• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The witchhunt continues...

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Fine with me. People need to stop eating that crap and stop drinking ****ty beer like Bud Light, anyway. And if it makes Dylan go away, all the better. This is just another useless narcissistic loser who is famous for doing nothing at all, and makes money from advertising and brand partnerships. They make trans people look like a joke, and managed to **** off both trans people and cis women with their offensive "days of girlhood" videos, which were basically a misogynistic mockery of both trans women and natal women (Dylan was a gay boy until recently, and many gay men are misogynists). Screw 'em all.

Thank you! I think it's crucial to be able to make a distinction between one trans person and all trans people. Maybe I missed it, but I don't think the "trans community" voted for Dylan to be their representative.

In other words, being critical of Dylan says nothing about one's thoughts about any portion of the LGBTQ+ population.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
In what way, please? I mean, show me how "elitist condescension" is more damaging to human rights for minorities than religiously-inspired hatred for non-conformity.
Seriously?

I never implied that all rural people are rednecks. I refer to a subculture that's staunchly insular.
Clearly your reference to "the yokel hoard" was directed only against true Scotsmen. :rolleyes:
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
... for underestimating the douchebaggery of their customer base?
Money is green whomever it comes from. If they want to shoot themselves in the foot over 'ideals,' then maybe it's time to get out of business or the market will do it for them.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Money is green whomever it comes from. If they want to shoot themselves in the foot over 'ideals,' then maybe it's time to get out of business or the market will do it for them.
Ideals like equality and human decency? What if racists boycotted a company for having an endorsement deal with a black celebrity? Would you say the same thing?
 
Last edited:

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
It's Kellogg's fault if they lose money.

Not sure they will, at least long term. Bud Light was a unique situation, since it had the reputation of appealing to a specific demographic. Also, those who would have supported it were turned off by their response and the millions Anheuser-Busch donates to conservative groups. Also, it's not great beer.

The companies supporting transfolk now are betting on it being bragging rights long term.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Thank you! I think it's crucial to be able to make a distinction between one trans person and all trans people. Maybe I missed it, but I don't think the "trans community" voted for Dylan to be their representative.

In other words, being critical of Dylan says nothing about one's thoughts about any portion of the LGBTQ+ population.
Do you think that distinction makes any difference to the boycotters?
 

PureX

Veteran Member
I am all in favor of corporate boycotts. I encourage them and would happily participate in them.

... If they are meant to send corporate culture the message that we will not tolerate their unfettered greed.

But unfortunately that is not the message the Trump-bumpkins want to send. And so any possible effect of their boycott will be wasted. And the corporate greed will continue unchecked.
 
Top