"The Top 10 Claims Made by Creationists to Counter Scientific Theories"

[Faithofchristian]

So, outside of the Bible you have nothing to base this claim on, right? No evidence other than claims made in the Bible?

Well for one, we have the dinosaurs bones giving witness.
As for another, as for a Christian all my evidence lays inside of the Bible.
You may not like it, But then that's you and not me.

 

[exchemist]

The Bible is merely a book of claims written by human beings thousands of years ago, though. So, how is it evidence of anything?

It seems to me a big mistake to view the bible as "a book of claims". There is a discussion on how to treat the bible on another concurrent thread here: Truth

 

[Faithofchristian]

These, for example:

"So my point is, There were no humans beings of flesh and blood at the time of the dinosaurs.
But man was there at the time of the dinosaurs."



What people say is a claim. "Because I say so" is not evidence.



I could say the same of you. What I am asking for is evidence that verifies what they wrote.

There's been nothing found to give evidence that dinosaurs and human beings live together on the earth.

But there's plenty of evidence in the Bible that gives support that man and dinosaurs were together here on earth.

Do you know the difference between
Celestial man and the Terrestrial man ?

What's the difference between them ?

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

But there's plenty of evidence in the Bible that gives support that man and dinosaurs were together here on earth.

I say that leprechauns make rainbows.

Is that evidence for leprechauns making rainbows?

Do you know the difference between
Celestial man and the Terrestrial man ?

What's the difference between them ?

You can define them however you want. What I am interested in is the evidence that "Celestial man" exists or did exist.

 

[Faithofchristian]

I say that leprechauns make rainbows.

Is that evidence for leprechauns making rainbows?



You can define them however you want. What I am interested in is the evidence that "Celestial man" exists or did exist.

Hey look no one says you have believe anything, just because I believe, What is that to you.

 

[exchemist]

Hey look no one says you have believe anything, just because I believe, What is that to you.

You are the one asking people to tell you the difference between "Terrestrial" man and "Celestial" man. Why ask people to get engaged on these questions you pose, if you won't deal with the responses that you invited?

 

[Faithofchristian]

You are the one asking people to tell you the difference between "Terrestrial" man and "Celestial" man. Why ask people to get engaged on these questions you pose, if you won't deal with the responses that you invited?

Maybe if people really wants to know, then why go about what someone believes, which has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

 

[exchemist]

Maybe if people really wants to know, then why go about what someone believes, which has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

No. We don't particularly want to know. But it is you asking us to respond to you. So we have. And now, having induced that reaction, you won't deal with it!

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

Hey look no one says you have believe anything, just because I believe, What is that to you.

I am asking if you think this is evidence for leprechauns making rainbows:

"I say that leprechauns make rainbows."--Thermos aquaticus

 

[Polymath257]

There's been nothing found to give evidence that dinosaurs and human beings live together on the earth.

But there's plenty of evidence in the Bible that gives support that man and dinosaurs were together here on earth.

Sorry, but that doesn't constitute evidence.

Do you know the difference between
Celestial man and the Terrestrial man ?

What's the difference between them ?

I really don't care unless you can give evidence independent of your specific interpretation of your religious text. Until you can give actual evidence to support *any* type of human being alive at the time of the dinosaurs, it is something that can be dismissed as irrelevant.

 

[Faithofchristian]

No. We don't particularly want to know. But it is you asking us to respond to you. So we have. And now, having induced that reaction, you won't deal with it!

Now as to why would I care what you may think what I believe.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

Now as to why would I care what you may think what I believe.

This is a debate forum, so there is an expectation that people are making arguments that are meant to convince others.

 

[Faithofchristian]

Sorry, but that doesn't constitute evidence.



I really don't care unless you can give evidence independent of your specific interpretation of your religious text. Until you can give actual evidence to support *any* type of human being alive at the time of the dinosaurs, it is something that can be dismissed as irrelevant.

As to how many times do I have to repeat myself, There were no human beings during the time of the dinosaurs.

But man was there with the dinosaurs.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

As to how many times do I have to repeat myself, There were no human beings during the time of the dinosaurs.

But man was there with the dinosaurs.

How many times do we need to repeat ourselves?

What evidence do you have for this claim?

 

[Subduction Zone]

How many times do we need to repeat ourselves?

What evidence do you have for this claim?

Been there done that. He has no evidence. He merely has a circular argument that it has to be his way since his personal beliefs would be wrong if that was,not the case.

 

[Faithofchristian]

How many times do we need to repeat ourselves?

What evidence do you have for this claim?

My evidence is this, do you know, Who the Celestial man is.
Do you know who the Terrestrial man is.

The Celestial man is of the earth.
The Terrestrial man is of the Spirit world.

Now the question is, which one do you suppose was here with the dinosaurs ?

 

[Polymath257]

As to how many times do I have to repeat myself, There were no human beings during the time of the dinosaurs.

But man was there with the dinosaurs.

OK, so this 'man' wasn't human? What was he/it then? What actual evidence do you have for the existence of this 'man' (and no, your religious text doesn't provide evidence).

 

[Polymath257]

My evidence is this, do you know, Who the Celestial man is.
Do you know who the Terrestrial man is.

The Celestial man is of the earth.
The Terrestrial man is of the Spirit world.

Now the question is, which one do you suppose was here with the dinosaurs ?

Not only do I not know, I don't care unless you can provide evidence of either one existing at the time of the dinosaurs.

 

[Faithofchristian]

OK, so this 'man' wasn't human? What was he/it then? What actual evidence do you have for the existence of this 'man' (and no, your religious text doesn't provide evidence).

My bible does provide the evidence, just because you can't accept it, doesn't mean it's not there.
It shows how little you know.

 

[Polymath257]

My bible does provide the evidence, just because you can't accept it, doesn't mean it's not there.
It shows how little you know.

What evidence does it give of conditions 65 million years ago? None. It was written within the last 3000 years by people that didn't know about dinosaurs.

Provide *actual* evidence, not some story.