I don't care how many vote no. You're all
blind!
I know it's cliche "just look around" but that's literally it.
Every day, something is getting born. Something is growing. Human beings do not have the capacity with all of their science to make something that lives, grows, and evolves. Even if we did, the question of who did it first would immediately spring to mind. So, you can say all you want but:
- Science cannot make a single living thing. It can only make hybrids.
- Even if you say, did abiogenesis in a lab. That's life, created, in a lab. The whole premise proves, not disproves causal life. This by definition has a creator, just as you had to work to make it in a lab. Suddenly declaring what you spent hours or days (or weeks or years on) as without author would likely be enough to make you quit, and sue for lack of credit.
- But suppose you say that such arose randomly. Alrighty, then. Let's put monkeys in a room and surely they'll produce Shakespeare. But wait, no they won't because we're going to take away their tools like all pens, ink, typewriters (supposedly the atheist conception of creation happened before laws of science, so there are no forces of motion). And we'll take away the medium to write on, like paper (they also say there was nothing there at the time) and while we're at it, we'll take away the table and the workplace (no time or space either, nothing, remember). But we still have monkeys, even though we now have no typewriters, workplace, or tools. Right? Wrong. Remember, no creator. The monkeys are all fired. Unions protested because of unfair working conditions. You now have nobody working, at random, without any tools or workspace. Seriously, good luck.
Evolution is not, nor shall it ever be, mutually exclusive with the idea of a deity.