Those who believe there is no God live by faith

[Dan From Smithville]

Sorry all late my time, @Polymath257 will respond in detail latter after I am rested. I am sure I have already responded to alot of your post content already in earlier posts though. Good night to everyone talk latter

You take care. We can return to the current business when you get back. If I am busy, I am certain others would like to know your thoughts on the flawless nature of your words.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I suggest you read what I posted. It is in realtion to the amount of people around the would 1/3 of the worlds population claiming to be christian. I never said all of these people are genuine christians and also stated in other posts not everyone of them have had an experience with God but it is not for me to judge who has and who has not.

So really, the "1/3 of the population" is an irrelevant number to cite then, since you don't know how many of those are "True Christiams (tm)" and how many of those "True Christians" had genuine experiences...

 

[Ayjaydee]

You take care. We can return to the current business when you get back. If I am busy, I am certain others would like to know your thoughts on the flawless nature of your words.

Not me

 

[3rdAngel]

Goodness, you are not answering my question and do everything you can to avoid answering it.

I am asking questions. That you are avoiding is not unsubstantiated. It is here for all to see.

is there no possibility that you could be wrong in your responses to the many points made by others on here? You shot everything down. You made lots of claims. Are you suggesting that everything you posted was flawless and without error?

Nonsense, Dan try reading post # 1093 and follow the link back to an earlier post and please tell me how I have not anwered your question already some time ago now?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Well Dan seems like I am correct. Your not reading my posts to you are you. Anyhow I will link them to you latter after I am rested. To tired to find them for you now.

I said you were wrong. But now you claim to know what I am reading and what I am not.

No need to bother. All you need to do is answer my question. You know the question you are avoiding.

 

[Ayjaydee]

So really, the "1/3 of the population" is an irrelevant number to cite then, since you don't know how many of those are "True Christiams (tm)" and how many of those "True Christians" had genuine experiences...

He actually said that many had an experience with god and knows no one would plough thru 50+ pages of this stuff to find it. Lol

 

[Polymath257]

I think we have discussed this earlier Poly I did respond to a lot of these points in an earlier post to you. Did you get a chance to read it? I am happy to respond to this one in detail if you like.

Please do. This is a fast developing thread and I must have missed your post on this topic.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Nonsense, Dan try reading post # 1093 and follow the link back to an earlier post and please tell me how I have not anwered your question already some time ago now?

Answer it again. It should be easy. No need to jump around. The question isn't difficult. Are your words to everyone here perfect, without the possibility of any error on your part?

 

[3rdAngel]

Please do. This is a fast developing thread and I must have missed your post on this topic.

Yes I am sure I responded to a post like this from you earlier today my time. I am finding this thread hard to keep up with we well. Anyhow goodnight will try catch up more latter.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

You mean like the ones I asked you yesterday in regards to the scriptures I posted to you asking you what you think they mean? I am happy to discuss your questions if you want to discuss mine as well. A discussion goes two ways do you not agree? See post 1087 already answered yours. How about you answer mine?

I read this post. Now you are holding a response to my question hostage if I don't follow your demands. I have to tell you, that doesn't seem very Christian.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Yes I am sure I responded to a post like this from you earlier today my time. I am finding this thread hard to keep up with we well. Anyhow goodnight will try catch up more latter.

I noticed that you seem to have run into some difficulty here. I wonder what it is?

 

[3rdAngel]

Answer it again. It should be easy. No need to jump around. The question isn't difficult. Are your words to everyone here perfect, without the possibility of any error on your part?

Dan you have the links there to where I answered your question directly if your not going to read my posts that already answer your questions I am not going to keep on repeating myself to you. If you do not like my answer and you feel I have not addressed it adequately please state why if not we can talk more about it latter. Good night

 

[3rdAngel]

I read this post. Now you are holding a response to my question hostage if I don't follow your demands. I have to tell you, that doesn't seem very Christian.

Goodness, you only part read my post. Read the link in it that goes to the post that answers your question directly

3rdAngel said: ↑ ... See post 1087 already answered yours. How about you answer mine?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Dan you have the links there to where I answered your question directly if your not going to read my posts that already answer your questions I am not going to keep on repeating myself to you. If you do not like my answer and you feel I have not addressed it adequately please state why if not we can talk more about it latter. Good night

You have my question. If you cannot provide an honest answer, just say so.

I could not find that direct answer there or elsewhere, please be so kind to repeat your answer.

 

[3rdAngel]

You have my question. If you cannot provide an honest answer, just say so. I could not find that direct answer there or elsewhere, please be so kind to repeat your answer.

Serious Dan? You could not follow the link to post # 1087 which says..

Dan From Smithville said: ↑ So you think that there no possibility for you to be wrong here?

responded with...

3rdAngel said: I believe if I am wrong in anything I have posted here God will let me know and I will acknowledge it. Now you prove to me what I have posted wrong in your view Dan and lets discuss it in detail

How does this not answer your question? I will leave that with you to think about. I will have to get some rest now. Hope to catch up latter.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Goodness, you only part read my post. Read the link in it that goes to the post that answers your question directly

3rdAngel said: ↑ ... See post 1087 already answered yours. How about you answer mine?

You didn't answer my question. You diverted from answering it.

I can't imagine you writing everything you have here and not have an answer for the question. Being right in every exchange you have had is uncanny. If you are honest as you claim, you should be able to answer that without dodging or hostage taking.

 

[Ayjaydee]

Serious Dan? You could not follow the link to post # 1087 which says..

responded with...

How does this not answer your question? I will leave that with you to think about. I will have to get some rest now. Hope to catch up latter.

So has he let you know yet?

 

[3rdAngel]

Ok @Everyone really have to go now very tired. Goodnight my time thanks for the discussions.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Serious Dan? You could not follow the link to post # 1087 which says..

responded with...

How does this not answer your question? I will leave that with you to think about. I will have to get some rest now. Hope to catch up latter.

It doesn't say anything about whether you were absolutely correct in your answers. It defers response. It is a dodge.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Ok @Everyone really have to go now very tired. Goodnight my time thanks for the discussions.

Why are you posting to @Everyone? That person hasn't posted since 2011.

You think about an answer to my question. If you forget, I will be happy to remind you.