I have no idea if Trump did anything to this woman but neither does anyone else including the jury. A man was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil case based on testimony of the accuser and some friends when they could not even remember the date some 26+ years ago. They also brought evidence that Trump was accused of doing bad things in the past so he must have done this which should not be allowed, it has no bearing on this claim. What defense is possible against that? Also, how does a jury come up with a compromise on this? She said she was raped and the jury said no, she was only abused. Where is the evidence for that?
Does anyone here care about Tara Reade? Why is her story not credible and Carroll's is?
A former aide to the presidential candidate finds support for her sexual assault claim against him.
www.bbc.com