When you say something is limited/imperfect you must have some idea of limitless/perfect. Where is this idea from?
Say what you want to say.
"My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust.
There are other reasons not to believe in God(s). But it is right, an omnipotent god, who can make anything, is unjust. However a limited being, like the Sumerians and many other polytheists believed, would not be, because he has certain limits, like that we can't all live forever or else too many resources would be taken up. Jesus says there would be a bunch of immortal people but not only would there be boulders no matter where you went he also said his disciples wouldn't die, and the proud christian declares they died for him!
The Bible states Mathew 16:28 "Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom." “
Besides this Jesus had to die to forgive sins, right? No! According to his divinely inspired word.
Mark 2:5 “When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralyzed man, ‘Son, your sins are forgiven.’“
Sins were forgiven before Jesus died nullifying the idea that Jesus had to die to forgive sins.
But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such a violent reaction against it?... Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. But if i did that, then my argument against God collapsed too--for the argument depended on saying the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my fancies. Thus, in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist - in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless - I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality - namely my idea of justice - was full of sense. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never have known it was dark. Dark would be without meaning." (C. S. Lewis)
God does not exist. He was a lie by a rogue pharaoh, Akhenaten, to take away the balance of power in Ancient Egypt during the Amarna period. Quite like Trump now, not to stir that pot.
This is why panentheistic polytheism is true. It's the new deism. The sun, earth, moon, stars, verbs etc all exist. They all cocreates reality with the great Monality, nothingness, which includes everything as everything is made of mostly nothing and what something there is is contorted nothingness. And all these stars, moons, humans, animals, planets, geology cosmology is made of the same stuff, nothing. Gods compose God, which the polytheist, counter to what bad actors had made seem different, was the Egyptian religion. Atum, the supreme god was composed by the gods, they were his attributes. We are all the cells of the living god, reality.