• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Thief on the Cross

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Agreed but I do not know where they got it.
Paradise has many different applications.

I think I was a bit confusing. Heaven is on Earth when all is said and done. I do not know what is going on with the thief and unlike others will not speculate about such an obscure issue.

This is the actual issue I have been interested in discussing. I do not much care about commas. I will just say a word now but I hope you will instead concentrate on this issue. The thief did none of the things you mention yet is or will be with Christ in Heaven.

This man:
New Living Translation (©2007)
But if the work is burned up, the builder will suffer great loss. The builder will be saved, but like someone barely escaping through a wall of flames.
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/3-15.htm
This man had not one single work that passed the refiners fire yet he was saved.


Your verses are unclear. Most commentators suggest James is contrasting the effects of two types of faith and is not in anyway claiming works are a necessity for salvation for example. My verses have no other meaning even possible. They clearly show people who did not do what you claim they must went to heaven. I hope we can dig into this issue in depth instead of punctuation.

First you say you don't know....and then in the next paragraph state as if you are certain the outcome.

And instead of stepping up from punctuation....
Why not step up altogether.... into the meaning and intent.
No more recitals.
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
First you say you don't know....and then in the next paragraph state as if you are certain the outcome.
I am bored thief so I will clear up this very simple misunderstanding but I do not have enough time for unimportant things like defining what paradise is or punctuation.

This statement by me: I do not know what is going on with the thief
I meant I do not know if the thief is currently in heaven, currently in paradise and will be in heaven, or is in Sheol and will be in paradise in teh future. I did not mean I do not know if he was saved or not.

This can easily be seen from my next statement: The thief did none of the things you mention yet is or will be with Christ in Heaven.

This is where I explained that the thief’s ultimate destination is not in doubt according to the Bible but his current location is debatable, but not one I wish to have as it has little to do with the issue I have been discussing. What is necessary to be saved?

I hope you see there was never any contradiction nor a changing of what I claim.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I am bored thief so I will clear up this very simple misunderstanding but I do not have enough time for unimportant things like defining what paradise is or punctuation.

This statement by me: I do not know what is going on with the thief
I meant I do not know if the thief is currently in heaven, currently in paradise and will be in heaven, or is in Sheol and will be in paradise in teh future. I did not mean I do not know if he was saved or not.

This can easily be seen from my next statement: The thief did none of the things you mention yet is or will be with Christ in Heaven.

This is where I explained that the thief’s ultimate destination is not in doubt according to the Bible but his current location is debatable, but not one I wish to have as it has little to do with the issue I have been discussing. What is necessary to be saved?

I hope you see there was never any contradiction nor a changing of what I claim.

Well then.....what was the saving grace?
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
Well then.....what was the saving grace?
This is the fourth and last time I am going to explain this. If you do not actually want an answer then why keep asking for it?

Grace is not an object, nor a ceremony, nor any other work. It is a concept. The definition of grace is to receive that which is not merited. In ours as well as the thief’s case we do not deserve heaven but receive it because of grace applied by faith. Another example of this is that Abraham was declared righteous the instant he believed God. He did not add any works, ceremony’s, and certainly no parables yet written or baptism yet practiced. He believed and was legally declared righteous.

New International Version (©2011)
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith--and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—

Grace is applied to our account when we believe. Also not that salvation is not the gift from God but the gift of God. God (in the person of the Holy Spirit) comes to live with the NT believer and that is what produces the spiritual events in the Born again experience. I hope that ends this what is grace broken record. If not ask now because I will not do this after this point.

If you replace the word "grace" in that verse with "receiving that which you do not deserve" you will see it even clearer. Also note saved is past tense and no one can unseal what God has sealed until the resurrection.
 
Last edited:

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
The Thief did ask only.....'remember me'.....
The Carpenter responded in a manner showing He saw .....'something else'.

Well stated Thief. (I am wondering if your screenname has some identification with the man in question) :)

It was an observation, made in the form of a promise. It was not one that the Jews were unfamiliar with.

All ancient Jews believed in the physical resurrection of the dead to the re-established kingdom of God in literal Israel on earth under Messiah's kingship.

Judaism, like Christendom, split into sects with differing beliefs about how the scriptures should be interpreted.

The Sadducees did not hold the resurrection (among other things) to be true, whereas the Pharisees did. (Acts 23:8)

If we take an overview of that basic belief, and examine how it got all twisted up in misinterpretation, we will see how man has painted a completely different picture to how the scriptures were originally understood. The devil of course has been behind the scenes pulling the strings and laughing at our gullibility.

Lets try to put it as simply as we can.....

In the beginning, God's first purpose was to have perfect human beings inhabit a specially prepared planet and fill it with their 'kind'. He also told them to 'subdue' the earth, which basically meant to bring the land outside the garden under his care and control. So originally God intended for man to be the caretaker of his handiwork, being held responsible for looking after the animals, the earth itself and each other.

The garden was a blueprint for what God wanted the whole earth to become. God supplied all the raw materials and allowed man's own creativity to do the rest. He had made them strong and healthy, fully prepared for physical work with the ability to feel immense satisfaction at a job well done. As perfect creatures reflecting their Maker's qualities, they had no defects to prevent them from carrying out their assignment perfectly. If things had gone to plan, we would all be enjoying that paradise with them right now.

Unending life however, was to be enjoyed on the condition of their continued obedience....but there was a rebel in the camp! :(

For aeons of unknown time, one of God's magnificent spirit creatures was harboring ambitions that were out of harmony with his God assigned station. As a being who also possessed free will, no doubt this creature had thought long and hard about how he could move up the chain of command and even become a god himself. That is not something one can do when surrounded by beings of equal power. At best, all he could be was their leader. He already held a high station as a Cherub, but it was obviously not enough for him...he wanted more. (Ezek 28:12-14)

With the creation of lesser beings, this one saw his chance to fulfill his ambitions.

Who knows what he thought he could accomplish by his actions. Perhaps he underestimated that God would block access to the tree of life? :shrug:

As a 'covering Cherub' in the garden, he was there sizing up the situation and waiting for an opportune time to make his move.

When the woman was alone he took the opportunity to plant seeds of doubt in the newer less experience member of the human race. (he still targets the weak and inexperienced) He knew that Adam had waited a long time for a mate of his own, so if he could get the woman to disobey the only command there was that carried a death penalty, he hoped he could get the man to follow her in rebellion. He figured right. Divide and conquer works!

It was stated that the woman was "thoroughly deceived" by the words of the serpent.....but Adam was not. It was through the man that sin entered into the world. (Rom 5:12) His decision was made as a wilfull and deliberate act of defiance.

Once the knowledge of good and evil was unleashed, there was no way to take it back. God stepped in immediately with a solution to redeem Adam's future children who would inherit the defect of sin and continue to pass it on indefinitely.

A seed would come to deliver a fatal death blow to the head of the serpent and undo all the evil that he had caused, but not until a heel wound had been inflicted by him. (Gen 3:15)

Time is a very important factor to understand in the outworking of God's purpose concerning the seed. The events in Eden were over 4,000 years ago. The appearance of the seed and the heel wound (Christ's death, from which he was resurrected) took place 2,000 years ago. Are we getting some idea of God's timeframe? He does not operate in earth time, but in universal time. Why? Because the original rebel was not human. He was an angel who operates in the same timeframe as the Creator and needs to be dealt with in that time.

In human years, it has been an extraordinarily LONG time, but in God's counting of time, (1,000 years as one day. 2 Pet 2:8) he basically gave the devil a week to prove that he was the better choice of ruler over the human race.

God's promise of a seed was later recorded by Moses and taught to Abraham's descendants who became God's nation. The seed of promise was to come through the tribe of Judah and he was to establish his kingdom on earth with a temple and a priesthood. He was to be a priest "in the manner of Melchizedek", who was both a king and a priest before the nation of Israel was formed. Once the tribal system was established, kings could only come from one tribe and priests from another, making it impossible for one to be both.

The idea of a promised earthly king, sent by God to rule over his people stayed with Israel right up until Christ came. But Jesus did not fit their ideas of a political ruler who would liberate Israel from Roman bondage and oppression and re-establish Israel as an independent nation once more. Jesus came as a gentle (weak from their perspective) prophet, giving sincere ones refreshment from the impossibly strict rules of the Pharisees and the fanatical political ideals and violence of the radicals. Jesus re-established the true way to serve God....spiritually. This is what the Jews had lost. They had become entangled in legalism and forgotten about love and mercy.

Jesus' disciples did not understand the spiritual true nature of his teachings until after his death. They still expected him to establish his kingdom on earth right up to the time when he returned to his Father. (Acts1:6)

It was not until Pentecost that holy spirit revealed the true spiritual nature of the kingdom. Jews had no notion of going to heaven...they expected to be rulers on earth with a physical temple and an earthly priesthood. It is what their scriptures had always taught them. But now things were taking on a whole new perspective. Paul called it a "sacred secret" which was gradually revealed by God's spirit, unfolding as time went on.

With their anointing came a desire they had never had before....the desire to leave their earthly home and go to heaven to be with their Lord. They were given a demonstration of the power of holy spirit to perform miracles, to heal the sick and even to raise the dead. Something that would take place on a grand scale in the new earth to come.

Now lets see what happened to twist everything up so that there are way too many interpretations of what it all means.

The Jews still await their Messiah, who has never come. Fleshly Israel is still waiting to be re-established in their homeland under the rule of the Messiah, the "Prince of Peace". But Israel in in a terrible state politically, at war with the Palestinians and trying to ally themselves with other nations for support as they have always done. God punished his ancient nation for doing this. Their condition is anything but peaceful.

Christians have completely missed the point of the kingdom, imagining that everyone has to go to heaven for some reason.

The original purpose of God never went away or got lost in the outworking. It has always remained the same. It is man who has messed it up.....with a little help from the adversary, whose main M O is confusion.

What Adam lost, (paradise on earth) will be given back by the sacrifice of the seed and the reconciling of sinful mankind back with their heavenly Father.

Christ came to choose the members of his 'cabinet' and form them into a perfect working model of the temple arrangement. He is the High Priest.

Each of the compartments in the earthly temple represented a heavenly part. Each of the positions and roles of the priests are represented in the role played by those chosen to be priests with Christ in his kingdom. They are a finite number (Rev 14:1,3) and the 12 apostles form the foundations of that spiritual heavenly temple arrangement.

No one went to heaven before Christ (John 3:13) so that means that all who died before Jesus opened the way to heaven, sleep in their graves awaiting the promised resurrection when Jesus will call them out of their tombs. (John 5:28, 29) The thief will be among them.

When Christ was enthroned as King (Dan 7:13, 14) the time came for the "first resurrection" to begin. (Rev 20:6) Members of his government would begin to take up their assigned positions in the kingdom arrangement.

It was also the time for satan to be evicted from heaven to the vicinity of the earth. This means increasing woes for mankind, which we are all experiencing right now. But the devil's time of rulership is almost over. His influence over the kingdoms of the world will be stripped away and "crushed" out of existence. God's rulership will be re-established over mankind forever. (Dan 2:44)

"New Jerusalem" is the kingdom, (the bride of Christ) with Jesus as king and his "joint-heirs" to assist him, and it is to have earthly subjects. (Rev 21:1-5; Rom 8:17)

Jesus will give us back what Adam lost for his children....unending life in paradise on earth, as it was meant to be in the beginning. :yes:

:sorry1: this was so long....
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
This is the fourth and last time I am going to explain this. If you do not actually want an answer then why keep asking for it?

Grace is not an object, nor a ceremony, nor any other work. It is a concept. The definition of grace is to receive that which is not merited. In ours as well as the thief’s case we do not deserve heaven but receive it because of grace applied by faith. Another example of this is that Abraham was declared righteous the instant he believed God. He did not add any works, ceremony’s, and certainly no parables yet written or baptism yet practiced. He believed and was legally declared righteous.

New International Version (©2011)
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith--and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—

Grace is applied to our account when we believe. Also not that salvation is not the gift from God but the gift of God. God (in the person of the Holy Spirit) comes to live with the NT believer and that is what produces the spiritual events in the Born again experience. I hope that ends this what is grace broken record. If not ask now because I will not do this after this point.

If you replace the word "grace" in that verse with "receiving that which you do not deserve" you will see it even clearer. Also note saved is past tense and no one can unseal what God has sealed until the resurrection.

You can surrender the discussion anytime you care to.

As for me.....I say....
Grace means to allow.

Walk among angels?.....only by Their grace.
Walk among angels without grace?....not likely.

But of course.....you are capable of walking 'gracefully'.
At least you could think of yourself in such manner.
Many people quoting scripture believe in themselves enough to think they can.

The devil knows the scriptures....book and verse....ALL of them.
ANY book Man calls sacred.

But the devil doesn't walk with 'grace'.....does He?

As for the Thief.....his last request clearly spots the change in his mind and heart.
He found his grace in his last breath.
The Carpenter saw it.
yeah.....'and you shall walk with Me...in paradise...'
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
You can surrender the discussion anytime you care to.
What in the world was this?

As for me.....I say....
Grace means to allow.
Here is the core problem with just about every argument against the bible. As for me is the absolute worst source for theological doctrine possible. As for God is the proper understanding when it comes to what we wager our souls on. What you say based on what you think will not help. If you stand before him and he asks why were you never born again, and you reply "well as for me I think parables save and blood is metaphorical". God may reply "well as for you!!!!! Bye, next."
Walk among angels?.....only by Their grace.
Walk among angels without grace?....not likely.
But of course.....you are capable of walking 'gracefully'.
At least you could think of yourself in such manner.
Many people quoting scripture believe in themselves enough to think they can.
The devil knows the scriptures....book and verse....ALL of them.
ANY book Man calls sacred.
But the devil doesn't walk with 'grace'.....does He?
As for the Thief.....his last request clearly spots the change in his mind and heart.
He found his grace in his last breath.
The Carpenter saw it.
yeah.....'and you shall walk with Me...in paradise...'
The rest of this is close enough or unimportant enough to not disagree with. Since this was all began to show that neither parables, baptism, nor works of any kind were required for salvation and I believe you have agreed several times my claim has been upheld. What Satan knows about what books is irrelevant to my point.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
What in the world was this?
Here is the core problem with just about every argument against the bible. As for me is the absolute worst source for theological doctrine possible. As for God is the proper understanding when it comes to what we wager our souls on. What you say based on what you think will not help. If you stand before him and he asks why were you never born again, and you reply "well as for me I think parables save and blood is metaphorical". God may reply "well as for you!!!!! Bye, next."
The rest of this is close enough or unimportant enough to not disagree with. Since this was all began to show that neither parables, baptism, nor works of any kind were required for salvation and I believe you have agreed several times my claim has been upheld. What Satan knows about what books is irrelevant to my point.

Quite frankly I don't see that you ever had a 'point'.

Dismissal....as if you know the practice?.....I think not.

So if my words are close enough you won't disagree?
And yet they might not be important?

That's quite a trick you've got.
Works for you, I suppose.

But I don't see anything in your postings that show you understand ...'grace'.

So I ask again...with a shift ....
Did the Thief die gracefully?....or not?
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
Quite frankly I don't see that you ever had a 'point'.

Dismissal....as if you know the practice?.....I think not.

So if my words are close enough you won't disagree?
And yet they might not be important?

That's quite a trick you've got.
Works for you, I suppose.

But I don't see anything in your postings that show you understand ...'grace'.

So I ask again...with a shift ....
Did the Thief die gracefully?....or not?
I will answer your last query but I honestly can't figure out what you are doing half the time. You are fairly civil and you don’t type huge posts but what you are talking about and the logical procession of your thinking escapes me. So this will be my last reply for a bit anyway, you may claim it a victory of the ambiguous over the rigorous if you wish. God will sort all that out eventually.

How the thief died is of no consequence, the moment he believed he was declared righteous, grace was applied to his account, and his name written in the lambs book of life and he will be in heaven no matter what transpired after that moment. This was accomplished by the virtues of Christ alone and without respect to any parables that did not even exist in writing at the time, baptism, ceremony, nor works of any kind and that is all I wished to show and it can't get any more obviously true than in the thief's case
 

cataway

Well-Known Member
I will answer your last query but I honestly can't figure out what you are doing half the time. You are fairly civil and you don’t type huge posts but what you are talking about and the logical procession of your thinking escapes me. So this will be my last reply for a bit anyway, you may claim it a victory of the ambiguous over the rigorous if you wish. God will sort all that out eventually.

How the thief died is of no consequence, the moment he believed he was declared righteous, grace was applied to his account, and his name written in the lambs book of life and he will be in heaven no matter what transpired after that moment. This was accomplished by the virtues of Christ alone and without respect to any parables that did not even exist in writing at the time, baptism, ceremony, nor works of any kind and that is all I wished to show and it can't get any more obviously true than in the thief's case
:facepalm: a day or so earlier you said the thief was getting a resurrection to Paradise and now you said he's going to heaven :shrug:
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I will answer your last query but I honestly can't figure out what you are doing half the time. You are fairly civil and you don’t type huge posts but what you are talking about and the logical procession of your thinking escapes me. So this will be my last reply for a bit anyway, you may claim it a victory of the ambiguous over the rigorous if you wish. God will sort all that out eventually.

How the thief died is of no consequence, the moment he believed he was declared righteous, grace was applied to his account, and his name written in the lambs book of life and he will be in heaven no matter what transpired after that moment. This was accomplished by the virtues of Christ alone and without respect to any parables that did not even exist in writing at the time, baptism, ceremony, nor works of any kind and that is all I wished to show and it can't get any more obviously true than in the thief's case

It was not the declaration of the Carpenter....that made the Thief righteous.

The Thief had a change of mind and heart.
A last moment revelation.

That revelation was observed by the Carpenter.

Hence the dialog.
 

Flat Earth Kyle

Well-Known Member
As I said previously, I believe he was put on the cross because he had that change of heart before being put on the cross. He was the one guy who took up his cross and followed Christ at that moment anyway. Just because you are an apostle does not mean you are more righteous than anyone else.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
As I said previously, I believe he was put on the cross because he had that change of heart before being put on the cross. He was the one guy who took up his cross and followed Christ at that moment anyway. Just because you are an apostle does not mean you are more righteous than anyone else.

And which gospel are you using?
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
:facepalm: a day or so earlier you said the thief was getting a resurrection to Paradise and now you said he's going to heaven :shrug:
IMO the terms are synonymous. Even if they are not anyone going to paradise will eventually wind up in heaven. Unless the Catholics have invented another halfway house to Heaven that is. My point is the same either way. The thief was "saved" while talking to Christ and never baptized, followed no ceremony, or performed any works in connection with his salvation.
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
It was not the declaration of the Carpenter....that made the Thief righteous.

The Thief had a change of mind and heart.
A last moment revelation.

That revelation was observed by the Carpenter.

Hence the dialog.
I pretty much agree with this, and it still refutes your parable point and took place by virtue of God's grace alone and was made possible by his faith in Christ and the actions he was undertaking on his behalf. Did you think this makes any difference in the context we have been discussing the issue in?
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
As I said previously, I believe he was put on the cross because he had that change of heart before being put on the cross. He was the one guy who took up his cross and followed Christ at that moment anyway. Just because you are an apostle does not mean you are more righteous than anyone else.
There are no verses that indicate he had come to faith prior to being hung on the cross. There are further no verses that indicate he was put on the cross for any other reason than theft. And there are certainly none that indicate that anything beyond faith allowed the thief to be saved. Being killed for theft is not what "taking up your cross" means. I did not understand the apostle point.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I pretty much agree with this, and it still refutes your parable point and took place by virtue of God's grace alone and was made possible by his faith in Christ and the actions he was undertaking on his behalf. Did you think this makes any difference in the context we have been discussing the issue in?

The point of parables seems misappropriated.

For the Thief....he may have heard them....he may have seen the Carpenter prior to their meeting on the cross....
Hence the Thief's knowing the Carpenter was harmless.

Parables as saving grace for the Thief?.....perhaps.....or maybe not.

But I thought we covered that, so much earlier.

As for the saving grace.....
Coming to grace is a willful act....on the part of the believer.
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
The point of parables seems misappropriated.

For the Thief....he may have heard them....he may have seen the Carpenter prior to their meeting on the cross....
Hence the Thief's knowing the Carpenter was harmless.

Parables as saving grace for the Thief?.....perhaps.....or maybe not.

But I thought we covered that, so much earlier.

As for the saving grace.....
Coming to grace is a willful act....on the part of the believer.
We seem to be going in circles. The reason I posted in this forum was to show and discuss the fact that only grace can save. It seems the thief by your own admission is proof or an example of this. I think we are very close about grace. I will add that grace is a commodity that only God has. We believe and HE applies grace to our account. That is exactly what I came here to show. I am unclear what else we have to contend about if you have abandoned your parable claims.
 
Top