What is there to debate on this topic?
Well I guess that is the entire debate about God and Religion.
I have done some interesting reading from talks given by Abdu’l-Baha early on, before the first world war in America. What I have been reading is all the press releases of that time and how he was seen by the reporters and the public.
What I have found is that my view of faith and how to share it has been very wrong, in fact I feel as a Baha'i we have got it wrong in many ways.
I now consider that True Faith, given by God actually teaches itself. The written Word is proof of what we will and can become, only if we become that Word in our own lives and that and only that is the ultimate teacher.
Thus Abdul'baha offered no one needs to change their Faith, as a True Christian, or a Muslim, or a Hindu, or a Buddhist is already true to God.
This is from my Faith, I am sure yours also has writings that will give the same thoughts.
"When asked on one occasion: “What is a Bahá’í?” ‘Abdu’l-Bahá replied: “To be a Bahá’í simply means to love all the world; to love humanity and try to serve it; to work for universal peace and universal brotherhood.” On another occasion He defined a Bahá’í as “one endowed with all the perfections of man in activity.” In one of His London talks He said that a man may be a Bahá’í even if He has never heard the name of Bahá’u’lláh. He added:—
The man who lives the life according to the teachings of Bahá’u’lláh is already a Bahá’í. On the other hand, a man may call himself a Bahá’í for fifty years, and if he does not live the life he is not a Bahá’í. An ugly man may call himself handsome, but he deceives no one,.... not even himself."
Thus I am thinking that God has a plan, our lives are directed by our obedience to that plan, or our ignorance, or even rebellion against it.
Can you argue against that? If the intent of your Faith is to be the best you can and become one with all others, would you still argue with others of another faith that have the same goal?
I am seeing the argument over doctrinal differences only feeds the fire of disunity.
It may be that we are to find a unity in our diversity of Faiths, only when we practice what those Faiths offer in personal conduct.
Regards Tony
Yes you can argue against this. You don't need stories about supernatural communications with a God to serve humanity and want to do good things.
Evidence and critical thinking do not support these things. We are seeing what happens when people lack critical thinking skills. They tend to believe harmful things. We have seen this in recent political movements.
And what happens when one faction of a religion decides that the new message from God is to kill all the infidels?
Or another person convinces people he is the new God messenger and he hears a violent message.
People need critical thinking skills and to understand how to use evidence rather than emotional thinking and confirmation bias.
In the book about the Bahai prophet several important catagories are listed that a true messenger of God would have if he were legit.
One was bringing new philosophies, new facts about science, prophecies and a few others.
There was no new philosophies in the philosophy section. In fact compared to philosophers of the last few centuries it was not philosophy at all.
The prophecies were as vague as all others and dead wrong on one of them.
The science was all completely wrong and made statements that were demonstrably false. I pointed this all out in a thread.
But facts and evidence are not actually compelling to people who have already made emotional attachments to a religion.
Religious movements change, new prophets emerge, radical groups will also emerge. Only being able to look honestly at evidence (there isn't any for any religions) will we be able to move past this.
We can still do good things for humanity without people claiming to be having conversations with a God.
If you can only do your best because you are practicing a faith rather than just wanting to be a good person then that's also a problem.
Thus I am thinking that God has a plan, our lives are directed by our obedience to that plan, or our ignorance, or even rebellion against it.
See? Act the way I think you should according to my interpretation of my religion and then things go good. Otherwise it's all bad. Even worse, it's now "obedience" to an interpretation, like it's some king in the sky?
Or if you find the evidence completely lacking now you are "rebelling"??
So are you disobediant to Krishna? Are you rebelling against the Mormon version of God? No, you just find them to be make believe stories. See lack of critical thinking causes people to call others disobediant and rebels?