Definately not what he might do,she had no other choice.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The UK is not as bad as Venezuela
- Thread starter Notanumber
- Start date
Definately not what he might do,she had no other choice.
Last edited:
So your Cristal ball is real?
No choice but to fund terrorism and fundamentalism just to prop up the much lorded mandate that she lost
You have to be kidding me.
May is supporting and funding Saudi Arabia, the cradle of terrorism.
And you excuse that?
Saudi is the cradle of Islam,I never said terrorism,do you really think we could fund Saudi lol.
Tell may what it is because it seems that she doesn't
,
More propaganda,its not very impressive is it.
I think you kid yourself.
The Emperor of Mankind
Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
That's not exactly a ringing endorsement of privatisation. After 30 years of being in private ownership the railways are in a sorry state and we're paying foreign companies through the nose to use them. And it seems quite strange that you're against investing in something that would inevitably bring a return on that investment but you're in favour of Trident which will more than likely cost substantially more and just sit there doing nothing. And yet you condemn liberal spending.
The vast majority of the world's countries get by fine without one. And if you're in favour of renewing Trident you don't have any business criticising anyone else for liberal or wreckless spending.
Yes, really. The UK's policies are London-centric and always have been. Why do you think they talk about a Northern powerhouse but the north of England is the poorest region? Domestic movement within a nation is not the same as movement across borders between nations. Nice try but false equivalence.
Fair point. It's one of my points of contention with Corbyn - he favours independence for everyone except Scotland. What a hypocrite. And at least we agree that if you sell someone a weapon then you become culpable in any crime they commit. At least we're on the same page about May's foreign policy. I also don't like to think what would happen to Israel if Hamas ever gained the upper hand.
Gladly.
May's Government is supplying the Saudis with British armaments and is even suppressing a report which shows she knows her claim that "selling the Saudis arms keeps Britain safe" is an outright lie - and is thereby covering for their reputation here at home.
If Corbyn were caught selling arms to the IRA you'd call him a traitor. And you'd be right. So since May is selling arms to the biggest foreign funders of terrorism in the UK, what does that make her?
Yes, I fully accept that you find it easy.
Last edited:
She is giving it a god try
So says lord hawhaw
Actually everything in that clip is based on fact. Interesting that you deny fact
What? That you can not foretell the future? I think not
Lets see those facts then.
No need to fortell the future.
The judge who ruled Tory policy causes 'real misery for no good purpose' just proved why they have to go
Lords warned they will have powers cut if they stop Theresa May's Brexit
Nicola Sturgeon just said what everyone suspected about Brexit
3m EU citizens in UK could lose right to stay if we leave, Downing Street indicates | Daily Mail Online
Britain has rejected hard Brexit
Business leaders' support for Tories is a threat to democracy
Bur feel free to ignore and mock, seems to be your style
Notanumber
A Free Man
So how do you know the future?
Ahh the right wing press told you... Got it
Hard brexit would be the way to go,you cant negotiate up from a soft approach.
I doubt that many will have to leave,since the brexit vote many are leaving anyway.
Since when has your doubt been government policy. Ahh got it, clairvoyance again
And i note you haven't mentioned any of the other points