lilithu
The Devil's Advocate
uuworld.org : pete stark's untroubled humanismUnfortunately, in the U.S. Congress, if you dare mention you don't believe in god, they'd probably haul you away in a paddy wagon. So much for religious tolerance.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
uuworld.org : pete stark's untroubled humanismUnfortunately, in the U.S. Congress, if you dare mention you don't believe in god, they'd probably haul you away in a paddy wagon. So much for religious tolerance.
NyTimes said:The founders were not anti-religion. Many of them were faithful in their personal lives, and in their public language they evoked God. They grounded the founding principle of the nation — that all men are created equal — in the divine. But they wanted faith to be one thread in the country’s tapestry, not the whole tapestry.
In the 1790s, in the waters off Tripoli, pirates were making sport of American shipping near the Barbary Coast. Toward the end of his second term, Washington sent Joel Barlow, the diplomat-poet, to Tripoli to settle matters, and the resulting treaty, finished after Washington left office, bought a few years of peace. Article 11 of this long-ago document says that “as the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,” there should be no cause for conflict over differences of “religious opinion” between countries.
The treaty passed the Senate unanimously. Mr. McCain is not the only American who would find it useful reading.
ARTICLE 11 said:As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
Do you know this for a fact, or just assume it?Unfortunately, in the U.S. Congress, if you dare mention you don't believe in god, they'd probably haul you away in a paddy wagon. So much for religious tolerance.
He can't know it for a fact because it's not true.Do you know this for a fact, or just assume it?
Unfortunately, in the U.S. Congress, if you dare mention you don't believe in god, they'd probably haul you away in a paddy wagon. So much for religious tolerance.
It was not allegory. It was hyperbole.Jes - I think the message was allegorical only, there is a very strong prejudice generally against atheistic politicians.
Unitarianism is not based on Christianity; it comes from Christianity. We have many non-theists in our congregations and some of the most prominent people in the atheist movement, signers of the Humanist Manifestos were/are UUs.Also Unitarianism is still based upon Christianity, so this guy is not exactly a total theistic outcast.
The Congressional branch and the Executive branch of U.S. govt are separate.I think Logician was making a point about the omnipresent influence of Christianity (or something like it) in the higher echelons of the US administration...and a valid one I think given the overtly theistic flavour of much of what the president and other american statesmen have to say on various matters.
So is Tony Blair.Like Bush saying God supports america, a while back..
Ridiculous, everyone knows God is British...
That is what logician should have said, yes.The point still remains that a politician in almost every area of the cannot claim he is an atheist and get elected, because of the tremendous prejudice against atheists in the U.S.
I know the religion of only about three congressmen in the entire Senate, and that's only because they belong to my religion. The rest I have no clue, whether they're atheist or not.The point still remains that a politician in almost every area of the cannot claim he is an atheist and get elected, because of the tremendous prejudice against atheists in the U.S.
Really, I haven't seen any. Maybe it's your interpretation that is at fault.
Some people just can't see what's in front of them......
Do we have religious tolerance of other religions....YES.
Muslim, Hindu, Judasim....all are against homosexuality and same-sex marriage. So no, you're point doesn't stand.
Agreed.Was the US founded as a Christian nation? No.
Agreed.Is Christianity the prevelant religion in America? Yes.
Nope. Christianity was the prevalent religion in the U.S. when it was founded, and it was not a Christian nation at that time. Christianity is still the prevalent religion in the U.S. now, but less so than at our nation's founding. So if it wasn't a Christian nation then, on what basis is it a Christian nation now?So, has America turned INTO a Christian nation....YES.
In theory, yes. In practice, not particularly.Do we have religious tolerance of other religions....YES.
I may be stepping on some toes here, but oh well. I'm sure the backlash will be severe. Was the US founded as a Christian nation? No. Is Christianity the prevelant religion in America? Yes. So, has America turned INTO a Christian nation....YES. Do we have religious tolerance of other religions....YES. I'm perfectly ok with that. You guys are right, the founding fathers knew enough to know that they didn't know everything, they wanted the US to continue to grow and we have, into a Christian nation with Christian ideals. I'm fine with that (obviously). Regardless of how it makes others feel, that's the truth.