McBell
Unbound
ROTFLMAOI'm not going to let you abuse my nature. I decline to answer your question.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
ROTFLMAOI'm not going to let you abuse my nature. I decline to answer your question.
ROTFLMAO
Running tail tucked like you did is hilarious.Troll.
Running tail tucked like you did is hilarious.
You even had the gall to claim it was all the other persons fault.
That you call ME the troll is even more icing on the cake.
If nothing else, you are a pretty sure bet for a good laugh.
Keep up the good work!
You do understand that I have to actually give a crickets fart about your opinion for your insults to actually be insulting, right?Okay, now your a canoe.
You do understand that I have to actually give a crickets fart about your opinion for your insults to actually be insulting, right?
I will give you the last word in this exchange.
Give me your best shot.
Mind the Forum Rules though.
I wont report you, but someone else may.
Define religiousThen why are posting on a religious forum if you arent religous?
Cosmological science also believed in several hundreds of years that the Newtonian "laws of celestial motions around a gravity center " was Universal - but they were wrong.Nope.
People believed the sun revolved around the earth. People believed you could turn lead into gold. People believed lightning was hurled by Thor. People believed you could cure some diseases by bleeding the person.
When Columbus landed in the Americas, he thought he landed in India. Millions of people believed Hillary Clinton would win the last presidential election. They all believed things which were wrong.
Cosmological science also believed in several hundreds of years that the Newtonian "laws of celestial motions around a gravity center " was Universal - but they were wrong.
I'm not going to let you abuse my nature. I decline to answer your question.
I guess a part of your nature is not to answer an easy question, then?
Because you protect a false definition of a thing. I don't agree with the definition of faith in God.
Cosmological science also believed in several hundreds of years that the Newtonian "laws of celestial motions around a gravity center " was Universal - but they were wrong.
"Wrong or incomplete in understanding" is the same to me in this matter. Scientists thought and believed that starry motions in galaxies were similar to the planetary motions in the Solar System: The nearer the Sun, the faster orbital motion - because of the gravitational thinking.They were not wrong...but simply incomplete in understanding. Which Newtonian laws do you see as overturned?
If your definition is not the Biblical definition, I would be interested in hearing it. Isn't the biblical definition of faith "believing with insufficient evidence"? I don't want to straw man you. I hope you clarify.
Faith in God is knowing that God is true, or having a personal relationship with God.