We can know that the god of Judeo-Christian scripture cannot exist as described because it is described as simultaneously having mutually exclusive qualities, such as being perfect, yet also making mistakes and regretting them:
[1] "As for Jehovah, his way is perfect - 2 Samuel 22:31
[2] "As for God, his way is perfect: The LORD's word is flawless; he shields all who take refuge in him." Psalm 18:30
[3] "His work is perfect, for all his ways are just. A trustworthy God who does no wrong, he is righteous and straight." - Deuteronomy 32:4
[4] "Be therefore perfect, even as your heavenly Father is perfect" - Matt 5:48
yet
[5] "And the LORD was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart." - Genesis 6:6
Doesn't sound too perfect to me.
Jehovah "also making mistakes and regretting them"?
Wait a minute....does the Bible say God regretted His mistakes? No, it says that God regretted the choices men were making!
Yes, His work is perfect....A&E were given a temptation, and possessing the ability of free will, they chose their own course: stealing from the tree that belonged to Jehovah.
The solution was also imperfect - drowning most terrestrial life for the sins of man, and starting over again using the same breeding stock. Guess what? It's the same sinful human race with all of the same warts and scars - greed, deception, theft, violence, etc.. Yet He is said to be perfect anyway.
The god described does not exist because it cannot. Actual gods would have to be either perfect or imperfect, but not both - at least not in the same sense at the same time.
It's the old married bachelor thing. By definition, no such thing exists or could exist, again assuming that we mean married and bachelor in the same sense at the same time, where bachelor means a never-been-married man.. One could be a married bachelor of arts.
This isn't to say that no gods exist, just that if they do, they don't violate the Law of Noncontradiction. We can't rule out the possibility of gods existing, but we can rule out the logically impossible ones.
Once, when having this discussion in the past, I was told that just because there are errors in the description of Jehovah, it doesn't mean He doesn't exist. I thought that that was odd. It would be like saying that married bachelors exist if you fix the error that the bachelor is married or that the married guy is still a bachelor.
There are many other examples of contradictory and mutually exclusive features of Jehovah, such as granting free will while being omniscient, or existing out of time but still acting such as creating man, and act that requires that there be a human-free before state and a post-creation state featuring humanity. It's one or the other in both cases, but not both simultaneously.
Well, since what you said 'God regretted His mistakes' has been revealed to be in error, maybe the rest of your interpretations are based on faulty assumptions, too? (For instance, your explanation as to why God brought the Flood is not completely accurate.)
The words that you read in the Scriptures, regarding Jehovah God, have not changed...Boyle, Kepler, etc., read those same words, and came to other conclusions, not the ones you reached. I'll go with their assessment!
Last edited: