• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

There is more then enough evidence to prove God exists.

adi2d

Active Member
What about the children? That these individuals decided to sell themselves into servitude with the consequences being that their children will be servants as well is no different, in principle, to you choosing what school to send your children to or what TV programs they should watch. How is that a reflection on God, who gave to all men the freedom to act for themselves. This statement is a non sequitur. It is meaningless in the context of this argument.


I don't believe even you believe what you wrote.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
Yes. I know of no scripture that says this so I would be interested to read it.

Are you kidding me dude? We've been talking about the same scripture the pages now. You very well know what one I am referring to.
 

Serenity7855

Lambaster of the Angry Anti-Theists
What of the kids freedom?

Children do not have absolute freedom. Parents are responsible for them. If the parents mess up you cannot blame God for not telling you. It is the individuals responsibility to make informed choices for their children, not Gods. He cannot be held accountable for their decision, no more so then the theif.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
God made it moral or at least made o
It not immoral to do so.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
Or the wife's freedom. And you still haven't responded to the fact that these times e only protect Hebrew men, not
Out siders and woman.
 
Last edited:

Serenity7855

Lambaster of the Angry Anti-Theists
Or the wife's freedom. And you still haven't responded to the fact that these times e only protect Hebrew men, not pushes
Out siders and woman.

I do not have an answer for that. I am not concerned with the servitude, I am defending the accusation that God condones slavery. He doesn't
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
I do not have an answer for that. I am not concerned with the servitude, I am defending the accusation that God condones slavery. He doesn't
when you no options and rights it stops being servitude and is slavery.
 

Serenity7855

Lambaster of the Angry Anti-Theists
when you no options and rights it stops being servitude and is slavery.

Well, I would agree with that, however, these particular people, that Moses referred to, volunteered. They had an option and the rights were being disclosed in these rules for servants
 

adi2d

Active Member
Well, I would agree with that, however, these particular people, that Moses referred to, volunteered. They had an option and the rights were being disclosed in these rules for servants

The wife and children were not volunteers! The children were born property of the master. No matter how you tapdance around it that is slavery by definition
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
The wife and children were not volunteers! The children were born property of the master. No matter how you tapdance around it that is slavery by definition

Or foreigners caught in war.
 

Serenity7855

Lambaster of the Angry Anti-Theists
The wife and children were not volunteers! The children were born property of the master. No matter how you tapdance around it that is slavery by definition

Have you read these five verses? Are you reading Exodus 21:2-6? Only what you are saying does not match that which has been written. The children came under the same laws as their parents, a seven year contract. Of course the children or the wife given whilst in servitude would remain the servants of the master after the man did his seven years. They were still under their seven year contract. I thought that was a given. Why would they set free the man and keep the woman forever? You are painting the Masters in an unsavoury light, we do not know that. That is pure conjecture and intended to taunt Christians rather then have honest debate.
 
Top