Rather it is you that refuses to see the disconnect between a dictionary and two translations by the same author of the dictionary that does not support your claims. It is a blatant contradiction which shows your claim is false. After all I am not the one ignoring that same author does not translation his own English versions of the Quran that match your claims. I am the one point it out....
You have provided zero sources. You pasted pictures which do not show the name of the text, the author, the page number. The one source you mentioned, not referenced, does not agree at all as I have shown previously. You simple copied and pasted pictures from an apologist sites, nothing more. When you can actually supply sources which are not contradictions to your views then talk about logic. When you can actually link proper citations not merely pictures with no information regarding the source then we can talk about evidence and sources. Your claims still have zero merit as you have nothing to support your claims beside fallacious arguments and hand waving. If you know anything about logic you would know what a contradiction is and out of context fallacies are. You would see the contradiction between the same authors work. You wouldn't use both as premises of your claims.
Try again son. Maybe enroll in a course to teach you how to make proper references or even how to make proper links to the work not pictures. Maybe a course on language to teach you how nouns modify verbs and how one context can not be injected into another.
Let me tell you something mate.
1. Again and again I said that I did not quote Ghulam Farids dictionary for any other reason than to give you a dictionary easy to read. But even his dictionary I quoted to you later because you kept talking about it so much.
2. You claimed that Edward lane says that when it comes to a person Laraba will mean physical beating, you never supported that claim. Because you cannot. Do you even know that we dont really take even Edward Lanes Lexicon for anything more than a study after the letter Qaf? Lexicons we study throughout. And the violent rendering of the said word is when its a violent environment like a war. And the usage of the word is not cited in the lexicon, its Ilribuhunna which personality is not mentioned in any lexicon. Now how could one explain this to such an arrogant person like you? Try and support your claim that Edward Lanes Lexicon cites only the violent rendering of the word when it comes to a human being or person. Show me.
3. You keep quoting the translation which I say is wrong with evidence from language and Quranic context. And I am not the only scholar who does this kind of work. I can quote many but we generally don't do that unless its a public debate published work. Generally out of respect but there is no rule.
4. You keep using words like tripe, etc.
5. You just claimed that the pictures I posted are from some apologist site and that I did not give the authors name. Check again, I have given the authors names. If you wanted to know the source you can just ask like a gentleman rather than saying things like this. Those are screen shots of Ghulams dictionary and Edward Lanes Lexicon. Look up Laraba. I even quoted the English transliteration for ease.
6. Very mature of you to call me son. And yes, I will enroll in a course. Lol.
And stand by your word, if you can prove that I have taken the pictures from a site, any site, apologist or not, I will post a Video online with a public apology and share the link here. But now that you have said it, prove it.
Peace.
