ratikala
Istha gosthi
Many I tend to cross reference them I find each acharyas comentaries very interesting , ...but on a daily basis mostly ......Bhagavad Gita as it is , ....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Just as Christ said "follow me", I feel that Krishna meant when he said worship me, to worship the Source of all, and again whatever name or label you want to use for the Source, it was the Source animating through Krishna that people were drawn to, take away the Source that animated through Krishna and all you have is an ordinary man. I must correct myself here, the ordinary man is also animating the Source, but because he isn't Self Realized, the Source doesn't shine through, his ignorance is like a dark cloud hiding the Source.namaskaram ji
prabhu ji , ..I think you have missed the entire purport of the Gita , ....there is nothing which is not contained within Krsna , therefore one canot go beyond that which encompases all , ....it is not about clinging or labels it is about true knowledge , ....yes by all means use the name chant it , eventualy you will come to knowledge of its true nature ,
ch 10 , ..v 8 , ....I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds. Everything emanates from Me. The wise who know this perfectly engage in My devotional service and worship Me with all their hearts
if you think that Krsna points to a great vacious beyond devoid of form you have missed something in which case please read the Gita again , and if this is so please explain why Krsna says ''worship me and you will come to me '' ?
Ch ..18 V ..65 , ....Always think of Me and become My devotee. Worship Me and offer your homage unto Me. Thus you will come to Me without fail. I promise you this because you are My very dear friend.
.
That source is Brahman. Krishna is just one of many of the Lord's forms.Just as Christ said "follow me", I feel that Krishna meant when he said worship me, to worship the Source of all, and again whatever name or label you want to use for the Source, it was the Source animating through Krishna that people were drawn to, take away the Source that animated through Krishna and all you have is an ordinary man. I must correct myself here, the ordinary man is also animating the Source, but because he isn't Self Realized, the Source doesn't shine through, his ignorance is like a dark cloud hiding the Source.
Yes Brahman is another label, and Krishna is a reflection of that Brahman.That source is Brahman. Krishna is just one of many of the Lord's forms.
Never noticed that (because I use Krishna.com Gita). However, I do my own translation with the word meanings provided (and that way avoid the Prabhupada hyperbole).Commentaries from all the 4 Vaishnava sampradayas.
For an advaitist Krishna is Brahman like everything else in the universe.Yes Brahman is another label, and Krishna is a reflection of that Brahman.
Many I tend to cross reference them I find each acharyas comentaries very interesting , ...but on a daily basis mostly ......Bhagavad Gita as it is , ....
Well what can I say, this post is wrong on so many levels.Just as Christ said "follow me", I feel that Krishna meant when he said worship me, to worship the Source of all, and again whatever name or label you want to use for the Source, it was the Source animating through Krishna that people were drawn to, take away the Source that animated through Krishna and all you have is an ordinary man. I must correct myself here, the ordinary man is also animating the Source, but because he isn't Self Realized, the Source doesn't shine through, his ignorance is like a dark cloud hiding the Source.
That's fine, its only what comes to me at the time, its what I see, which is after all the most important thing, if we cannot be true to ourselves, we cannot be true to anyone.Well what can I say, this post is wrong on so many levels.
@ratikala ji u are absolutely right...Sri Krushna is supreme brahman...doubt on terese part is also understandable as generally gurus give only nArAyaNa mantram not Krushna nor rAma mantram but that is only due to limited meaning exhibited by the names but yes Sri Krushna is supreme paramaatma and he has same qualities as the nArAyaNa tattwam(nArAyaNa is not a he/she/it it is what we refer as tattwam) and Sri Krushna is called pari poorna avatar meaning completely fullnamaskaram ji
prabhu ji , ..I think you have missed the entire purport of the Gita , ....there is nothing which is not contained within Krsna , therefore one canot go beyond that which encompases all , ....it is not about clinging or labels it is about true knowledge , ....yes by all means use the name chant it , eventualy you will come to knowledge of its true nature ,
ch 10 , ..v 8 , ....I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds. Everything emanates from Me. The wise who know this perfectly engage in My devotional service and worship Me with all their hearts
if you think that Krsna points to a great vacious beyond devoid of form you have missed something in which case please read the Gita again , and if this is so please explain why Krsna says ''worship me and you will come to me '' ?
Ch ..18 V ..65 , ....Always think of Me and become My devotee. Worship Me and offer your homage unto Me. Thus you will come to Me without fail. I promise you this because you are My very dear friend.
.
It is your opinion man..I myself isn't a Hindu, but I do love the philosophy of Hinduism, I am sorry if I am polluting your thread, I will leave if you want me to ?.
Yes you are right, like all of us have an a opinion, for who can really understand that which is beyond knowledge ?.It is your opinion man..
Beautiful, I wish I was born an Indian, its where I belong, maybe in my last life I was an Indian ?.#For Sri Vaishnavas who read this in a future time
Maha Vishnu exists in 5 types.
1. Paramapadam ( eternal non destructible realm where only muktas or only who are liberated reach.
2. In Milky ocean before brahma realm in this materialistic realm but only other devathas can reach...This is the place where devas like indra and nArada go asking for Maha Vishnu help from time to time.
3. He comes as avataras to lift the jIvas who are attached to temporary materialistic pleasures to help them in achieving eternal places and he has infinite avataras rose out his extreme compassion for jIvas as they forgot their true nature and running after temporary things.
4. He exists as antaryami that he exists in each and every particle in the universe making the forms not to collapse and giving them certain attributes...so he exists in your body and even in ants body but he will not get affected by your karmas( 4th chapter BG...NaMam karmani limpanthi) in a subtle form and hence body is called temple...
5. He exists in archa avatara in a deity form and is equally powerful as Sri Maha Vishnu in paramapadam...So if one worships near deity, dont think as deity is not talking or moving it is not listening or seeing..Vishnu does not need eyes to see or ears to hear or tongue to talk but for them to work he has to be behind them making them to work!
Krushna himself said that in this age of kali yuga he will not come as moving form like rAma but appear as archa moorthi in a deity form that we can decorate and worship ans he can grant even liberation from there...he says whatever form one makes like with a mud or wood or paper or gold or anything according to ones energy to worship him, he comes there and makes that form as him...so if one makes a vishnu form with mud, Vishnu takes that form and he can grant you anything from that little form itself..Not talking is a rule by a deity is a rule ordained by Vishnu himself...i think around 10 years back in india there were some reports like deities are talking or something coming out of deities, well then you can call bluff and indeed a bad sign.
He is complete with all guNas( qualities ) in all these 5 forms as said by vedas
ॐ पूर्णमदः पूर्णमिदं पूर्णात्पुर्णमुदच्यते
पूर्णश्य पूर्णमादाय पूर्णमेवावशिष्यते ॥
ॐ शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः ॥
Om Puurnnam-Adah Puurnnam-Idam Puurnnaat-Purnnam-Udacyate
Puurnnashya Puurnnam-Aadaaya Puurnnam-Eva-Avashissyate ||
Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih ||
Adiyen Chinna Jeeyar Swamy daasa
So which form is supreme then? Vishnu or Krishna? I have seen Gaudiya artwork that depict Krishna as higher than Vishnu.@ratikala ji u are absolutely right...Sri Krushna is supreme brahman...doubt on terese part is also understandable as generally gurus give only nArAyaNa mantram not Krushna nor rAma mantram but that is only due to limited meaning exhibited by the names but yes Sri Krushna is supreme paramaatma and he has same qualities as the nArAyaNa tattwam(nArAyaNa is not a he/she/it it is what we refer as tattwam) and Sri Krushna is called pari poorna avatar meaning completely full
I myself isn't a Hindu, but I do love the philosophy of Hinduism, I am sorry if I am polluting your thread, I will leave if you want me to ?.
Yes Vishnu is definitely higher than Krushna that sense..Iskcon has a wrong view saying that Sri Krushna is the origin of universe, yes that is correct in informal sense as nArAyaNa is vishnu who incarnated as Krushna, transitively you can say that but Iskcon says Krushna is the origin in literal sense, that is wrong and vedas dont accept it , vedas say nArAyaNa is only origin of entire universe..so you are correct in that sense but Krushna has same powers and qualities as nArAyaNa tattwam and is complete in that regard. In a way you are correct as nArAyaNa is start and Krushna came after. I am also in learning phaseSo which form is supreme then? Vishnu or Krishna? I have seen Gaudiya artwork that depict Krishna as higher than Vishnu.