oldbadger
Skanky Old Mongrel!
Like guns cars kill too. Just making comparisons.
How many 'car' mass murders have occurred at US schools?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Like guns cars kill too. Just making comparisons.
.
For that matter, the period of time when I kept a weapon at home was in response to a home invasion that I fortunately survived. .
Lol, that gave me a funny mental image.How many 'car' mass murders have occurred at US schools?
Again. Clearly state the problem. Some guns go their entire lives without being shot. Obviously guns alone do not cause the problem.Obviously if someone is getting shot, the gun is the immediate problem.
Totally agree.
There is a law of unintendec consequences ...
What would the carzies turn to if deprived of guns?
Something way worse?
Not many, but here is one from 2001:How many 'car' mass murders have occurred at US schools?
The chain saw and the butcher-knife are specifically designed to be
very efficient at disassembling organic things. Accidents, and the occasional
murder are inevitable. Explicitely designed to cause injury?
Yes and no. The nuclear bomb is designed to be able to kill.
Its actual use is something quite different.
A gun in defensive use is used far more often to prevent than to cause injury.
The car is de(signed to go very fast, which is inherently dangerous.
Accidents are inevitable. You get suicide, sometimes murder. Secondary
effects, where a knife is exactly for slicing flesh, the primary function.
The distinctions that might be made between primary and secondary
properties is academic, really.
We wont outlaw cars to prevent murder or suicide, nor accidents.
To outlaw guns to prevent suicide would be pretty ridiculous.
In Hong Kong, preferred metod is to step off the balcony.
Cant outlaw those. There is always a way.
FWIW, I was looking down from 17th floor in HK. I was going to kill
myself over something that happened in the USA. Something I could
have avoided if I'd had any means of defending myself.
This is all a bit disconnected, sorry, I am cooking and doing three things
at once.
Im sure you can find the sense in it tho. Right?
Obviously you need a person to pull the trigger but a gun certainly makes killing a lot easier than without.Again. Clearly state the problem. Some guns go their entire lives without being shot. Obviously guns alone do not cause the problem.
And as they mature, they become the people they now rail against.It looks as if millions of US school children do not agree with you. They'll have the vote very soon.
Sure. That wasn't the point. The point was, as I said, guns are not necessarily the problem. I am not saying that they are not (even though I believe they are not). I am suggesting that it is surprising to me that you conclude so easily that they are.Obviously you need a person to pull the trigger but a gun certainly makes killing a lot easier than without.
What "Home invading types."?
I don't know. I am not sure what that has to do with the price of tea in China either. However you asked, I knew of at least one. So I figured, hey maybe people think they do not occur. Earlier a poster suggested that vehicular homocides was virtually nonexistent.Yes........ we had a ram-raid attack in Gravesend last week.
But how many school murders have taken place since 2001? Hmmm?
What's mature about living in paranoia, clinging to a gun in bed?And as they mature, they become the people they now rail against.
Geeze, Louise....are all you anti-gun types living in a world of self-serving stereotypes?What's mature about living in paranoia, clinging to a gun in bed?
How many 'car' mass murders have occurred at US schools?
I'm not sure how simple logic is surprising. A person bent on murder is going to be able to kill a lot more people with a gun and especially with a semi-automatic rifle like an AR-15 than they are with a knife, car or whatever else. Do you think Stephen Paddock would've been able to mow down 58 people if he had a bolt-action rifle and not an arsenal of legal assault weapons, high capacity mags and bump stocks?Sure. That wasn't the point. The point was, as I said, guns are not necessarily the problem. I am not saying that they are not (even though I believe they are not). I am suggesting that it is surprising to me that you conclude so easily that they are.
Not that I've ever needed a gun to deal with, no. I doubt you do either.
Oh, you knew about a car attack in 2001, but you're not quite sure about all the mass school shootings since?I don't know. I am not sure what that has to do with the price of tea in China either. However you asked, I knew of at least one. So I figured, hey maybe people think they do not occur. Earlier a poster suggested that vehicular homocides was virtually nonexistent.
Most recent attempt in the news is here and it's not even in the US!
I'm sure France has a good car policy in consideration given that gun policies are in place already...
Car slams into crowd of people outside school in Toulouse