• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Uneducated Anti-Assault Rifle Warriors. Yea!!!

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Of course it does! How can anyone take a protest seriously if the participants don't have an in depth knowledge of what they are protesting?
I completely disagree.

But are you being sarcastic here?
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I completely disagree.

But are you being sarcastic here?
Not at all. Why would you protest something if you don't have an understanding as to what that something is? I mean, am I wrong in that someone should understand what they are protesting? I don't understand the perspective of being ignorant on a topic and protesting it anyway.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Not at all. Why would you protest something if you don't have an understanding as to what that something is? I mean, am I wrong in that someone should understand what they are protesting? I don't understand the perspective of being ignorant on a topic and protesting it anyway.
One can protest that an industry is poisoning the local water supply by effluents without understanding the chemical reactions that are causing it. Here people are protesting the rise in mass shootings in public places that target innocents, even children and the fact that the government has crafted no policy on reducing and preventing these. The demands are simple. Make laws that prevent such people from owning guns legally. Nothing else needs to be known at all.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Knowing that 191 innocent people died from multiple mass shootings involving AR15 style rifles since 2012 is probably more important than knowing the difference between a clip and a magazine.
Some clarifications please: Where did you get the number 191? I know what a mass shooting is, but what is a “multiple mass shooting”? What is an “AR15 style”?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The demands are simple. Make laws that prevent such people from owning guns legally. Nothing else needs to be known at all.
And therein lies the problem, ie, eschewing other useful measures.
Lack of understanding leads to simplistic demands & poor results.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
And therein lies the problem, ie, eschewing other useful measures.
Lack of understanding leads to simplistic demands & poor results.
I disagree. The law makers are tasked to know the details and formulate effective laws, the citizens need only assess the results on the ground, and if found inadequate, push the lawmakers to do more.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I disagree. The law makers are tasked to know the details and formulate effective laws, the citizens need only assess the results on the ground, and if found inadequate, push the lawmakers to do more.
Intelligent & thoughtful pushing is better than uninformed ranting.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Intelligent & thoughtful pushing is better than uninformed ranting.
No. I believe in specialization. Its the job of the mechanic to fix my car, it the job of the doctor to cure me, and its the job of the politician to formulate laws that protect me from mass shooters. If they fail in their jobs we protest, criticize and sack them like any other service provider .
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I disagree. The law makers are tasked to know the details and formulate effective laws, the citizens need only assess the results on the ground, and if found inadequate, push the lawmakers to do more.
Do more what, exactly? That is the question that these students that I mentioned can't answer. If you ask them "What piece of legislation, specifically, do you disagree with?" They can't answer it because they don't know what it is or how it works. You cannot demand change without offering a reasonable alternative. These students can't do that so they can't demand anything in any legitimate capacity.

The demands are simple. Make laws that prevent such people from owning guns legally.
It isn't that simple.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Some clarifications please: Where did you get the number 191?

Mass shootings in the United States - Wikipedia I added the deaths (excluding assailants) from the mass shootings that involved semi-auto rifles from 2012 to present. And that number is actually 203, as I forgot to add the Aurora victims.

I know what a mass shooting is, but what is a “multiple mass shooting”?

How is this even a question? It means more than one mass shooting, obviously; Sandy Hook, Orlando night club, Las Vegas concert, Texas church, etc, etc.

What is an “AR15 style”?

Semi-auto rifles with large magazines and configured for rapid fire, based on designs intended for combat rather than sporting or hunting purposes. (and I'm not referring to mere aesthetics. Otherwise, why don't hunters use AR15s or similar?)
FYI, I don't support an outright ban, but obviously they're too easily accessable.
 
Last edited:

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Do more what, exactly? That is the question that these students that I mentioned can't answer. If you ask them "What piece of legislation, specifically, do you disagree with?" They can't answer it because they don't know what it is or how it works. You cannot demand change without offering a reasonable alternative. These students can't do that so they can't demand anything in any legitimate capacity.


It isn't that simple.
No its exactly that simple. Its not incumbent on me to tell the mechanic how to fix my car. Its their duty to it, so that it works again. Same here.
Its the politicians job to figure out how to do it. They are the lawmakers. Get at it. Chop chop. They are responsible to bring out a set of laws on guns that will stop or lower mass shooting incidents. We will see how effective they actually are and vote them up in or out accordingly. Same with issues regarding employment , govt. debt, education etc. etc.
 
Last edited:

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
No its exactly that simple. Its not incumbent on me to tell the mechanic how to fix my car. Its their duty to it, so that it works again. Same here.
Its the politicians job to figure out how to do it. They are the lawmakers. Get at it. Chop chop. They are responsible to bring out a set of laws on guns that will stop or lower mass shooting incidents. We will see how effective they actually are and vote them up in or out accordingly. Same with issues regarding employment , govt. debt, education etc. etc.
I admire your passion.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
If one kid shows up at one school with an AR15 and another kid shows up at another school with a rock, who will have the higher body count?
that wasn't the point.....

but point taken

return fire with sufficient fire

not that teachers should be encumbered with AR15s
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
picture the pending scenario.....

the teachers carry guns
the bad guy enters the school
the bad guy opens fire
some die

someone returns fire

bad guy dies

the media have a new hero
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Gun fanatics as per usual underestimate gun legislations ability to regulate the more deadly tools. Guns are much better at what they are made for, killing and maiming, you ever actually try and kill with a rock.
as martial artist...I know how to kill with my hands

but I'm old and gray nowadays
not much of a stand-up, stand-ground kind of guy anymore

and knowing what it takes to down the bad guy......I will keep my gun

and knowing that shooting fish in a barrel
is like shooting people in confined quarters......

teachers should be armed
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Do all of you realize that the ArmiaLite Rifle Model 15 (AR-15) was never used by the US Military? Probably not. ArmiaLite sold the rights to Colt in 1959 who modified it and sold it to the US military as the M16 which went into production in 1969. However Colt did continue to use the AR-15 trademark as a semi-automatic only and marketed it to civilian and law enforcement.
 
Top