No. See my earlier post.Wouldn't that just make them useful idiots?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No. See my earlier post.Wouldn't that just make them useful idiots?
I completely disagree.Of course it does! How can anyone take a protest seriously if the participants don't have an in depth knowledge of what they are protesting?
Not at all. Why would you protest something if you don't have an understanding as to what that something is? I mean, am I wrong in that someone should understand what they are protesting? I don't understand the perspective of being ignorant on a topic and protesting it anyway.I completely disagree.
But are you being sarcastic here?
One can protest that an industry is poisoning the local water supply by effluents without understanding the chemical reactions that are causing it. Here people are protesting the rise in mass shootings in public places that target innocents, even children and the fact that the government has crafted no policy on reducing and preventing these. The demands are simple. Make laws that prevent such people from owning guns legally. Nothing else needs to be known at all.Not at all. Why would you protest something if you don't have an understanding as to what that something is? I mean, am I wrong in that someone should understand what they are protesting? I don't understand the perspective of being ignorant on a topic and protesting it anyway.
Some clarifications please: Where did you get the number 191? I know what a mass shooting is, but what is a “multiple mass shooting”? What is an “AR15 style”?Knowing that 191 innocent people died from multiple mass shootings involving AR15 style rifles since 2012 is probably more important than knowing the difference between a clip and a magazine.
And therein lies the problem, ie, eschewing other useful measures.The demands are simple. Make laws that prevent such people from owning guns legally. Nothing else needs to be known at all.
I disagree. The law makers are tasked to know the details and formulate effective laws, the citizens need only assess the results on the ground, and if found inadequate, push the lawmakers to do more.And therein lies the problem, ie, eschewing other useful measures.
Lack of understanding leads to simplistic demands & poor results.
Intelligent & thoughtful pushing is better than uninformed ranting.I disagree. The law makers are tasked to know the details and formulate effective laws, the citizens need only assess the results on the ground, and if found inadequate, push the lawmakers to do more.
No. I believe in specialization. Its the job of the mechanic to fix my car, it the job of the doctor to cure me, and its the job of the politician to formulate laws that protect me from mass shooters. If they fail in their jobs we protest, criticize and sack them like any other service provider .Intelligent & thoughtful pushing is better than uninformed ranting.
Do more what, exactly? That is the question that these students that I mentioned can't answer. If you ask them "What piece of legislation, specifically, do you disagree with?" They can't answer it because they don't know what it is or how it works. You cannot demand change without offering a reasonable alternative. These students can't do that so they can't demand anything in any legitimate capacity.I disagree. The law makers are tasked to know the details and formulate effective laws, the citizens need only assess the results on the ground, and if found inadequate, push the lawmakers to do more.
It isn't that simple.The demands are simple. Make laws that prevent such people from owning guns legally.
Some clarifications please: Where did you get the number 191?
I know what a mass shooting is, but what is a “multiple mass shooting”?
What is an “AR15 style”?
No its exactly that simple. Its not incumbent on me to tell the mechanic how to fix my car. Its their duty to it, so that it works again. Same here.Do more what, exactly? That is the question that these students that I mentioned can't answer. If you ask them "What piece of legislation, specifically, do you disagree with?" They can't answer it because they don't know what it is or how it works. You cannot demand change without offering a reasonable alternative. These students can't do that so they can't demand anything in any legitimate capacity.
It isn't that simple.
I admire your passion.No its exactly that simple. Its not incumbent on me to tell the mechanic how to fix my car. Its their duty to it, so that it works again. Same here.
Its the politicians job to figure out how to do it. They are the lawmakers. Get at it. Chop chop. They are responsible to bring out a set of laws on guns that will stop or lower mass shooting incidents. We will see how effective they actually are and vote them up in or out accordingly. Same with issues regarding employment , govt. debt, education etc. etc.
that wasn't the point.....If one kid shows up at one school with an AR15 and another kid shows up at another school with a rock, who will have the higher body count?
as martial artist...I know how to kill with my handsGun fanatics as per usual underestimate gun legislations ability to regulate the more deadly tools. Guns are much better at what they are made for, killing and maiming, you ever actually try and kill with a rock.
Wow.
In 1956, ArmaLite designed a lightweight assault rifle for military use and designated it the ArmaLite Rifle-15, or AR-15
What is an “AR15 style”?