I JUST GAVE YOU THE VERSES.When does Qur'an say Sun orbits the Earth.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I JUST GAVE YOU THE VERSES.When does Qur'an say Sun orbits the Earth.
It is saying they travel in its own motion. The arabic word used here is Yasbahoon derived from the arabic word sabaha which describes the motion of a moving body.click the link. the verses are specified there (with interpretation).
https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Geocentrism_and_the_Quran#Primary_Evidence
e.g. Quran, 21:33 And He it is Who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. They all float in rounded courses.
if "they" refers to the sun and the moon, they "float" round the earth.
Those verses prove nothing, you are making misconceptions.I JUST GAVE YOU THE VERSES.
Never does the Qur'an say the Sun floats around the Earth...If you want to get technical the Sun orbits the Milky Way,but it certainly doesn't float around Earth.
It never gives justification for murder, the context is different.Why exactly is this thread for?
You are not going to admit the faults of the Quran and continue giving justifications for murder, death and violence the Quran begs.
If someone brings those verses forth, they are either not true Muslims or it's in the wrong context.
Or even has a wrong Quran.
You surely can't be that bored to start a trolling thread to keep you occupied.
It's an endless discussion of reasoning and denial of anything wrong though there are many.
How am i twisting scripture, that is exactly what you are doing to try and give an error in the Qur'an.Jabar, just NO . . . you are doing what all the Apologists do, twisting scripture into the definition necessary to justify something objectively inaccurate. If only religious zealots as yourself would admit, that their scriptures are nothing more than metaphorical essays outlining that religion's tenets, then I for one would have nothing to refute as I believe we are all entitled to our subjective universes. But the moment when a Faith declares itself objectively true . . . it's time to get the shovel.
You have YET to address my glaring ERRORS . . . until then consider our conversation null and voidHow am i twisting scripture, that is exactly what you are doing to try and give an error in the Qur'an.
Well of course you will not believe that it is divine because you continuously misunderstand the Qur'an and make misconceptions.
Tell me exactly what i twisted.
What errors? I had like 3 people talking to meYou have YET to address my glaring ERRORS . . . until then consider our conversation null and void
Abdullah Yusuf ‘Ali in his introduction to Sura 17 states: "It [Sura 17] opens with the night journey of the Holy Prophet [Mohammed]: he was transported from the sacred mosque (of Makkah) to the Farthest Mosque (of Jerusalem) in a night and shown some of the Signs of Allah.
Boom . . . the Quran is in error, time to convert Jabar
I would agree, mosque is not what he is defining it as, it is just a place of prostrating.The Quran really doesn't say this though. The night journey is from hadith and probably a later back projection onto the Quran.
You are quoting exegesis, which is not the Quran [also anything in brackets isn't in the Quran btw], and seeing as 'mosque' doesn't mean what you think it does it is not the smoking gun you think it is.
See post #67 as for why the verse possibly/probably isn't even referring to Muhammed.
Sorry, but this argument is just wrong, even from a non-Muslim perspective.
It does not matter, why don't you just check that video out.Oh my God, Zakir Naik Now I know this thread has gone down the toilet.
So essentially you are saying what plenty of other Apologists say . . . that a religion's authority (in this case Abdullah Yusuf ‘Ali) don't understand their own religion either?The Quran really doesn't say this though. The night journey is from hadith and probably a later back projection onto the Quran.
You are quoting exegesis, which is not the Quran [also anything in brackets isn't in the Quran btw], and seeing as 'mosque' doesn't mean what you think it does it is not the smoking gun you think it is.
See post #67 as for why the verse possibly/probably isn't even referring to Muhammed.
Sorry, but this argument is just wrong, even from a non-Muslim perspective.