Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Greetings rstrats and everyone,Shalom rstrats, I will go ahead and let you keep this thread on topic, as you desire, but I would like to address Luke 24:21 before I leave.
Luke 24:21 appears to be a slam dunk in saying that Sunday was the third day, but it is far from that. The translators basically had a bias in translating this verse to follow their preconceived idea that Sunday was the third day. Sunday was not the third day, but rather the fourth day, and it is very easy to see once it has been expounded to you. It all hinges on the Greek word G71 (ago) that the translators ignored, and inserted an "is" instead of what this word truly means, "to lead away."
Here is that same word used by Luke in the previous chapter:
When Luke 24:21 is properly translated, it should be rendered thusly:
These two disciples were downcast, they were sad because THAT DAY was LEADING AWAY the third day, the third day had already come and gone as that Sunday (today) was leading the third day away (the previous day, the Sabbath). If they were saying that "today IS the third day," why be so sad, as there was yet time for their hope to come true?
So rstrats, don't let the mistranslation of Luke 24:21 keep you from properly understanding three days and three nights. Blessings in The Name, ImAHebrew.
Here are four instances that I found in the Talmud.Whenever the three days and three nights of Matthew 12:40 is brought up in a "discussion" with 6th day crucifixion folks, they frequently argue that it is a Jewish idiom for counting any part of a day as a whole day. I wonder if anyone has documentation that shows that the phrase "x" days and "x"nights was ever used in the first century or before when it didnt include at least parts of the "x" days and at least parts of the "x" nights?
...A note fell from Heaven in Pumbeditha, 'Rabbah bar Nahmani is requested above (ie. he's dead)'. Abaye and Rava and all the Rabbis went out to toil in him (ie. bury). But they didn't know his whereabouts.They saw birds flying around and standing. They said, "It must be that he is here." They eulogized him for three days and three nights. A note fell, 'Anyone who leaves, shall be in excommunication.' They eulogized him for seven days. A note fell, 'Go to your houses in peace.'...
...And Rabbah bar bar Hanna said, 'One time, we were going by ship and the ship sailed between one fin and the other fin of the fish for three days and three nights. It was going up [river] and we were going down...
...He that destroyed the Temple, and he ruined the Sanctuary and he killed all the righteous and he exiled Israel from their land and he is still dancing among us. You only gave him to us in order to be rewarded. We do not want him and we do not want his reward. A note fell to them from Heaven that was written on it, 'Truth'... They sat in fasting for three days and three nights. He was given to them. He came out like a fiery cub from the house of the Holy of Holies...
...Rav Assi said, 'Three hundred thousand [with] drawn swords went up to Tur Malka (name of place) and killed there for three days and three nights. And on the other side was feasting and holiday. And this side did not know about that side...
Sorry, I was trying to say that "three days and three nights" does seem to mean an actual "three days and three nights." There is a concept of "partial days" counting as entire days. But when discussing that, the actual phrase "partial day" is used, not some idiom.Tumah,
I'm afraid I don't see where your quotes show that at least a portion of each one of the three daytimes and/or at least a portion of each one of the three night times couldn't have been involved.
Whenever the three days and three nights of Matthew 12:40 is brought up in a "discussion" with 6th day crucifixion folks, they frequently argue that it is a Jewish idiom for counting any part of a day as a whole day. I wonder if anyone has documentation that shows that the phrase "x" days and "x"nights was ever used in the first century or before when it didnt include at least parts of the "x" days and at least parts of the "x" nights?
I think he is including the other stages of self realization, whereas you seem to be focused on three. That's how I read it, anyway.Unification,
re: "There are 7 phases, or periods in which a temple(brain/mind) is destroyed and rebuilt... The sixth phase the ego is crucified at the place of the skull, the seventh phase, the resurrection occurs internally and the conscious and subconscious mind integrate into one."
Huh?