CG Didymus
Veteran Member
I can understand why Baha'is think that it is Baha'u'llah. They need anything they can get to make the "return of Christ" their prophet and not Jesus himself. But doesn't Islam have Jesus coming back with the Mahdi? Maybe Firedragon or Link can clarify it. Here what I found...I think Muhammad also says that the Comforter verses are about him.
But yes the Comforter is called the Holy Spirit. (John 14:26)
Sunni and Shia Muslims hold that Isa (Jesus) and the Mahdi will be present at the same time...
The NT is about Jesus. It is the story about Jesus as told by his followers. TB put out a thread about there not being "eyewitnesses" in those stories. Maybe, but for sure, by Baha'i standards, it was not written by a supposed "infallible" person... a "manifestation" of God. So, that right there makes it less than God's Word for Baha'is. Yet, their leaders make it sound like Baha'is do take it as God's Word... at least parts of it. Which conveniently makes it okay to accept and reject whatever they want. And also, to interpret it anyway they want, since their guy is a manifestation, so whatever he says... is the infallible Word of God.In the Bible the Comforter is the Spirit of Truth and is the Holy Spirit which was given at Pentecost (Acts 2)
Any straw he could find. But, he is not the prophet. He is not an "infallible" person in the Baha'i Faith. And he's depending on the King James Bible as being a perfect translation. But is it? Other translation have "They" instead of "He" in Micah. And here's a translation that is completely different than the KJV...Bill Sears seemed willing to grasp at straws that in reality did not speak about Baha'u'llah
Micah 7:11-13
Complete Jewish Bible
11 That will be the day for rebuilding your walls,a day for expanding your territory,
12 a day when [your] people will come [back] to you
from Ashur and from the cities of Egypt,
from Egypt and from as far as the Euphrates River,
and from sea to sea, and from mountain to mountain.
13 The earth will be desolate for those living in it,
as a result of their deeds.
That's something that I think is very important. Did anyone, other than the Baha'is, say Moses? Or Muhammad? Or Abraham? Or Buddha? Was a manifestation? It's a Baha'i thing. It sounds kind of reasonable, but is it what's really going on? That there is One God out there that kept sending his special creations, manifestations, to teach people the truth?I don't think Muhammad (pbuh) ever claimed to be a manifestation, or Christ on the same level as Jesus in the way the Baha'i make him out to be.
To me, it looks more like everybody invented their rules, their Gods, and their religions. Like how do Baha'is explain this...
AI Overview
The Code of Hammurabi originated in the Babylonian region of Mesopotamia and was created by King Hammurabi, who ruled from 1792–1750 BCE:
The code was inscribed on a large, black stone stele (pillar) in the temple of Marduk, the national god of Babylonia.
And who was Marduk?
AI Overview
In the Bible, Marduk is a false god and the chief Babylonian deity who is conquered by the God of Israel
If Muhammad didn't claim to be a "manifestation", why do Baha'is make him one? I think it's only to support their belief in "progressive" revelation. And if they can convince people that progressive revelation is true, then their prophet, Baha'u'llah is the logical next "manifestation" in the long line of manifestations.Yes what is what I thought also. He claimed to be a prophet just the way a prophet is defined in the Bible, a person through whom God sends a message, no divine status at all and not from heaven.
And there are similar things in some religions. Jews have a progression of Judges and prophets. And in some Hindu sects there are several incarnations of the Lord Vishnu that are to come as needed. Similar, but not quite the same.
But close enough to make it sound reasonable. A few little tweaks here in the various Scriptures, and the Baha'is can show that it makes perfect sense... that it is how things work. But does it make "perfect" sense? Only by following Baha'i interpretations of the Bible and all the other Scriptures. Meaning... parts of the Scriptures have to be shown to be wrong or misinterpreted in some ways. And that's not "perfect". That's being very selective in what is true and what's not true in those Scriptures.
Last edited: