SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Sorry but I think you reside in LaLaLand with Trump.Disinformation. We already know that the issues have been ongoing in Springfield since before Vance was selected by Trump as VP. Yet here you are claiming Vance made it up.
These problems have in common that they are caused by massive immigration into Springfield.
You are the one claiming Kamala didn't make any delusional claims... so just admit that you don't have an unbiased view.
If people don't vote for a candidate, then, yes, obviously, that can be why a candidate doesn't get elected... I'm not sure what autocracy you are living in where that's not the case... it's even worse that you think this is some sort of anti-semitic trope. I'm sorry that you have been led down a path of such blind hate.
While some immigrants already resided in Springfield, the recent massive influx of immigrants into Springfield is part of the massive inflow taking place under the Biden-Harris administration for the past 3.5 years.
The lie alleges that Trump called nazis fine people, when, in reality, Trump condemned them.
LoL, it's only a lie if Trump or Vance says it?!? What are you on? Seriously, where do you even get your information from that you've somehow ended up with that point of view?
I've brought up many issues besides the pet-eating issue: car crashes, harassment of residents, and an over-loaded health care system, to name a few. Springfield has multiple problems as a result of immigration under the Biden-Harris administration.
Perhaps you'd like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the problems Springfield faces as a result of immigration.
You don't deny it.
That was a question to Kamala, as opposed to a fact-check of her response. Perhaps you didn't watch the debate.
Suggesting Trump is anti-semitic because of Charlottesville is insane - and not fact-checked by the moderators.
Trump demolished their fact check in real time at the debate.
Why don't you come out and admit that you believe the residents of Springfield are lying? You accuse Trump and Vance of lying and you malign me for simply pointing out that this issue is going to go well for them politically, but you can't say that you don't believe what the residents of Springfield have said? Maybe you need to take a break from this.
Good question! In some cases, residents are speaking for multiple others - as indicated in the March 12, 2024 City Commisssion Meeting. We only see a fraction of the people who are experience problems at the City Commission Meetings. So I don't actually know how many people have experienced problems, but there are a lot of them. Moreover, I guess your lack of response to my question means that you don't actually know what Vance said about Springfield. You were simply spreading disinformation by saying that Vance had invented the stories.
Did you watch Kamala at the debate? Do you think it looked like she knew about the problems in Springfield?
Not a problem for you at least.
It's not been great in Springfield. People (including children included) have been killed or hospitalized as a consequence of immigrants not being acclimated to life there. So, yes, it is a negative experience in many ways.
I've been clear that even if you don't believe cats are being eaten... that the issues in Springfield mean the attention there will swing in Trump's favor as time passes. Moreover, this is the main point of the post I made (that you replied to). Yet you've shown that you are quite willing to say Trump is lying while balking at affirming the claim that the residents who reported the stories are lying. I think that shows that you are commited to maligning Trump at all costs.
YOU are spreading disinformation about Trump's absolutely delusional claim that people are stealing and eating cats. You cling to this it the face of ZERO evidence, just like Trump. Vance even admitted he made it up. And here you are still spreading disinformation about it.