• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The truth about 9/11

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Hint....
BEG8
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Yes, the public, the courts, and the government that was out to get her all say she's nuts, but you've got an inside line. My giant laser from space joke probably makes sense to her.
See if Mz. Lindauer has a spare tinfoil hat you can borrow before they get you, too.

I bet you think that her editor is a looney too.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Oops! Had the wrong pic above.
Here's the editor trying to sell something to Mr Douglas.....

well...as a defender of Capitalism you should admire an editor that publishes false information in order to reach the profit maximization- because that book is a seller
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
well...as a defender of Capitalism you should admire an editor that publishes false information in order to reach the profit maximization- because that book is a seller
More power to'm!
We know such works as the "Fargo Syndrome".
Call it a "true story", but we all know better.
Michael Moore is one of the largest practitioners.
 

factseeker88

factseeker88

No need to come unglued. It's just my opinion.

[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]When we remember [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]we are all mad, [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. Mark Twain[/FONT]


“[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The only consequence is WHAT WE DO.”[/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif][/FONT][FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]John Ruskin (1819 - 1900) [/FONT]
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Citing Susan Lindauer practically barbeques whatever point one was trying to make.


honestly , dear. You underestimate the CIA's power.
the CIA is even able to find out how many times a day you go to the bathroom.
Then why shouldn't it be able to discover the planning of a terrorist attack?
 

Wirey

Fartist
honestly , dear. You underestimate the CIA's power.
the CIA is even able to find out how many times a day you go to the bathroom.
Then why shouldn't it be able to discover the planning of a terrorist attack?

The CIA is a government agency. You're thinking of Jesus.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
The CIA is a government agency. You're thinking of Jesus.

Seriously, dear mister. Could you put some source attesting that Susan Lindauer has been debunked?
If you are so sure about that, you must have read something somewhere.
 

Wirey

Fartist
Seriously, dear mister. Could you put some source attesting that Susan Lindauer has been debunked?
If you are so sure about that, you must have read something somewhere.

Could you put one refuting that she was found mentally unfit to stand trial when she was charged with helping Iraq during the Gulf War?

Susan Lindauer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/17/nyregion/17lindauer.html?_r=0

Note the times refers to her as a Congressional aide and journalist, not a CIA employee. Also note the government didn't say she was fit, they agreed with the court. She's the one claiming she's sane enough to be charged with treason. She is a nut, plain and simple, and if you believe her, you too, except fot the plain part.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Note the times refers to her as a Congressional aide and journalist, not a CIA employee. Also note the government didn't say she was fit, they agreed with the court. She's the one claiming she's sane enough to be charged with treason. She is a nut, plain and simple, and if you believe her, you too, except fot the plain part.

have you ever watched some conferences of hers?
She is capable of answering complicated questions from the audience. and she's capable of debating with disagreeing people.
This suffices to define her a person of sound mind.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
have you ever watched some conferences of hers?
She is capable of answering complicated questions from the audience. and she's capable of debating with disagreeing people.
This suffices to define her a person of sound mind.
Not necessarily, Hay85, since a strongly delusional person can appear to be quite lucid and sound.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Saying that a person is crazy in order to discredit their testimony is a very outdated and squalid trick.
She's wrong because her loopy claims are unsupported post-digested haggis.
"Crazy" is just an explanation for her difficulties.

When I talk about Politics, people say I'm retarded too.
This is just too easy.
 
Top