Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Good point Charity. This Mary was not the sister of Martha and Lazarus.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.... and kick Ben in the pants...:cover:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Oberon,
Could a women have a change in name. Would it be possible that mary of behtany was later called mary of magdala? Or the other way around.
If jewish women could have a change in name, what would be the circumstances?
Noami which meant 'pleasantness' changed her name to Mara which meant 'bitterness'.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Heneni,
If you and oberon allow me, I could answer your question.
The two names of this one woman was not due to a name changing. Mary of Bethany
who had her busines in Magadala, became known as Mary Magdalene. When she met
Jesus and eventually fell in love with him, she decided to quit on her business and return home to Bethany, obviously when perspectives of a marriage with Jesus were
feasible. Due to the character of her business, and for being, let's say, a famous woman, the epitet Magdalene stuck to her name for life. Even the Gospel writers about 50 to 60 years after the fact would have of this Mary that she was Magdalene,
Jesus' beloved disciple.
These things usually happen. Think of Jesus being of Nazareth. Jesus the Nazarene,
when he was not born in Nazareth and lived perhaps only one third of his life in there. But the name stuck to Jesus perhaps because of his father who had his business in Nazareth all his life. I hope I was of some help.
Ben :clap
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++What was mary of magdala's business?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I was 101 percent sure that you would ask that question. That's why I lingered around for a while. I know what you are thinking, and the only thing I can say
is that you are correct. Now, for food to your thought, think of the following:
Mary was a well-to-do woman to even suppot finantially Jesus' group of the Twelve.
We all know that it was not from parental inheritance because she would also support her sister Martha and brother Lazarus. Martha would pay her way as a maiden-servant to Mary. Lazarus was always a sick man.
The text says that Jesus exorcized seven demons out of Mary, most probably
related to her business. God knows how long it took to Jesus to complete his
work of exorcism. At the end Mary was free of her demons but taken over by
Jesus, which was by the way her salvation to a new life. Albeit a life crowded
with sufferings, but a new life which gave her a new sense to her life. That's
why she would call him "Rabboni" which means Master of my sufferings. But sufferings as a result of genuine love. Not only spiritual but also romantic love.
Considering that when the light came to me about Mary's life she was already married to Jesus, I am going to forbid myself to go any further since Jesus himself would prefer to leave it alone. If you love Jesus, you will do the same.
Ben:sorry1:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++So you wont come out and say what it is what she did, is that because you are ashamed of jesus marrying a women of great reputation, or because your not quite sure?
If you care about what jesus thought, and you feel that this should rather be left alone, why did you start the thread ben?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++Will your friend be happy with the fact that jesus married a prostitute?
:sarcastic Or are you going to try and hide that small detail, which you are not entirely sure about.
What was mary of magdala's business?
Now, decipher the riddle.
Holy rusted metal, Batman!
Dunemeister is absolutely correct. The Ben Masada Heneni discussion exemplifies biblical discussion at its worst.
There were pretty women all in a row
Just to touch the hem of your robe
But you had no place to take them so
You could not take a wife
- Rich Mullins
I see zero difference ...Please cut Heneni some slack..I wouldnt lump her in with the likes of Ben..
++++++++++++++++++++++++Dunemeister is absolutely correct. The Ben Masada Heneni discussion exemplifies biblical discussion at its worst.