Trump is losing the debate acting like a raving lunatic

[Pogo]

Which side are you on?

Appeasement.

 

[Aupmanyav]

If the EC in US was constituted by people not elected by people, then Indian Supreme Court would have struck-down its decisions.

 

[We Never Know]

Which side are you on?

That's not what I asked you.

 

[We Never Know]

Btw, any one wanting to see exactly what questions were asked and what answers were given at the debate, here is the transcript.
Now no one has to guess or assume anymore.

Read the full transcript of ABC News' presidential debate between Harris and Trump

Read the full transcript of ABC News' presidential debate between Harris and Trump

Harris and Trump go head-to-head for 90-minutes in their first ever presidential nominee debate hosted by ABC News.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Ebionite]

I guess by your knee-jerk over-reaction, and refusal to answer, you are ashamed to give us your answer.

More TDS

 

[Ebionite]

Because they are smart, well-informed, and care about the future of America.

And are constructed entirely from your own vanity.

 

[Subduction Zone]

More TDS

I gees that is a good excuse for you to not answer. Not to worry, you can get over it. Meanwhile here is an inspirational song for you:

 

[Ebionite]

Btw, any one wanting to see exactly what questions were asked and what answers were given at the debate, here is the transcript.
Now no one has to guess or assume anymore.

While Kamala did not receive the exact question the moderators asked, she allegedly received sample questions so she’d know generally what to expect.

An ABC employee’s sworn affidavit claims ABC cheated to help Kamala win

The Black Insurrectionist did the legwork and obtained what appears to be a duly signed affidavit from an ABC employee attesting under oath to the network’s staggering corruption to ensure that Kamala Harris won her single debate against Donald...

www.americanthinker.com

 

[Ebionite]

Trump was doing OK until he mentioned that cats and dogs were being eaten by people in Springfield, Ohio. After that he's been ranting an raving incoherent stream of consciousness nonsense, lying about one thing or another.

TDS strikes again

 

[ImmortalFlame]

TDS strikes again

View attachment 97253

Please provide a source for this image, and explain the fact that the Springfield police have spoken very openly that there is no evidence Haitian residents are eating pets.

"We stand by our immigrant community and there is no evidence to even remotely suggest that any group, including our immigrant community, is engaged in eating pets. Seeing politicians or other individuals use outlandish information to appeal to their constituents is disheartening."

A Statement from the Dayton Police

www.daytonohio.gov

Springfield police say no reports of pets stolen, eaten, after viral social media post

The Springfield Police Division said Monday they have received no reports related to pets being stolen and eaten.

www.springfieldnewssun.com

Ohio police dispute new allegations immigrants are eating pets in Dayton

Sen. JD Vance and others shared a new video and article alleging African immigrants were seen preparing to grill dead cats.

www.cbsnews.com

Police debunk Vance’s racist claim that Haitian immigrants are eating pet dogs, cats

Despite police saying they’ve received no credible reports, the rumor continues to spread thanks to JD Vance, Elon Musk and Rudy Guiliani

www.independent.co.uk

 

[Terrywoodenpic]

While Kamala did not receive the exact question the moderators asked, she allegedly received sample questions so she’d know generally what to expect.

An ABC employee’s sworn affidavit claims ABC cheated to help Kamala win

The Black Insurrectionist did the legwork and obtained what appears to be a duly signed affidavit from an ABC employee attesting under oath to the network’s staggering corruption to ensure that Kamala Harris won her single debate against Donald...

www.americanthinker.com

I would not be surprised if both were given a brief on the subjects of the questions. It is quite normal in political debates. Of course Trump would have had to read them.
But then his mind had become fixated on eating cats and dogs, any thing else was lost in the fog of his dementia.

 

[Ebionite]

But then his mind had become fixated on eating cats and dogs, any thing else was lost in the fog of his dementia.

More TDS

 

[It Aint Necessarily So]

I despise Trump but I do not despise the Republican Party. So I hope the REPUBLICAN PARTY wins.

You despise Trump but support the party that venerates him and hope that Trump becomes president because he calls himself Republican. I guess that makes sense to you. Trump defines what it means to be a Republican today.

some religions value knowledge.

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy Elohim, I will also forget thy children.
Hosea 4:6

He shall see of the travail of his soul, [and] shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.
Isaiah 53:11

For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of Elohim more than burnt offerings.
Hosea 6:6

Unfalsifiable beliefs about gods and afterlives are not knowledge to me, which I define as demonstrably correct ideas that can be used to predict outcomes.

Keep misrepresenting Trump

"only" on day 1, and for 2 specific goals.

Trump couldn't be a dictator on day one, but if he were ever to secure that kind of power, he would not let it go after one day, one week, or one year. He orchestrated an insurrection to avoid losing power.

I've used the analogy that being a decent person and a responsible American citizen is like working for a business with two owners that each have hiring, firing, and check-writing authority, where one brother keeps hiring dishonest CEOs that are only there for themselves and to loot the bank accounts while running the business into the ground. If you stay on there, eventually, you will be working according to the vision of the incompetent and dishonest brother again. We expatriated, which was basically analogous to finding a new, more stable job with another company.

While Kamala did not receive the exact question the moderators asked, she allegedly received sample questions so she’d know generally what to expect.

Everybody knew what kinds of questions to expect. The questions were all predictable. We're not talking about a math exam here.

Look at how little Harris detractors have to work with. She didn't win a primary so she's antidemocratic. She answered the questions asked of her with such decisiveness that MAGA claims she cheated. She changed her position on fracking. Her womb never bore fruit.

And they make these arguments in defense of one of the most flawed people on the planet who intends to make the American government work for him. And remarkably, there are tens of millions of them. That's a huge problem for the other kind of American, who knows better.

 

[Riders]

the guy is 78 years old. I think he's mentally ill. Hed be better off quiting and taking a along vacation.

 

[LadyJane]

the guy is 78 years old. I think he's mentally ill. Hed be better off quiting and taking a along vacation.

That would be in everyone's best interest.

 

[We Never Know]

While Kamala did not receive the exact question the moderators asked, she allegedly received sample questions so she’d know generally what to expect.

An ABC employee’s sworn affidavit claims ABC cheated to help Kamala win

The Black Insurrectionist did the legwork and obtained what appears to be a duly signed affidavit from an ABC employee attesting under oath to the network’s staggering corruption to ensure that Kamala Harris won her single debate against Donald...

www.americanthinker.com

For me that isn't a reliable source.

• Overall, we rate the American Thinker as Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

American Thinker - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[Ebionite]

For me that isn't a reliable source.

Gateway Pundit is also reporting on the story.

Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) revealed on Friday that a Senate investigation into ABC News and Kamala Harris’s campaign is underway. Marshall suspects collusion between ABC and the Harris team, citing Kamala’s unusually prepared responses as evidence that she knew the questions ahead of time.

X User 'Black Insurrectionist' Agrees to Put Gateway Pundit in Contact with Alleged ABC Whistleblower's Attorney After Releasing 'Affidavit' on Debate Rigging Scandal | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

UPDATE: To this day, neither the whistleblower nor the attorney have contacted The Gateway Pundit.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The partially redacted affidavit is available here:

x.com

x.com

 

[We Never Know]

Gateway Pundit is also reporting on the story.

Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) revealed on Friday that a Senate investigation into ABC News and Kamala Harris’s campaign is underway. Marshall suspects collusion between ABC and the Harris team, citing Kamala’s unusually prepared responses as evidence that she knew the questions ahead of time.

X User 'Black Insurrectionist' Agrees to Put Gateway Pundit in Contact with Alleged ABC Whistleblower's Attorney After Releasing 'Affidavit' on Debate Rigging Scandal | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

UPDATE: To this day, neither the whistleblower nor the attorney have contacted The Gateway Pundit.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The partially redacted affidavit is available here:

x.com

x.com

That's just as bad

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

The Gateway Pundit - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[ImmortalFlame]

That's just as bad

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

The Gateway Pundit - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Wow. They went from using a source with LOW factual reporting to a source with VERY LOW factual reporting.

 

[Wandering Monk]

I would not be surprised if both were given a brief on the subjects of the questions. It is quite normal in political debates. Of course Trump would have had to read them.
But then his mind had become fixated on eating cats and dogs, any thing else was lost in the fog of his dementia.

As Michael Cohen said: The last one in Trump's ear owns the brain.