An exit to one that isn't the same?
Yeah. The woods.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
An exit to one that isn't the same?
Expect for the video you ignored, of course.Repeating yourself does not change the fact that you have not demonstrated any one had foreknowledge, you have merely declared it.
Yeah. The woods.
Thank you.I see. Good idea if you can sustain it. I've always been close to the woods.
The scenario I see is natural or manmade disaster. The people in the city, typically the left, will be done for, probably not being able to get to the rural areas, where churches will probably be the hubs of what's left of society. Food, medicine, news, community. They have guns there. To hunt and fight off the relatively small hordes of surviving city dwellers.
thank you for demonstrating that your standards are not even a tripping hazard.
How is it that my interpretation of possible events of natural or manmade catastrophes could possibly illicit such a response and why?Thank you.
Too many assumptions that don't reflect reality here so I'm not responding. Good day.
Tired tropes are tired.
Because it's exactly that an interpretation and assumption. Future tripping. Aka predicting the future.How is it that my interpretation of possible events of natural or manmade catastrophes could possibly illicit such a response and why?
I don't feel like it.Why not just give me your interpretation? Constructively criticize mine, and I will do the same for you.
No anger here at all. I just don't talk with assumptions.Why the anger?
People are wonderful. But they scare me.People fascinate and bore me simultaneously.
Better get your ouija board out so you can learn how to play a video.thank you for demonstrating that your standards are not even a tripping hazard.
Your unnatural obsession with dead bodies is something you should have looked into.Better get your ouija board out so you can learn how to play a video.
You brought up death and necrophilia, not me.Your unnatural obsession with dead bodies is something you should have looked into.
Like I already told you, necrophilia is seriously frowned upon in the USA.
You brought up death when you invoked my dead mother.You brought up death, not me.
No, I said nothing about her being dead.You brought up death when you invoked my dead mother.
Looks like you need to take a remedial reading for comprehension course.No, I said nothing about her being dead.
I know what I posted. Just like the video that shows foreknowledge, you can't cope with the facts.Looks like you need to take a remedial reading for comprehension course.
Merely repeating your bold empty claim does not in any way support said bold empty claim.I know what I posted. Just like the video that shows foreknowledge, you can't cope with the facts.
Do you deny that the guy crouches before shots are fired?Merely repeating your bold empty claim does not in any way support said bold empty claim.
Nope.Do you deny that the guy crouches before shots are fired?
Gosh, that's the same reasoning that led me to correct your cantankerously incorrect correction.I merely corrected you.
You needed correcting.
....especially when their usage is correct for the context in which it occurs.
You're planning to die on that hill, eh.
Ignorance can be aggressive.
What credible reason could there be for him crouching other than to avoid getting hit?Nope.
I deny that it even implies foreknowledge, let alone proves it.
A linguist, eh. Cunning?I'm a linguist. I'm always willing to die for a wordy cause.