Trump Bashing Leaks

[Mister_T]

Yes, and it does not disprove my claim.

Yes it does, you have do this magic thing called reading.

Also, that website is Snopes. Snopes has a lot of shady things about it on the internet.

Snopes is used to debunk lies and misinformation. I can see why you wouldn't like it.

Also, why did Hillary Clinton have (among many other things) someone say they will sacrifice a 'chicken' to Moloch in her backyard in the Wikileaks email scandals?

The question you should be asking yourself is why Trump supporters are so gullible and believe silly things like what you posted above.

Will you ever show us how Trump isn't worse than Hillary with secure information or just post more nonsense because you know you're wrong?

 

[Maponos]

Yes it does, you have do this magic thing called reading.


Snopes is used to debunk lies and misinformation. I can see why you wouldn't like it.


The question you should be asking yourself is why Trump supporters are so gullible and believe silly things like what you posted above.

Will you ever show us how Trump isn't worse than Hillary with secure information or just post more nonsense because you know you're wrong?

I did and it doesn't. It's kind of hard for them to deny actual audio captured of her gloating.

Snopes is well known for having a leftist bias lately, if that is what accounts for 'truth'.

And here's the email.

Well, Trump for one, hasn't had a massive email scandal implicating him in all manner of crimes.

 

[Mister_T]

I did and it doesn't. It's kind of hard for them to deny actual audio captured of her gloating.

Which, unsurprisingly, is just further proof that you didn't read it.

"WHAT'S FALSE


Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant."

Snopes is well known for having a leftist bias lately, if that is what accounts for 'truth'.

Snopes deals with facts and cite their sources. You choosing to be willfully ignorant about said facts is your own responsibility, not theirs.

And here's the email.

There actually being an email of said nonsense is not the issue. You believing and putting stock in such irrelevant nonsense however, is.

Well, Trump for one, hasn't had a massive email scandal implicating him in all manner of crimes.

A massive email scandal is just proof of manufactured outrage at most, not that Trump is any better at securing sensitive information.

Here's a fact: Hillary stored emails on a private server; Trump openly handled an issue with North Korea's missile test in front of patrons at a resort, and that's just one example. Do you really need someone to explain to you which one is worse? No need to answer, if your other posts in this thread are any indication of your objectivity, I know citing that example is just a waste of time.

 

[Maponos]

Which, unsurprisingly, is just further proof that you didn't read it.

"WHAT'S FALSE


Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant."


Snopes deals with facts and cite their sources. You choosing to be willfully ignorant about said facts is your own responsibility, not theirs.


There actually being an email of said nonsense is not the issue. You believing and putting stock in such irrelevant nonsense however, is.


A massive email scandal is just proof of manufactured outrage at most, not that Trump is any better at securing sensitive information.

Here's a fact: Hillary stored emails on a private server; Trump openly handled an issue with North Korea's missile test in front of patrons at a resort, and that's just one example. Do you really need someone to explain to you which one is worse? No need to answer, if your other posts in this thread are any indication of your objectivity, I know citing that example is just a waste of time.

Why are you ignoring the audio of her gloating?

Sure; but their conclusions of late are dubious at best.

It's from her actual emails, so take it as you will.

The emails were released because they were important to uncovering the horrible person the Clinton family is. Wikileaks is a very neutral source.

That's not all she did. Have you read her emails? She's implicated in human trafficking, by reading them and the Podesta emails.

I'm not sure how that makes him a bad person, to be honest.

 

[idav]

Trumpet is once again slamming FBI for leaks.
Donald Trump slams FBI 'leakers' amid reports the bureau refused to deny Russian links

 

[tytlyf]

Trumpet is once again slamming FBI for leaks.
Donald Trump slams FBI 'leakers' amid reports the bureau refused to deny Russian links

Fascist Dictators hate 'watch dogs.' They like to get rid of them so they can get away with whatever they want. The man had no business becoming president, signs were there way before the election.