Ben Masada
Well-Known Member
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Hi Oberon!
Thanks for your response. Ben seems to think that it was necessary for jesus to be married to be called a rabbi. You say it wasnt custom back then. I say it doesnt matter. Ok. so back then a man didnt have to be married to be called a rabbi. So Jesus did not have to get married to be called rabbi. Either way, whether he married or not makes no difference to being called a rabbi.
What then would a man have to do back then, to be called a rabbi? I suspect he would have to undergo some training. I dont think Jesus was into tradition, and would not have gone through a formal training course. It doesnt seem like everybody called him rabbi. Some people called him rabbi because that is what he was to them. But whether jesus was 'legally' a rabbi, either through marrying or getting training he wasnt too much bothered about it.
If it wasnt necessary for jesus to marry in order to be called a rabbi, then he could have married anyway. If it was necessary for jesus to get married to be called a rabbi, i dont think he would have married because it was tradition. I dont think jesus would have tied the knot just so that he would be considered a rabbi.
So to me, whatever Jesus did, get married or not, it had nothing to do with what others naturally considered him to be. Perhaps that was part of the reason the hypocrites hated him. He was teaching the word of god since he was a young boy, i dont think he considered it necessary to wait until he is married to teach.
It is worthy mentioning though, that after this wedding the whole ministry of jesus seemed to get off the ground.
Jesus never had any problem with the Jewish tradition. You are confusing the real Jesus of Nazareth with the Christ of Paul. Paul was the one who had a problem with
Jewish tradition.
Bem