depicted,? Origin man's thesis memory.

Whilst money plus machine is safe in a snow iced country?

Teaching says women mother adult can live bodily without a womb ovary.

A small body inside her body created man's life.

Theist says today he's two men as man woman in one human body. Why he claims he's safe to rid one human body of life in theories.

Theisms ignores the one human woman's life continuance is by mutual sex.

Theist man's mind I'm pretending I'm a man and a woman now is new homosexual behaviours with child rape mind human causes. An adult man's data thesis of holy books used.

A status a father's consciousness first never expressed,!

Two men as natural man thinks abnormal ....I want gods science powers in the same one body. One man.

Yet in mind pretends he three types ..natural life...theists life a woman man too.

Yet the cell a woman's converts back by man's presence into a man's body...not any woman.

No theist owns two human bodies in one body. As man of science mind changed the warning.

Is the warning teaching.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Wow, wow, wow ,,, hehehe.

This is Peter talking:

2 Pet. 1:16 No, it was not by following artfully contrived false stories that we made known to you the power and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, but rather, we were eyewitnesses of his magnificence. 17 For he received from God the Father honor and glory when words such as these were conveyed to him by the magnificent glory: “This is my Son, my beloved, whom I myself have approved.” 18 Yes, these words we heard coming from heaven while we were with him in the holy mountain.

Now I understand better someone who used to talk a lot about fake news. LOL.
Where do these people come from? And how come they sell so much?
Did you not see that the author of that only claimed to be an eyewitness? How does that help you at all? You cannot even judge by that whether he was a witness or not. It is just a puff of hot air in this debate.

One supposed line. Pretty slim pickings.

Have you read why it is thought that Peter was not the author?

EDIT: Oh wait, there is almost no doubt that 2 Peter was not by Peter. I thought that you were quoting from 1 Peter.

Second Epistle of Peter - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Top